Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 16 March 2016

16 Mar 2016 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

An issue that the Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment Committee raised in our consultation on the Scottish Government’s draft proposals was the need to take evidence from communities about the effectiveness of the guidance that will sit alongside the legislation. A clear lesson from the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 was that the guidance did not always assist communities in the way in which it was intended to do, because of how it was drafted and interpreted.

My aim in lodging amendments 57 and 58 was to ensure that the need to learn lessons from the implementation of this next stage of the land reform story is captured effectively and that ministers are able to consider the issue and change the guidance as they see fit, to improve its success.

As a result of amendments that I lodged to part 4 of the bill at stage 2, the Scottish ministers will be required to prepare and lay before the Parliament a report that assesses the extent to which section 37 guidance is being followed, no later than three years after the date on which the first part 4 guidance is issued. Subsequent reports are to be laid no later than three years after the date of the previous report. The committee accepted my amendments in that regard, and the minister supported them on the basis that the Scottish Government would welcome further discussion on how to strengthen the provisions and on the most appropriate review period.

Following further discussion with the minister, I am delighted that amendment 57 will strengthen the purpose of the report, so that, rather than simply assessing the extent to which part 4 guidance is being followed, it will assess the effectiveness of the guidance and set out the Scottish ministers’ views on further steps that they think should be taken to improve the effectiveness of the guidance. Amendment 58 will change the review period to within five years, rather than three, for all subsequent reports, to align with parliamentary terms. However, the first report must still be laid within three years of the date on which the first part 4 guidance is issued.

I am pleased that we have been able to have constructive discussions and I hope that members will be keen to support amendments 57 and 58, which will enable us to achieve momentum and make progress in the next parliamentary session.

I move amendment 57.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Elaine Smith) Lab
The next item of business is continuation of stage 3 proceedings on the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill. I remind members that, in dealing with the amendments,...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
We move to group 7. Amendment 57, in the name of Sarah Boyack, is grouped with amendment 58.
Sarah Boyack Lab
An issue that the Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment Committee raised in our consultation on the Scottish Government’s draft proposals was the nee...
Michael Russell SNP
I warmly support amendments 57 and 58 in the name of Sarah Boyack. Part 4 is one of the shortest parts of the bill and in my view should have benefited from ...
Paul Wheelhouse SNP
We welcomed Sarah Boyack’s amendments at stage 2, which created a requirement to report on the extent to which part 4 guidance is being followed. We support...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
I invite Sarah Boyack to wind up and to intimate whether she intends to press or withdraw her amendments.
Sarah Boyack Lab
I welcome the comments from members across the chamber. I think that we all broadly agree on the importance of the amendments. I press amendment 57, and I ho...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
We move to group 8. Amendment 60, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 68 to 71, 96 and 97.
Paul Wheelhouse SNP
Amendments 60, 96 and 97 adjust the requirements on community bodies that exercise the right to buy under the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill and the Land Reform...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
We come to group 9. Amendment 7, in the name of Michael Russell, is grouped with amendments 107, 108, 8, 61, 62, 9, 109, 63 to 65, 10, 11, 66 and 67.
Michael Russell SNP
Amendment 7 seeks to avoid unintended consequences in public or community purchases of land. I hope that I will not want to press the amendment to a vote, as...
Alex Fergusson Con
My amendments 107 and 109 would simply provide an improved alternative to Mike Russell’s amendments 7 and 9. Whereas Mike Russell’s amendments apply only ...
Dave Thompson SNP
In the debate later on this afternoon, I will comment on the comments that Mr Fergusson made about the ECHR. He quoted me out of context, and I hope that he ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
I invite the minister to speak to amendment 61 and other amendments in the group. 15:00
Paul Wheelhouse SNP
I will speak first to Mr Russell’s amendments 7 and 9 and Mr Fergusson’s amendments 107 and 109 together. Unfortunately, if accepted, those amendments could ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
I will allow Claudia Beamish to make a short contribution.
Claudia Beamish Lab
Thank you, Presiding Officer. I would like to speak in support of amendment 67. I am pleased that the amendment has been lodged because, as the minister hig...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
I invite Mike Russell to wind up and indicate whether he intends to press or withdraw amendment 7.
Michael Russell SNP
Thank you, Presiding Officer. I will be very brief. I, too, am very pleased that equalities and other human rights issues have been included in part 5. I am...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
The question is, that amendment 107 be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
There will be a division. As this is the first division of the afternoon, I suspend Parliament for five minutes. 15:11 Meeting suspended. 15:16 On resuming—
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
We will now proceed with the division on amendment 107. For Brown, Gavin (Lothian) (Con) Buchanan, Cameron (Lothian) (Con) Carlaw, Jackson (West Scotla...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
The result of the division is: For 20, Against 96, Abstentions 0. Amendment 107 disagreed to. Amendment 108 moved—Alex Fergusson.
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
The question is, that amendment 108 be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
There will be a division. For Brown, Gavin (Lothian) (Con) Buchanan, Cameron (Lothian) (Con) Carlaw, Jackson (West Scotland) (Con) Davidson, Ruth (Gl...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
The result of the division is: For 20, Against 96, Abstentions 0. Amendment 108 disagreed to. Amendment 8 moved—Dave Thompson.
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
The question is, that amendment 8 be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
There will be a division. For Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP) Adamson, Clare (Central Scotland) (SNP) Allan, Dr Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP) Al...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
The result of the division is: For 95, Against 20, Abstentions 0. Amendment 8 agreed to. Amendments 61 and 62 moved—Paul Wheelhouse—and agreed to. Amen...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
The question is, that amendment 109 be agreed to. Are we agreed? Members: No.