Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 22 March 2016

22 Mar 2016 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Burial and Cremation (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
Stevenson, Stewart SNP Banffshire and Buchan Coast Watch on SPTV

Section 42A is very odd. From reading it, I take it that there are two policy intentions: to protect residential properties that exist from having a crematorium built at the bottom of the garden, so to speak; and to protect the peace and tranquillity of crematoria, which the minister referred to, from the encroachment of nearby residential properties.

The immediate difficulty is that, if those are the policy objectives, section 42A is incomplete in that it does not in any sense prevent the redesignation of something that might be within 200m as a residential property. Therefore, by the way that it has been constructed, the section fails to meet one of the policy objectives.

The second issue that one might consider in relation to protecting the peace and tranquillity of the crematorium and the grounds, which often contain memorials to those who have been cremated, is that section 42A does not address a wide range of other things that might fall within 200m. Let us think about some things that might do that. A school, a play park, a cinema, a theatre, a public house or a restaurant might do so. If we want to protect a crematorium’s peace and tranquillity, we would need to consider that issue and not simply ban residential properties.

Section 42A is not constructed in a way that would delivery adequately on either of the policy objectives. However, the minister—I speak as a former planning minister—makes an excellent point when she says that putting it into primary legislation is an odd way to deal with a planning issue. The national planning guidelines would be a much more appropriate place, because that would leave councils—who are the planning authorities—the discretion to make decisions that are appropriate to the circumstances before them. In particular, circumstances in a rural location may be very different from those that prevail in an urban location.

Perhaps with regret regarding the policy intentions of the person whose amendment inserted section 42A, we must remove the section at this stage and deal with the issue in a more appropriate way, via the planning system.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick) NPA
The next item of business is stage 3 proceedings on the Burial and Cremation (Scotland) Bill. In dealing with the amendments, members should have the bill a...
The Presiding Officer NPA
We move to group 1: meaning of “burial authority” and “burial ground”. Amendment 2, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 3 to 17, 20, 21 a...
The Minister for Public Health (Maureen Watt) SNP
This group of amendments makes a number of changes to references to burial authorities. Most of the changes are consequential on amendment 2, which alters th...
The Presiding Officer NPA
No member has asked to speak on this group of amendments. Does the minister wish to wind up?
Maureen Watt SNP
No. Amendment 2 agreed to. Section 2—Local authority duty to provide burial ground Amendment 3 moved—Maureen Watt—and agreed to. Section 3—Provision of ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
We come next to group 2, which is minor and technical amendments. Amendment 18, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 19, 22, 28, 35, 42, 4...
Maureen Watt SNP
Amendment 18 is a structural change to the bill to move section 20 so that it sits with the sections relating to burial in a burial ground. It will be placed...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Group 3 is on cremation authority duties. Amendment 74, in the name of the minister, is the only amendment in the group.
Maureen Watt SNP
Amendment 74 updates section 37 to put beyond doubt that any regulations that the Scottish ministers make in relation to the operation of a crematorium can i...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Group 4 is on location of crematorium. Amendment 75, in the name of the minister, is the only amendment in the group.
Maureen Watt SNP
The purpose of amendment 75 is to remove from the bill section 42A, which was inserted at stage 2. I said at stage 2 that I considered the kind of statutory...
Stewart Stevenson (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) SNP
Section 42A is very odd. From reading it, I take it that there are two policy intentions: to protect residential properties that exist from having a cremator...
Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) (Lab) Lab
I am concerned about amendment 75. The minister went on at length about planning policy. We would all hope that the planning authority would make reasonable ...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP) SNP
Is Rhoda Grant saying that a local authority would not be concerned about such matters?
Rhoda Grant Lab
I sincerely hope that it would be, but in the past we have seen local authorities make decisions that fly in the face of such concerns. Even in spite of camp...
John Wilson (Central Scotland) (Ind) Ind
The amendment that inserted section 42A at stage 2 was lodged to address an issue that had been identified by the Local Government and Regeneration Committee...
Stewart Stevenson SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
John Wilson Ind
No. “We therefore recommend the Scottish Government takes cognisance of the issues raised and, in discussion with planning colleagues, brings forward an ame...
Kevin Stewart (Aberdeen Central) (SNP) SNP
A number of issues have been raised. We often find that there is conflict between different pieces of legislation. In this case, the conflict is between the ...
John Wilson Ind
Will Mr Stewart confirm that he was the convener of the Local Government and Regeneration Committee that produced the stage 1 report that asked the Scottish ...
Kevin Stewart SNP
I was the convener of the committee, and I suggested that that be looked at. Mr Wilson’s stage 2 amendment could have been better worded, if it was intended ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call the minister to wind up.
Maureen Watt SNP
It is true that local authorities agree with a minimum distance, but they believe that they should make the decision. The Institute of Cemetery and Crematori...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The question is, that amendment 75 be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. As this is the first division at stage 3, I suspend the meeting for five minutes. 10:31 Meeting suspended. 10:36 On resuming—
The Deputy Presiding Officer (John Scott) Con
We will now proceed with the division on amendment 75. For Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP) Adamson, Clare (Central Scotland) (SNP) Allan, Dr Alasdair (Na ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Con
The result of the division is: For 61, Against 38, Abstentions 0. Amendment 75 agreed to. Section 46—Arrangements on death of adult
The Deputy Presiding Officer Con
We come to group 5. Amendment 23, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 24 to 27, 29, 31 to 33, 36, 38, 41, 43, 45 to 54, 91, 92, 55 to 57 ...
Maureen Watt SNP
In themselves, the amendments in this group do not have any impact on the meaning of the sections to which they relate; they are technical drafting amendment...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Con
We come to group 6. Amendment 76, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 77 to 80, 30, 81 to 86, 86A, 87, 88, 34, 37, 39, 40, 89, 90, 93, 58...