Committee
Local Government and Communities Committee 31 October 2018
31 Oct 2018 · S5 · Local Government and Communities Committee
Item of business
Planning (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Good morning. It is great to be back, and I thank the committee for having me. Amendment 208, in my name, concerns the proliferation of housing development in my constituency and in many other constituencies. I should say at the outset that Liberal Democrats are not instinctively or ideologically opposed to new housing—indeed, Edinburgh and Scotland need new housing. Amendment 208 speaks to the correspondence that I have received from many constituents and community groups, and the issue that the amendment covers resonates throughout all local authorities with Liberal Democrat members, who have submitted responses to me during the bill process. Amendment 208 is about strengthening the presumption of the use of brownfield land in housing development. In Edinburgh, for example, brownfield land was owned for development as early as 2003—prior to the crash—but the land has not been built on. Lots of people bought houses in some of the outpost communities that were established, with the expectation that such communities would grow up around them, that schools would be built and that transport infrastructure would be enhanced. However, there was then the economic downturn and developers moved away from plans to develop the land. Instead, developers favoured plans to develop more lucrative green-belt land, where they could exact a higher premium for their purchase. Amendment 208 would spell out to developers that they need to give due consideration to development on brownfield land, and developers would need to give adequate reasons for dismissing such development. The amendment would give local authorities the power to reject a development on greenfield land, if it deems the land to have “intrinsic natural or cultural heritage value”. That speaks to many developments, particularly those in my constituency but in other members’ constituencies, too. I am happy to be here, and I thank the committee for the opportunity to speak to amendment 208.
In the same item of business
The Convener
SNP
Agenda item 2 is day 5 of stage 2 of the Planning (Scotland) Bill. I welcome to the meeting the Minister for Local Government, Housing and Planning, Kevin St...
The Convener
SNP
Amendment 257, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 145 to 147.
The Minister for Local Government, Housing and Planning (Kevin Stewart)
SNP
Good morning, convener. This group of amendments relates to a planning authority’s ability to refuse to even deal with an application. The current provisions...
Claudia Beamish (South Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
Good morning. Amendment 145 aims to increase from two years to 10 years the time period that local authorities would have to deal with multiple similar appli...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
Good progress has been made in the context of Claudia Beamish’s proposals: the minister has moved from his predecessor’s position. I welcome the local exa...
Annabelle Ewing (Cowdenbeath) (SNP)
SNP
Amendment 257 deals with the important issue of serial applications, and I am pleased to note that the minister has responded to concerns that I and, I am su...
Kevin Stewart
SNP
I am happy that Ms Ewing has highlighted the discretion that already exists. I have to say that, at times, it is frustrating for me as the minister to have t...
Claudia Beamish
Lab
Will the minister give way?
Kevin Stewart
SNP
Very briefly.
Claudia Beamish
Lab
The minister says that guidance cannot change the meaning of legislation, but surely it can reflect what the bill says in terms of developing clarity. I beli...
Kevin Stewart
SNP
As I said, guidance cannot change the meaning of primary legislation. That is a matter for the courts. Beyond that, as I have just pointed out, we cannot set...
Monica Lennon
Lab
Will the minister give way?
Kevin Stewart
SNP
Very briefly.
Monica Lennon
Lab
I will be brief, minister. Were the same arguments not levied against your proposal to move from a five-year to a 10-year local development plan cycle, and h...
Kevin Stewart
SNP
There are real differences between what is being proposed here and what was proposed with regard to the local development plan cycle. The idea behind the mov...
The Convener
SNP
The question is, that amendment 306 be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.
The Convener
SNP
There will be a division. For Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab) Simpson, Graham (Central Scotland) (Con) Stewart, Alexander (Mid Scotland and Fife)...
The Convener
SNP
The result of the division is: For 4, Against 3, Abstentions 0. Amendment 306 agreed to.
The Convener
SNP
Amendment 318, in the name of Mark Ruskell, is grouped with amendments 80, 141, 208, 294, 324, 331, 323, 323A, 230, 263 and 335.
Mark Ruskell (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Green)
Green
The inspiration for amendment 318 came from the Scottish Parliament’s first ever inquiry into air quality, which the Environment, Climate Change and Land Ref...
Jeremy Balfour (Lothian) (Con)
Con
Amendment 80 aims to ensure that, when applications are made to a planning authority for planning permission regarding developments of housing that is suitab...
Claudia Beamish
Lab
Amendment 141 is consequential on amendment 140. Committee members and others present might be pleased to hear that I do not intend to move it, because I hav...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con)
Con
Before you do that, I would like to ask about amendment 230. The amendment says that the requirement to provide community open space should apply to any deve...
Claudia Beamish
Lab
I would like to hear other members’ comments before I make a decision about whether to move the amendment. That might seem to contradict what I said about it...
Alex Cole-Hamilton (Edinburgh Western) (LD)
LD
Good morning. It is great to be back, and I thank the committee for having me. Amendment 208, in my name, concerns the proliferation of housing development ...
John Finnie (Highlands and Islands) (Green)
Green
We are discussing the determination of applications, so people might be a bit surprised to see the word “demolition” feature in amendment 294, in my name. Ho...
Graham Simpson
Con
Amendment 324 deals with biodiversity. I have spoken quite a bit about the need to deliver more houses in the right places, but that should not be at the exp...
Mark Ruskell
Green
All that amendment 318 requires is consideration of adequate mitigations. If a road was being built that would be fine, but there would have to be considerat...
Graham Simpson
Con
Yes. It is a question of unintended consequences that could be used to stop things that would be desirable. I have no idea what will happen if the amendment ...
Monica Lennon
Lab
I have not had the chance to speak to Claudia Beamish in detail about her proposal, but we have talked in committee about trying to encourage smaller builder...