Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 27 April 2022

27 Apr 2022 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Business Motions

Presiding Officer, Labour will support the amendment to the business motion. I would like it to be noted, however, that that is no reflection whatsoever on the hard work of the committee members.

As Jamie Greene set out, the Criminal Justice Committee was asked to scrutinise the Fireworks and Pyrotechnic Articles (Scotland) Bill using a fast-tracked timetable so that we could bring in the new much-needed offence of supplying fireworks to a person who is under the age of 18 in enough time for the November bonfire season. I agreed, while not fully realising that other aspects of the bill would require much deeper scrutiny than was first thought, including aspects in the stage 1 report that was signed off today around the complexities in the creation of a new licensing scheme, which will require close consideration.

Had I known that the Government would not allow for the usual five days prior to the stage 1 debate, as is required under standing orders, I would have made more objections in the first place against a shortened timetable for completion of the stage 1 report. It does not set a good precedent not to comply with standing order rule 9.6.3A.

As Jamie Greene has done for his party, I place on the record that we support the intentions of the Fireworks and Pyrotechnic Articles (Scotland) Bill, and commend the work of the Government and stakeholders. However, we must be prepared to uphold the integrity of the scrutiny process, and it should not be squeezed into a stage 1 debate on Tuesday when stakeholders will not have had time to respond, and we only have the Government’s promise that we will see what it has to say before we have that debate. It is quite unprecedented that the committee report will be published tomorrow afternoon, as the May day holiday is a potential barrier to many who will want to brief members of Parliament who might want to take part in the debate. It is completely unsatisfactory.

The debate could be held on Wednesday; I am not clear why it cannot be. This is one of the first pieces of legislation that has been made in session 6 of the Parliament, and we should be seen to be treating it with respect.

The committee struggled to get data on the crime of fireworks misuse—on which I think the Parliament is unanimous—so that it can understand the picture across Scotland. The data came so late that we cannot influence the stage 1 reports.

Members can see that many factors are making it difficult for the committee to properly scrutinise this important bill. It is therefore unhelpful that, at the end of the process, the Government has chosen to give us no time to consider our response to the report. I hope that there is a way of saying how we intend to go forward in this parliamentary session, which is still in its early stages, and that we will do the right thing and oppose the business motion. Let us let stakeholders give a proper response to the Fireworks and Pyrotechnic Articles (Scotland) Bill. Let us scrutinise it properly. I ask all members, please, not to make an assumption that, just because there is a stage 1 report, the Government has got everything right. I assure members that they will want to discuss quite a number of things when they see the report.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is consideration of business motion S6M-04176, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, on setting out a ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I now call Jamie Greene to speak to, and move amendment S6M-04176.1, for up to five minutes. 16:57
Jamie Greene (West Scotland) (Con) Con
I thank members for their forbearance on the comments that I would like to make. We have been asked today to approve a stage 1 debate on the Fireworks and P...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Thank you, Mr Greene. The Parliamentary Bureau makes recommendations to the Parliament. The Parliament has an opportunity to debate those recommendations, wh...
Pauline McNeill (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
Presiding Officer, Labour will support the amendment to the business motion. I would like it to be noted, however, that that is no reflection whatsoever on t...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I invite George Adam to respond on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau. 17:04
The Minister for Parliamentary Business (George Adam) SNP
I will endeavour to put the minds of colleagues in the Opposition parties at ease on the matter. The Fireworks and Pyrotechnic Articles (Scotland) Bill is e...
Liz Smith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
George Adam SNP
I ask the member to let me continue. The bill is very important to our constituents, and we must do our utmost to ensure that it delivers for them.
Liz Smith Con
Will the minister give way?
George Adam SNP
I ask the member to listen for a wee bit longer. There are clear practical advantages to the process of parliamentary scrutiny of the bill concluding in adva...
Pauline McNeill Lab
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. An amendment has been lodged in Parliament concerning a breach of standing orders in relation to the five-day requir...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Thank you for that point of order. It is, of course, always a matter of courtesy and respect that questions that are put to members are answered. The standi...
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. There will be a short suspension to allow members to access the digital voting system. 17:09 Meeting suspended. 17:13 On resuming—
The Presiding Officer NPA
We come to the vote on amendment S6M-04176.1, in the name of Jamie Greene. Members should cast their votes now. For Baker, Claire (Mid Scotland and Fife) (...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The result of the division on amendment S6M-04176.1, in the name of Jamie Greene, which seeks to amend motion S6M-04176, in the name of George Adam, on behal...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The next question is, that motion S6M-04176, in the name of George Adam, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, setting out a business programme, be agreed t...
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. For Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP) Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) Adamson, Clare (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP) ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The result of the division on motion S6M-04176, in the name of George Adam, is: For 64, Against 47, Abstentions 0. Motion agreed to, That the Parliament ag...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The next item of business is consideration of business motion S6M-04208, in the name of George Adam, on suspension of standing orders. Motion moved, That t...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The question is, that motion S6M-04208 be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. For Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP) Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) Adamson, Clare (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP) ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The result of the division on motion S6M-04208, in the name of George Adam, is: For 63, Against 47, Abstentions 0. Motion agreed to, That the Parliament ag...