Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 28 June 2016

28 Jun 2016 · S5 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
European Union Referendum (Implications for Scotland)
McKelvie, Christina SNP Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Watch on SPTV

We face in Brexit something that I thought we would never have to face. Only a few weeks ago, I said that the leave campaign seemed to have taken leave of its senses, threatening systematic cuts to Scotland’s budget and a reversal of the gains of devolution in the event of Brexit. We are hearing those calls now not just from Lord Owen, but from many others too. Such rhetoric from a key vote leave spokesman has shown the campaign in its true colours—hostile to the Scottish Parliament and to the consensus of Holyrood members and our voters, who voted overwhelmingly in favour of remaining within the European Union.

We also hear Theresa May, a potential candidate to be Prime Minister of this country—of this United Kingdom—say that we need to get out of the European convention on human rights. It is those rights that I will concentrate on today.

On 26 November 1792, Robert Burns wrote:

“While Europe’s eye is fix’d on mighty things,
The fate of Empires and the fall of Kings;
While quacks of State must each produce his plan,
And even children lisp the Rights of Man;
Amid this mighty fuss just let me mention,
The Rights of Woman merit some attention.”

That poem was written around the time of the French revolution. Europe was in turmoil—war was always just around the corner. As that revolution progressed and England witnessed the emergence of popular reform societies advocating parliamentary reform, the aristocratic section of the Whigs began to fear the spread of revolutionary ideology on to home territory. How familiar that is today.

In 1793, the radical Thomas Muir was arrested and transported. He said at a convention in late 1792:

“We do not, we cannot, consider ourselves as mowed and melted down into another country. Have we not distinct Courts, Judges, Juries, Laws ... ?”

Absolutely, Mr Muir. Muir was the architect of a new reform society in Scotland. He opted for a nationwide association of reform clubs unlimited to any social class, something that was not the case elsewhere. The Scottish Association of the Friends of the People was duly formed in Edinburgh.

That brings us to what lies at the heart of this current EU debate—nationhood, citizenship, sovereignty, the rights of every man and woman and the fates of empires. Governments ignoring the will of the people will face the dire consequences of doing so. We do not seek revolution as described by Burns and Muir; we seek enlightenment, sisterhood and self-determination. Also in the 1790s, Thomas Paine was lauded for his “Rights of Man”. Our universal human rights—the citizens’ rights that we cherish so much—are not to be toyed with by any Government.

As members know, I am a true supporter of the European convention on human rights and I will fight for it every step of the way. I believe that we can reform the European Union. We know that to be true because we have done it before. Professor Neil MacCormick was an architect of such reform. He almost pushed Europe to a constitution enshrining our fundamental rights—there we are, back to those rights that are so important. His work pushed forward that reform agenda to what we now call the Lisbon treaty. Without his early work, we would not have that treaty. He is another Scotsman who took up the cause of protecting and extending our fundamental human rights as EU citizens.

Article 18 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union provides that no citizen shall be discriminated against on the basis of nationality. The citizens of member states also have a number of social and employment rights that derive from EU legislation and, following agreement of the treaty of Amsterdam in 1997, the EU treaties have enshrined principles relating to non-discrimination in the areas of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.

As a result, the EU has developed comprehensive legislation in the area of non-discrimination and equality. It began with sex equality in the employment context and has now extended to race, disability, sexual orientation, age and religion or belief in relation to employment and race and sex in relation to the provision of goods and services.

The people of Scotland, through due democratic process, reaffirmed their belief in and support of that European Union. It is only right that this Government be supported by our Parliament to realise the demand placed on it by the people—by the voters.

As stated in articles I-1 and I-2, the union is open to all European states that respect the member states’ common values, which are human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law, respect for human rights, minority rights and the free market. Member states also declare that the following principles prevail in their societies: pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality of the sexes. Those are things that I am happy to pin my name to.

“Gerrard, Palmer, Skirving, Thomas Muir and Margarot,
These are names that every Scottish man and woman ought to know.
When you’re called for jury service, when your name is drawn by lot,
When you vote in an election, when you freely voice your thought,
Don’t take these things for granted, for dearly were they bought.”

It is with all those rights in mind that I support the motion in the name of our Government, and I ask it to devote itself to the cause of the people. It is a good cause, it shall ultimately prevail and it shall finally triumph.

