Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 03 February 2022

03 Feb 2022 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Cost of Living

I declare an interest as an honorary vice-president of Energy Action Scotland.

Today, the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets lifted the cap on energy prices again. The previous increase added £139 to bills; there will now be an extra £700 to pay. Energy bills have, in effect, doubled in the space of a few months. People who are on fixed incomes, people in insecure jobs, people on low pay and elderly people have plunged into debt or face a choice between heating or eating.

Currently, 613,000 households are in fuel poverty. That figure could rise threefold, to 1.8 million households in Scotland alone. If that is not serious enough, Scots face increases across a range of other household bills, all at a time when incomes are stagnant and simply not keeping pace with those increases. That will devastate family finances, as people stare down the barrel of a cost of living crisis caused by inflation, which is running at a 30-year high, rises in interest rates, rising national insurance contributions, which are increasing by 10 per cent in April, rising council tax, inflation-busting rises in water rates, and massive rises in food bills, which everybody sees on their supermarket shelves. There is no doubt about the scale of the crisis and the real struggle that Scots will face.

Faced with the prospect of increasing poverty and warnings from organisations such as Energy Action Scotland that some people will die as a consequence, it is incumbent on Governments to act. Let me be clear: I expect both the Scottish Government and the United Kingdom Government to set aside their customary differences and work together to protect people from the crisis.

The Scottish Government has the power to help, whether that is through putting more income in people’s pockets or reviewing some of the charges that it is responsible for. Doing nothing is not an option. The Scottish National Party’s amendment is therefore genuinely disappointing. Simply saying how much it is already doing is breathtakingly complacent. People are facing a doubling of their energy bills and a huge cost of living crisis.

I will give the Government one example of how it can help. Water bills are set for an inflation-busting rise of almost 10 per cent and households will be paying hundreds of pounds more. That comes at a time when Scottish Water is sitting on at least £400 million in reserves, and possibly as much as £700 million in reserves when one considers its subsidiary companies. Those reserves are taxpayers’ money. We should not forget that the SNP tried, until it was rumbled, to remove the single person’s discount from water bills a couple of years ago. The SNP was warned about the impact of the latest rises but, given the chance to do things differently and actually help people and be on their side, SNP members stick their fingers in their ears and do nothing.

Aside from reviewing the increased charges for which it is responsible, the Scottish Government can increase the amount that it gives to help with heating. It has all the powers that it needs to do so; it simply requires political will. Yesterday, I, like many others, watched in disbelief as the SNP suggested that we could cut the bottoms off school doors to help with ventilation. I kid you not—that Alice in Wonderland approach is what passes for policy thinking from the SNP. Next, perhaps, it will suggest that we burn the cut-offs from those doors to heat our homes. To be frank, the people of Scotland deserve better than that. They deserve a Government that is on their side; that does not use the constitution as an excuse for inaction; and that protects their interest when times are tough.

I turn to the Conservatives. I point out as gently as I can that the Tory amendment is not factually correct, because Rishi Sunak has actually frozen some personal allowances. That aside, let me be the first to welcome anything that puts money in people’s pockets. To be frank, however, the Tories’ approach is wholly inadequate. Giving energy companies loans simply lands bill payers with the cost at a later date, and with prices set to rise again in six months’ time, it will do nothing to resolve the crisis. The council tax rebate is worth about £150 per household, which is less than a quarter of what is required.

The big difference between Labour and the Tories and the SNP, which are joined at the hip on this issue, is that Labour would raise the money now through a windfall tax on North Sea oil and gas profits and on the higher-than-expected VAT receipts and oil and gas revenues.

For the SNP to join the Tories to reject that approach and deny the Scottish people immediate help and support on the scale that is required is, to be frank, shameful. SNP members should hang their heads in shame. The SNP and the Tories have demonstrated whose side they are on. They are on the side of multinational oil companies that are making profits of £27,000 a minute—that is right: £27,000 a minute, which is more than some people earn in a year—rather than being on the side of hard-pressed Scots who are staring down the barrel of a cost of living crisis that is the worst in my memory.

