Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 13 June 2019

13 Jun 2019 · S5 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Restricted Roads (20 mph Speed Limit) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Ruskell, Mark Green Mid Scotland and Fife Watch on SPTV

Since devolution, there have been choices for the Parliament to make, in order to break from the status quo, be bold and lead the change. From the smoking ban to the minimum pricing of alcohol, the Parliament has led the way in making small changes that will have a big impact on the health of our nation for generations to come.

Today, I am asking Parliament to take another step forward to make our streets and communities permanently safer. Speed limits of 20mph make a big contribution to the safety of everyone on the streets on which we live, especially to the safety of children. They reduce speeds, prevent deaths and injuries and encourage choices to walk and cycle, while public support for them continues to grow year on year. Yet 20mph speed limits remain exceptions to a blanket 30mph rule that was set nearly 90 years ago; they are expensive to introduce and inconsistently applied. It a postcode lottery as to whether a community is protected and our most deprived communities are often left behind.

I am asking Parliament to consider the fundamental question: what should be the default speed limit on the streets on which we live? If the answer to that question is 20mph, the bill is the only credible approach that delivers that goal in a way that is nationally consistent, timely and cost effective.

Over the past three years, I have been delighted to work with a wide range of organisations, including councils, public health bodies, road safety organisations and schools, and many thousands of individuals who back the bill. Public support has been strong—countless studies have shown that the majority of the public supports 20mph limits and that the support goes up when the limits are introduced.

More than 1,900 people responded to the initial consultation on the bill and well over 6,500 people responded to the consultation that the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee ran, which showed 62 per cent support. I particularly thank Rod King and the team at twenty’s plenty for providing support through their extensive networks across the United Kingdom in building the case for the bill.

Last year, I was delighted to be invited to address meetings in Wales, including in the Senedd, where there is now a strong cross-party consensus, with the First Minister recently announcing that Wales will be switching to a 20mph default national limit. The Welsh proposal to allow councils to retain 30mph limits on a minority of roads of their choosing exactly mirrors my bill, and will make Wales the first 20mph nation in the UK.

I also thank councils for their active support: Orkney Islands Council, Shetland Islands Council, Glasgow City Council, the City of Edinburgh Council, Angus Council, East Renfrewshire Council, Dumfries and Galloway Council, Midlothian Council, Renfrewshire Council, Stirling Council, East Dunbartonshire Council, Highland Council, Aberdeen City Council and South Lanarkshire Council have all been strong supporters.

Glasgow City Council recently passed a motion in support of the bill, while the City of Edinburgh Council has said that, had the bill been in place at the time, it would have halved the cost of its 20mph roll-out. Councils that want to make the streets where we live safer want a default 20mph limit. Only a small minority of councils, most notably Scottish Borders Council, are out of step in wanting to choose whether to implement 20mph limits. Why should a child who is growing up on a street in Galashiels deserve any less protection than a child who lives on a street in Edinburgh?

Throughout the development of the bill, my team has also worked closely with the members of the Society of Chief Officers of Transportation in Scotland, which is the representative body of all roads authorities. They are the people who will be directly responsible for implementing the bill. I thank them for their input into the costings and their continued support, which was reaffirmed last night in their formal response to the committee’s report.

Many councils now await the introduction of this bill to make the full roll-out of the 20mph limit cheaper and easier across their communities. On the public health case, I have been delighted to work with organisations including the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, the Glasgow Centre for Population Health, the Faculty of Public Health, the British Heart Foundation, the British Lung Foundation and NHS Scotland; they all back the bill. The Glasgow Centre for Population Health was instrumental in helping us to understand the impact that the bill would have on protecting and saving lives. Its study showed that, even with a modest reduction in average speeds, every year, the bill would save five lives, 750 casualties and £39 million. Real people’s lives will be saved and transformed and real savings will keep coming every year for decades to come—all for the cost of simply changing the road signs.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Christine Grahame) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S5M-17660, in the name of Mark Ruskell, on the Restricted Roads (20 mph Speed Limit) (Scotland) Bill. 15:01
Mark Ruskell (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green) Green
Since devolution, there have been choices for the Parliament to make, in order to break from the status quo, be bold and lead the change. From the smoking ba...
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the member take an intervention?
Mark Ruskell Green
Yes, if I can get the time back.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Yes, you can. There is time in hand in this debate. I can be flexible, which is good for everybody.
Liam Kerr Con
Does the member not concede that that only happens if the impact of the bill is, as he wishes, to reduce the speed limit in practice?
Mark Ruskell Green
That is a basic question and I point the member to the extensive policy memorandum, which details all the studies that show the kind of speed reduction that ...
Edward Mountain (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I am pleased to contribute to the debate as convener of the Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee. The committee’s stage 1 report, which was published on...
John Finnie (Highlands and Islands) (Green) Green
Will the member give way?
Edward Mountain Con
I am prepared to do so, if I can get the time back.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I have already said that there is time in hand for everybody, so do not be feart.
Edward Mountain Con
In giving way, though, I ask the member to remember that I am reflecting the views of the committee, and will do so carefully.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
You have been told, Mr Finnie.
John Finnie Green
I am grateful to the member for taking the intervention. I absolutely accept that that is what the committee convener will do, but will he also point out tha...
Edward Mountain Con
Indeed, and as I make progress through my speech, I will of course try to reflect the difference of opinion between members. On the issue of public health o...
Andy Wightman (Lothian) (Green) Green
Will the member give way?
Edward Mountain Con
I am prepared to do so, on the basis that I outlined earlier.
Andy Wightman Green
The member’s points about compliance and commencement can be addressed as the bill proceeds through Parliament. Does he agree that they are not germane to th...
Edward Mountain Con
I am sure that other members of the committee will comment on that. However, what we heard from Police Scotland is that it does not prioritise enforcement of...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
Will the member give way?
Edward Mountain Con
I am afraid that I have already taken two interventions. Interruption. I think that it is fair to allow the committee convener to try to put the committee’s ...
The Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Infrastructure and Connectivity (Michael Matheson) SNP
First, I thank Mark Ruskell for his member’s bill, which has generated a wide-ranging national debate on 20mph speed limits. I have followed the committee’s...
Andy Wightman Green
The cabinet secretary refers to a “blanket approach”, which reflects the committee’s language about “a one-size-fits-all approach”. Surely, as a matter of pr...
Michael Matheson SNP
The committee’s point was about compliance and effective operation. We must have a default speed limit on which we can get greater levels of compliance. The ...
Alison Johnstone (Lothian) (Green) Green
The cabinet secretary suggests that we should not pass laws unless we are absolutely sure that they will be enforced. Did he take that view when Scotland dec...
Michael Matheson SNP
As I have made clear, the Scottish Government supports the introduction of 20mph zones. However, we do not support a one-size-fits-all blanket approach to al...
Colin Smyth (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Michael Matheson SNP
Let me make progress. To achieve the benefits that 20mph speed limits bring, particularly for road safety, we need to ensure compliance with them. Police Sc...
Daniel Johnson Lab
Will the cabinet secretary please explain why on earth a road whose design is acceptable for a 30mph limit is not appropriate for a 20mph limit? I do not und...
Michael Matheson SNP
In its report, the committee highlights the fact that design features are key factors that influence the speed at which people drive on roads. That is why, f...