Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 17 Apr 2026 – 17 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 08 March 2016

08 Mar 2016 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill
Swinney, John SNP Perthshire North Watch on SPTV

The issue that I have had to face with regard to this particular situation is the scenario of the UK Government acting in this fashion. Given the proper consideration that is available to this Parliament over taxation matters, the Scottish Government has to respond to ensure that its policy objectives can be protected in this legislative scenario.

I was concerned about the possibility that the opportunity for first-time buyers to get access to property in Scotland could be undermined if we did not have similar provision in place. I quite understand the point that Mr Chisholm is making, which is that the UK Government is free to change its mind on this question, and I accept that it might well do so. However, I have to act on the basis of the legislative scenario that I see opening up in front of me, and the need to protect the policy objectives of the Scottish Government, which have been supported by the way in which land and buildings transaction tax has been implemented, and the benefits that that has given in terms of strengthening the market for first-time buyers.

Without a land and buildings transaction tax supplement in Scotland, it could be more attractive to invest in additional residential properties in Scotland compared to the rest of the UK—particularly at the lower end of the market—making it more difficult for first-time buyers in Scotland to buy a property. That would be contrary to the Scottish Government’s policy of maximising opportunities for first-time buyers to buy their first home.

However, I appreciate that the private rented sector has a key role to play in providing good quality accommodation for those who live in rented accommodation. The Scottish Government has been supporting the purpose-built private rented sector since 2013, funding the study that led to the “Building the Rented Sector in Scotland” report and establishing a dedicated private rented sector champion, tasked with ensuring that action is taken to boost the supply of high-quality private rented sector homes at scale.

I recognise the need to support home ownership and first-time buyers without discouraging significant and beneficial investment in residential property for rent. After reflecting on the stage 1 evidence, I was pleased to positively respond to the Finance Committee’s stage 1 report recommendation that provision should be made within the bill for a 100 per cent relief from the land and buildings transaction tax supplement for buyers purchasing six or more residential properties in one transaction. The Scottish Government lodged a stage 2 amendment to give effect to that decision.

It is estimated that the supplement will raise between £17 million and £29 million in 2016-17, after taking account of behavioural effects, including any impact on underlying LBTT revenues. The Scottish Fiscal Commission has endorsed the estimate as reasonable, recognising the uncertainties posed by the lack of Scottish data on these types of transactions.

The cost of the relief from the supplement for buyers who purchase six or more residential properties in one transaction has not been factored into the aforementioned revenue estimate. As outlined in the supplementary financial memorandum, lodged with the Parliament on 3 March, the Scottish Government has estimated the cost of the relief to be in the region of £2 million in 2016-17 and annually thereafter.

There have been numerous calls for various reliefs from the land and buildings transaction tax supplement. I am firmly of the view that a period of time will be required to enable the supplement to become embedded and for sufficient financial and statistical data to be collected to enable informed policy decisions to be made in future. The position on reliefs with particular reference to the land and buildings transaction tax supplement will be kept under review as part of the on-going process of devolved tax planning and management.

I turn to the subject of a grace period, which was discussed by the Finance Committee and earlier today during stage 3. The Scottish Government lodged a stage 2 amendment, agreed to by the Finance Committee, that allows for the possibility that a person could claim exemption from the supplement in their initial land and buildings transaction tax return. That may be possible where the sale of the previous main residence is completed before the land and buildings transaction tax return for the acquisition of the new main residence has to be submitted. In such circumstances, no supplement would need to be paid.

I acknowledge that that does not provide a solution for all instances where the purchase of a new dwelling takes place before the sale of an old one, because the purchaser will need to submit their tax return in order to register the title to the property. The approach that I have decided to take here is to ask Revenue Scotland to monitor the position from the land and buildings transaction tax supplement provisions coming into force until 30 October 2016. The data collected will enable the Scottish Government—

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Elaine Smith) Lab
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-15837, in the name of John Swinney, on the Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill...
The Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Constitution and Economy (John Swinney) SNP
I am pleased to be opening this stage 3 debate on the Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill—Interruption.
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
Order. I ask members to please leave the chamber quietly.
John Swinney SNP
I thank members of the Finance Committee and the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee for not only their scrutiny of the bill, but their willingness to ...
Malcolm Chisholm (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (Lab) Lab
The cabinet secretary is admitting that the legislation was introduced in response to the actions of the UK Government. How would the Scottish Government rea...
John Swinney SNP
The issue that I have had to face with regard to this particular situation is the scenario of the UK Government acting in this fashion. Given the proper cons...
Gavin Brown (Lothian) (Con) Con
Is the Scottish Government’s advice to solicitors to hold off for a few extra days—or as long as it takes—before submitting that return?
John Swinney SNP
No. That is not the Government’s advice. The Government’s advice to solicitors is to comply with the legislation, as I would expect them to do. However, we w...
Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab) Lab
It seems like no time at all since we were having the stage 1 debate on the land and buildings transaction tax supplement, because, in fact, it was just two ...
Gavin Brown (Lothian) (Con) Con
The Conservatives gave careful thought at all stages to whether to support the bill. There are strong arguments from across the sectors on its flaws and dang...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
We come to the open debate. It will be a short debate, with speeches of a maximum of four minutes. Mark McDonald will be followed by Lesley Brennan. 15:03
Mark McDonald (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP) SNP
It is good to know that, unlike at stage 1, when I was the only speaker in the open debate, I will have some company this time around. A group of schoolchil...
Gavin Brown Con
Will the member give way?
Mark McDonald SNP
I ask Gavin Brown to give me one moment. Gavin Brown is perfectly entitled to disagree with the length of time of the grace period and to advocate for the p...
Gavin Brown Con
Does Mark McDonald genuinely think that the amendment that the cabinet secretary lodged at stage 2 provided for a grace period? Does he think that it would b...
Mark McDonald SNP
I will make a couple of observations. First, the Deputy First Minister has outlined that the amendment that he lodged at stage 2 dealt only with the first pa...
Lesley Brennan (North East Scotland) (Lab) Lab
The housing market is a key component of our economy and, as such, changes to it ought to be considered very carefully. According to Registers of Scotland, a...
John Swinney SNP
I will address some of the comments that have been made. There has been a debate about the supplement provision that the bill will enact. Gavin Brown charact...