Under Labour’s fully costed plans, every single Scottish household would get £200 towards the cost of their spiralling energy bills. For the 800,000 households that are hardest hit, the support would be £600, and it would apply to those both on and off the grid.

Every single penny of the £290 million in funding consequentials for the Scottish Government from the United Kingdom Government must go into the pockets of people who need urgent help. Will the SNP bring proposals to the chamber next week to outline how it will distribute the money? That cannot wait.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-03042, in the name of Jackie Baillie, on the cost of living. 14:42
Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab) Lab
I declare an interest as an honorary vice-president of Energy Action Scotland. Today, the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets lifted the cap on energy pri...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
You must conclude.
Jackie Baillie Lab
There can be no excuses, no inaction and no hiding behind the constitution—the SNP must act, and act now, in the interests of the people of Scotland.
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
You need to move the motion, Ms Baillie.
Jackie Baillie Lab
I move, That the Parliament recognises the pressure being placed on household finances across Scotland due to rising inflation, increasing food and fuel pri...
The Minister for Just Transition, Employment and Fair Work (Richard Lochhead) SNP
This is an important and timely debate, as hundreds of thousands of families and households across Scotland are facing very challenging financial circumstanc...
Pam Duncan-Glancy (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
The minister says that the Scottish Government is doing what it can, but a number of issues have been raised, including by Citizens Advice Scotland, on the G...
Richard Lochhead SNP
As the First Minister said, discussions are going on with the UK Government about the consequentials from its announcements, and that money will be earmarked...
Liz Smith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
I acknowledge that this is a very serious issue for many families who see their household bills going in only one direction, at the same time as they try to ...
The Minister for Zero Carbon Buildings, Active Travel and Tenants’ Rights (Patrick Harvie) Green
I understand that those who instinctively like low-tax policies sometimes have to make an effort to come to terms with the need for such a rise. Why were the...
Liz Smith Con
I thank Mr Harvie for that intervention, but it is all about economic growth, which his party is not terribly keen on. Scottish Fiscal Commission statistics ...
Jackie Baillie Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Liz Smith Con
I will just finish this point, Ms Baillie. The companies in question are owned by us all through pension funds and insurance firms, and they have to be attr...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
You need to be winding up, Ms Smith, instead of taking interventions. Be as brief as possible, Ms Baillie.
Jackie Baillie Lab
I will be very quick. Will Liz Smith at least acknowledge that it was Margaret Thatcher who first put a windfall tax on oil and gas?
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
While acknowledging that or not, please start winding up, Ms Smith.
Liz Smith Con
I can very much acknowledge Gordon Brown’s failure on a windfall tax. On that point, I am happy to conclude my remarks. I move amendment S6M-03042.1, to lea...
Alex Cole-Hamilton (Edinburgh Western) (LD) LD
I am very pleased to rise for my party to speak in favour of the incredibly important motion on a matter that is impacting families up and down the country. ...
The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
We move to the open debate. 15:04
Paul Sweeney (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
It is great privilege to be able to contribute to the debate on the cost of living crisis, which is undoubtedly the single most important issue that millions...
Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (SNP) SNP
One issue that is not listed in the motion is the failure of successive UK Governments in management of the economy. That is of fundamental relevance in a de...
Liz Smith Con
Will the member take an intervention?
Christine Grahame SNP
I have only a very short time. In my time in the Scottish Parliament—more than 20 years—the pension credit system has failed constantly, with 40 per cent of...
Jamie Halcro Johnston (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
It might be worth noting that Norway’s national debt is forecast to be more than $200 billion in 2026. I appreciate Labour’s use of its time today to debate...
Jackie Baillie Lab
Does Jamie Halcro Johnston not recall, as I do, that Boris Johnson promised that he would do that?
Jamie Halcro Johnston Con
I do. I am just coming to that, actually. That is, of course, not a conclusive argument against the policy. The chancellor has today announced proposals to ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I ask you to conclude, please.
Jamie Halcro Johnston Con
That means that, although a young person on the mainland can travel from Berwickshire to Caithness for free, a young person in Orkney or Shetland, whether tr...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I have to ask you to conclude there, Mr Halcro Johnston. We are very tight for time this afternoon. 15:17