Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 23 February 2022

23 Feb 2022 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Workplace Parking Licensing Schemes

I welcome this debate led by Graham Simpson. Let us be clear: despite what the minister said, too many people across Scotland simply cannot rely on our public transport system to get to work—and that is truer today than it was when the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 was passed. There has been a huge contraction in the bus network and in rail services since the pandemic, and services are not returning to pre-pandemic levels. Just two weeks ago, the Scottish Government made it clear that it does not support returning ScotRail services to pre-pandemic levels—at least not now, and not any time soon.

People who take the car to work because there is no affordable or convenient alternative should not be penalised for the failures of this Government—the Government that is responsible for the failed deal with Abellio and that took us into the pandemic with bus passenger numbers at a record low.

A commuter tax on getting to work is not the solution—not for the economy, not for the climate and not for workers, and certainly not when people are facing a cost of living crisis. The SNP and Greens rightly criticise the Conservatives’ cuts to universal credit by £20 per week, but they are now enabling proposals to hit low-income workers with a tax that could be up to £20 per week.

The solution is to transform public transport and invest in real, viable alternatives to car dependency, with alternatives such as integrated multimodal ticketing, which was promised 10 years ago, or a publicly controlled bus network for Strathclyde, with its population of 2.1 million. City regions across England are planning to take control of bus networks. If we want to make bus travel more affordable, why are we not doing that here in Scotland, in cities such as Glasgow? It is telling that the Government is proposing to grant powers for this tax before rolling out the bus regulation powers contained in the 2019 act.

Our society faces two great challenges: a cost of living crisis and a climate crisis. We do not deal with the cost of living crisis by taxing commuters getting to work; we deal with it by transforming public transport.

Let me be clear: Scottish Labour opposes the workplace parking levy. We opposed it in 2019, and we oppose it now. We are demanding that this tax on working people stops before it starts. With living costs rising faster than at any time in the past 30 years, we are demanding that the Scottish Government act now. It is wrong for ministers, who have the privilege of a chauffeur-driven car to get to work, to impose this commuter tax now. It is wrong for MSPs, who claim mileage and enjoy free parking, to impose this tax now. Politicians here do not experience transport poverty. The Green and nationalist MSPs behind this tax are not on low incomes. There are people experiencing transport poverty in Scotland now, however, and they could be hit if and when their employer passes this levy on to them. I say to those politicians: do not punish the working people of this country, who have kept Scotland going throughout the pandemic, for your failure to provide a decent public transport system.

We know that there has been no modelling of the impact of the levy, and there is no consistency on exemptions, so we face the possibility that healthcare workers will be exempt, but a low-paid cleaner working late for a private employer will not be.

There has been no engagement at ministerial level with the trade unions since the 2019 act was passed. For all those reasons, the levy should be stopped.

We know that the concentration of workplaces in city centres drives commuting patterns that place a strain on our cities, and we understand city councillors’ concerns about congestion and air quality, especially in Edinburgh and Glasgow. We believe that the Scottish Government should work constructively with Scotland’s cities to address those issues comprehensively.

Nonetheless, action on air quality and congestion must not be limited to a single ineffective unfair tax. The Conservative motion rightly identifies the need to promote electric vehicles, but the Scottish Government and councils have to ensure that charging infrastructure is easy to use, convenient and resilient. The Government can do more. It can, for example, provide new park-and-ride facilities, restore suburban rail services and embed better access to public transport in planning guidance, and I have written to the minister to ask her to consider those points.

Scottish Labour is prepared to work constructively with the Government to reduce pollution and congestion in our cities. We say to the Government that there are alternatives and better ways to reduce car dependency, and we will work together to find solutions. However, the imposition of a new tax on working people who are in the grip of a cost of living crisis solves nothing. I appeal to members to support the Labour amendment today and demand better for Scotland’s commuters.