15:30  

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Ken Macintosh) NPA
We will now have a full debate on the European Union referendum. I ask the Cabinet Secretary for Culture, Tourism and External Affairs to move the motion tha...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I ask members who wish to speak in the debate to press their request-to-speak buttons. I also suggest that we allow the opening speakers for each party not t...
Ruth Davidson (Edinburgh Central) (Con) Con
I thank the First Minister for advance notice of her statement. Too often, political events are described as “seismic” or “earth-shattering” when, in truth,...
Kezia Dugdale (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
We live in uncertain times. The social, political and economic order has been turned upside down. It will take many months and years for us to fully grasp th...
Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) Green
I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to a debate that, like others, I wish we did not have to have. I thank the First Minister for providing an ad...
Willie Rennie (North East Fife) (LD) LD
I have lost elections. I took my loss in Dunfermline in 2010 very hard and very personally. However, no election defeat has made me feel like I felt in the e...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I thank members for not intervening on any of the opening speeches.
Neil Findlay (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. The decision last Thursday has huge consequences for all our constituents and for this country. By Friday, Parliament...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I thank Mr Findlay. That is not a point of order, but it was a matter for consideration at the business bureau this morning, and the business managers of all...
Joan McAlpine (South Scotland) (SNP) SNP
I am sure that many members from across the chamber will have been as shocked as I was this morning to hear Lord Forsyth, who was on the board of the Ieave c...
Adam Tomkins (Glasgow) (Con) Con
In my first speech in this Parliament, I said that I wanted the UK to remain in the EU. As such—like most members on the Conservative and all other benches—t...
Mike Rumbles (North East Scotland) (LD) LD
As Adam Tomkins may know, there is not one member in this Parliament who is more pro-UK than me. Given that the First Minister has said that a vote for the m...
Adam Tomkins Con
I think that we should all work together to help the United Kingdom to negotiate what it means by leave, and to maintain and safeguard the interests of Scotl...
Richard Lochhead (Moray) (SNP) SNP
I—like most members, I expect—spent a lot of time at the weekend attending constituency events. Literally thousands of people attended those events, and ever...
Douglas Ross (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
Will Richard Lochhead explain why, given the motion that he supports and is debating, he is the second of the two SNP back-bench speakers to move on to indep...
Richard Lochhead SNP
It would be helpful if, for once, the Conservatives rallied round with all the other parties in the chamber and put the Scottish interest, rather than their ...
Anas Sarwar (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
I voted remain on Thursday because I believed that it was in the best interests of Scotland and the UK to do so. I felt a huge sadness on Friday morning as I...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Linda Fabiani) SNP
Members are starting to allow their speeches to drift a bit over time. I ask members to have a thought about that. 15:25
Christina McKelvie (Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse) (SNP) SNP
We face in Brexit something that I thought we would never have to face. Only a few weeks ago, I said that the leave campaign seemed to have taken leave of it...
Oliver Mundell (Dumfriesshire) (Con) Con
It is easy to listen to the First Minister and her party and think that the European result tells a single story. It does not. It tells 33,551,983 individual...
Patrick Harvie Green
Will the member give way?
Oliver Mundell Con
I have no time. We are keeping strictly to time. In that spirit, I ask all those who voted to remain and who find themselves questioning the democratic proc...
Joan McAlpine SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Oliver Mundell Con
No. Indeed, across Scotland, more than 1 million voters put their cross next to “Leave”—a larger number than put their cross next to Nicola Sturgeon’s name ...
Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab) Lab
In common with many in this chamber and across the country, I was bitterly disappointed at the result of the European Union referendum. It felt akin to a ber...
The Cabinet Secretary for Rural Economy and Connectivity (Fergus Ewing) SNP
Will the member give way?
Jackie Baillie Lab
No, I do not have time; I am in my final minute. Nicola Sturgeon said that the UK had changed, but the EU will also have changed.
Fergus Ewing SNP
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Ms Baillie just said when she refused to take my intervention, Presiding Officer—
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
That is not a point of order, Mr Ewing. It is up to the speaker who she allows to intervene on her.
Fergus Ewing SNP
Well, may I make a point about the courtesy and respect with which members should be treated?