Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 09 September 2020
I will talk about the specifics of the amendment in my name, such as the “piecemeal” nature of
“the development of hate crime law”,
which has resulted in “fragmented legislation”. It is a simple matter of fact that, for more than a decade, there have been calls for consolidation. The principle of consolidation seems to be widely welcomed and has benefits, as we have seen with legislation on sexual offences.
The amendment refers to the belief that
“freedom of expression is a critically important human right”.
That is a fundamental human right but, of course, it is not an unqualified one. It also says that
“Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) protects”
freedom of expression
“within the context of factors such as the prevention of crime and protecting the rights of others”.
The amendment also recognises that
“stirring up racial hatred has been the basis of criminal offences since 1986.”
We have heard that a couple of times and, as is reiterated in our amendment, that is “clearly compatible with ECHR”. As the Scottish Parliament information centre briefing says, paragraph 5.28 of Lord Bracadale’s report concludes that
“extending the stirring up offences in Scotland would not infringe the article 10 right to freedom of expression”.