Meeting of the Parliament 10 March 2016
At no stage did I use any of the language that Baroness Goldie used when she suggested the reasons why I do not support amendment 29. At no stage did I use the word “tiresome” about financial scrutiny. I have said that I believe that the financial scrutiny is there, by virtue of the current exercise of its functions by Audit Scotland and the fact that I am obliged to operate under fiscal rules, such as the revenue limit, the capital departmental expenditure limits requirement and the fixed borrowing limit, which will be set at £450 million per annum. In fact, we cannot borrow £450 million: we would be prevented from doing so as that would breach our administrative limits.
My point is that I do not see the added value of the proposal in Jackie Baillie’s amendment. I do not think that it is an appropriate role for the Scottish Fiscal Commission and, as I indicated in my responses to interventions, the amendment risks duplicating the roles that are already fulfilled by the Parliament and the Auditor General. Therefore, I ask Jackie Baillie not to press her amendment, failing which I recommend that Parliament does not support it.
17:00