Meeting of the Parliament 16 March 2016
I hear what the member says, but if he had listened to my contribution when we were discussing amendments, he would have heard me quoting the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, which said that more than 80 per cent of shooting businesses operate at a loss. I call that price sensitive.
I believe that the bill will hurt the wee man, and that is certainly the case with part 10 of the bill, on agricultural holdings, because the losers in what the Government is now proposing, through its relinquishing and assignation measures, will be the very people who were supposed to be the winners—the new entrants, the young farmers and those who are trying to progress on the farming ladder.
The main policy aim of the bill was to create an environment within which those with land to let are encouraged to let it, but I believe that the impact of assignation for value—as was recognised by the agricultural holdings legislation review group, which was chaired by the cabinet secretary himself—will be stagnation in the sector, the mothballing of a sterile and inflexible letting vehicle and a massive reluctance among those with land to let to do so on any kind of long-term, or even short-term, basis.
The tenanted sector, as we know it, will start its terminal decline at decision time this evening. There will be those who welcome that decline, but I am not among them.