I move amendment S6M-03279.1, to leave out from “, not on using taxes” to end and insert:

“; believes that the Workplace Parking Levy will unfairly penalise working people who have no option but to drive to work due to the chronic failure of the Scottish Government to improve public transport; regrets the Scottish Government’s decision to reject calls for a freeze on rail fares this year; considers that the Scottish Government’s decision to pursue policies that increase costs faced by workers during a cost of living crisis is irresponsible; notes objections to the Workplace Parking Levy from trade unions and the business community, and considers that the Scottish Government should make positive interventions to tackle transport emissions, reduce car dependency and drive modal shift by making public transport more affordable, safe and accessible, restoring ScotRail services to pre-pandemic levels, supporting municipal ownership and control of local bus services, developing safe cycling routes, and rolling out integrated ticketing across the public transport network.”

16:26  
References in this contribution

Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-03279, in the name of Graham Simpson, on a workplace parking tax. I ask members who wish to participate t...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Yesterday, I moved in committee a motion to annul an instrument that brought in provisions in the Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 to allow councils to introduc...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP) SNP
Does Graham Simpson accept that there is an air pollution problem in Glasgow and, potentially, in Edinburgh, that there is congestion on the roads and that w...
Graham Simpson Con
The way to tackle those things is by improving public transport, which I will come to. Ms Gilruth says that the Government can call in schemes, but when she...
The Minister for Transport (Jenny Gilruth) SNP
I thank Mr Simpson for the opportunity, but I answered his question yesterday. The power is a local power for local authorities to decide on. I thought that ...
Graham Simpson Con
Once again, the minister refuses to say what she thinks would be an acceptable limit. It is not clear what the workplace parking tax is meant to achieve. If...
Jenny Gilruth SNP
Would Mr Simpson give way on that point?
Graham Simpson Con
I have already given way. The minister can explain that in her speech. The SNP and the Greens say that they want to get people out of their cars. The way to...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I call the minister to speak to and move amendment S6M-03279.2. 16:14
The Minister for Transport (Jenny Gilruth) SNP
I welcome the opportunity to debate the merits of having provided discretionary powers to local authorities to implement workplace parking licensing schemes,...
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
If the levy is about reducing emissions from cars, why are electric vehicles and hydrogen vehicles not exempt categories in the legislation?
Jenny Gilruth SNP
Mr Kerr seems to think that we should look at electric vehicles and public transport in isolation. We need to look at emissions in the round. We are taking a...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Jenny Gilruth SNP
I would like to make some progress. Disincentivisation measures, such as WPL schemes, are needed if we are to reach the targets. The regulations allow local...
Liam Kerr Con
On that note—
Jenny Gilruth SNP
Although I have already taken an intervention from Mr Kerr, I will take another on that point.
Liam Kerr Con
Is the minister not aware that Nottingham invested in its public transport before it brought in the levy?
Jenny Gilruth SNP
Mr Kerr seems to be suggesting that we are not already investing in public transport in Scotland. We are investing in our rail and bus infrastructure; we can...
Miles Briggs Con
Will the minister take an intervention?
Jenny Gilruth SNP
I would like to make some progress, please. As Councillor Steven Heddle, who is COSLA’s environment and economy spokesperson, noted when the legislation was...
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister take an intervention on that point?
Jenny Gilruth SNP
I am in my last minute. Local authorities must consult locally those who are likely to be impacted by local schemes, and they should undertake impact assess...
Neil Bibby (West Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I welcome this debate led by Graham Simpson. Let us be clear: despite what the minister said, too many people across Scotland simply cannot rely on our publi...
Beatrice Wishart (Shetland Islands) (LD) LD
I thank Graham Simpson for bringing the debate to the chamber. Scottish Liberal Democrats cannot support the SNP-Green plans to introduce the workplace parki...
John Mason SNP
Does the member accept that it will be entirely up to each council—Orkney, Shetland and the Western Isles—to decide whether it wants such a scheme?
Beatrice Wishart LD
More areas than just the islands are affected; I referred to remote and rural areas, too. Does the Government believe that a teacher—a front-line worker who...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Excuse me, Ms Wishart. Could we have a little less chatter at the back of the chamber, please?
Beatrice Wishart LD
Those who live in urban areas might not escape some of the consequences of the levy either. Residents may now see their streets blocked up by displaced vehic...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
We now move to the open debate. Time is tight so I would be grateful if speakers could stick to their allotted time. 16:30
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
I will use the time that I have to outline the impact of the car park tax on my constituents here in Edinburgh and the wider Lothian region. Motorists in Edi...