Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 15 Apr 2026 – 15 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 18 November 2021

18 Nov 2021 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Shared Prosperity Fund and Levelling Up Agenda
Grant, Rhoda Lab Highlands and Islands Watch on SPTV

I move the amendment in my name.

There is a danger that the debate is set to focus on constitutional wrangling rather than the needs of our constituents. I appeal to SNP and Conservative members not to do that.

Of course, the funds should have been devolved, but the SNP cannot sit on the side of the angels on this matter. When it came into power, the first thing that it did was centralise EU funds that had previously been devolved to local government.

That said, we in the Scottish Labour Party want both of our Governments to work together with councils and communities to tackle the wealth divide. Poverty is increasing—that fact has hardly merited a mention so far in the debate. We want to create a country in which everyone can live life to their full potential, free from the blight of poverty. Therefore, the debate must be about levelling up the regions and tackling age-old wealth divides.

It is fitting that the debate is taking place on international equal pay day, which marks the day in the year when women, on average, effectively stop earning relative to men because of the gender pay gap. It is not just about equal pay for the same job; it is about the fact that jobs that are done predominantly by women are lower paid than those that are done predominantly by men.

The situation is made even worse because women bear the brunt of caring costs. Only last week, in a members’ business debate, we heard how women have been disproportionately affected by long Covid. The week before, we heard about delays in the rolling out of funding for childcare, which is affecting women up and down the country and their ability to work. Women carry out the bulk of caring responsibilities, leading them to be more likely to leave work during the pandemic. They are also more likely to be in part-time work, which is lower paid. The recent cut in universal credit has disproportionately impacted on women because they are more likely to depend on it.

In the Scottish Government’s gender pay gap action plan annual report for 2021, its analysis suggests that the pandemic

“could exacerbate existing labour market inequalities for protected groups including women”.

The report goes on to say:

“As we recover from the pandemic we must ensure that gender equality is mainstreamed into policy design and services so that we protect and advance women’s equality, particularly in relation to tackling poverty, promoting access to and progression within good jobs, and supporting business growth.”

We must tackle regional disparities. The cost of living is significantly higher in rural areas than it is in urban areas. Additional minimum living costs for households in remote rural Scotland can add 15 to 30 per cent to a household budget. Poverty is rife but hidden. Childcare is limited and often difficult to access due to a lack of public transport and a lack of provision. Children get free bus travel to school, to access education, but not for nursery education.

The Scottish Government has recommendations, research, advice and reports on how to improve equality. It must act.

In an attempt to narrow regional inequalities, inclusive growth has been a feature of Scottish Government economic strategies since 2007, yet, as we approach 2022, the SNP Government is no closer to achieving it. Regional inequality in Scotland is not currently being sufficiently addressed by investment from the UK Government’s levelling up fund or by the Scottish Government. That is why Scottish Labour is calling on the Scottish Government to implement new regional equality targets in the national performance framework, in order to tackle employment and skills gaps across regions. Maybe—just maybe—if the SNP had worked with local government on a strategy for levelling up bids, we could have made some progress.

Another drawback is the fact that both of our Governments depend on flawed indicators to identify poverty. Those work well in urban areas but are, frankly, useless in rural areas, where poverty is largely hidden because the very poor live in the same postcode areas as the very rich and are therefore cancelled out.

The levelling up funds are set to replace EU funding, but what they miss—which the EU understood—is the issue of peripherality. We are now in a situation whereby Highland Council and Western Isles Council, with huge pockets of hidden rural poverty, have been downgraded and will not receive funding comparable to what they received in the past from Europe. There must be a better way to ensure that levelling up happens everywhere. In order to have levelling up, there must also be levelling down.

What is not clear is how we must redistribute wealth to ensure that our society receives the levelling that it needs. It is heartbreaking to see people struggle in the grip of poverty while others accrue obscene wealth. The recent debate about second jobs for members of Parliament and members of the Scottish Parliament has brought that into sharp relief. Our society has become more polarised between extreme wealth and extreme poverty, and our public services are no longer coping. Now is the time for action.

We, in the Scottish Labour Party, are asking both of our Governments to set aside their constitutional wrangling, put the best interests of our constituents to the fore and work together to ensure that levelling up becomes a reality for all.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-02158, in the name of Richard Lochhead, on the United Kingdom shared prosperity fund and the UK Governmen...
The Minister for Social Security and Local Government (Ben Macpherson) SNP
This debate is an important opportunity for the Parliament to discuss the future replacement of European Union funding and to consider, with concern, the way...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
The problem that the minister has is that if the UK Government’s shared prosperity fund is so flawed, why are Scottish National Party council leaders across ...
Ben Macpherson SNP
I go back to my point on principles, and I will say more on that in due course. Although additional funding for Scotland will be embraced by regional partner...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
Will the minister give way?
Ben Macpherson SNP
I will give way to Mr Johnson, but then I will have to make some progress.
Daniel Johnson Lab
The minister is right that this is about principles and fairness, but would he not be better arguing that £173 million is inconsequential in terms of tacklin...
Ben Macpherson SNP
Mr Johnson makes that point in good faith but I want to see the Labour Party as the party that was, to its credit, behind the conception of the Scottish Parl...
Stephen Kerr (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister give way on that point?
Ben Macpherson SNP
I will take one last intervention.
Stephen Kerr Con
It is clear that the minister’s sentiment is not shared by Cecil Meiklejohn, who is the leader of Falkirk Council. She welcomed the funding from the UK Gover...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I think that you have made your point, Mr Kerr.
Stephen Kerr Con
The point is that the SNP councils on the ground that are involved with the UK Government are supportive of that additional money.
Ben Macpherson SNP
I touched on that issue in response to Mr Briggs. It is clear that the Scottish Conservatives do not want to stand up for the powers of the Scottish Parliame...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I advise members that time is very tight. I have to ask that interventions be accommodated in the time for members’ speeches. 15:23
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
I start by sending my best wishes to Richard Lochhead for a speedy recovery. I am sorry that the minister has had to come to the chamber with this week’s la...
Dr Alasdair Allan (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP) SNP
I hope that the member will acknowledge at some point that these moneys are not acts of charity but are actually Scottish taxpayers’ moneys.
Miles Briggs Con
Yes, and this is a huge investment in our whole United Kingdom. It is something that we should all welcome. I am glad that the member welcomes it as well. W...
Daniel Johnson Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Miles Briggs Con
I will not have time, unless the Presiding Officer has any time in hand.
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
I do not.
Miles Briggs Con
It is therefore welcome that SNP council leaders across the country have warmly welcomed the funding. In that spirit, I congratulate them on the positive wor...
Ben Macpherson SNP
Will Mr Briggs take an intervention on that point?
Miles Briggs Con
I do not have time. Sorry. From what we see in the motion today, the answer is simply nothing. For 14 years, the SNP Government has taken powers off local a...
Ben Macpherson SNP
Will Mr Briggs acknowledge the unfortunate irony of the Conservatives talking about levelling up when they have presided over a decade of austerity policy, m...
Miles Briggs Con
The only thing that the minister failed to say was that we have also presided over the highest budget that this Parliament and the Scottish Government have e...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Time is tight. I can give a little bit of time back for interventions, so I do not encourage members to think that they cannot take an intervention. However,...
Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) (Lab) Lab
I move the amendment in my name. There is a danger that the debate is set to focus on constitutional wrangling rather than the needs of our constituents. I ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer LD
Thank you, Ms Grant. I do not think that you moved the amendment.
Rhoda Grant Lab
I did so at the start of my speech, but I am happy to move it again.