Meeting of the Parliament 10 March 2016
The journey on fiscal forecasts has indeed been a rich tapestry, but I am delighted to say that we are getting there in the end.
The change is probably the most important change that needed to be made to the bill. It is quite right that official forecasts should be carried out by the Fiscal Commission and not by the Scottish Government. There are a number of reasons for that. Most important, the forecasts have to be independent and have to be seen to be independent.
The amendments will also get rid of a rather weak reasonableness test that would not offer much scrutiny. They will get rid of the messing about with economic determinants for non-domestic rates and look at the non-domestic rates themselves, and they will avoid, or at least weaken, the built-in optimism bias that any Government that produces forecasts is at risk of producing.
For all those reasons, I support all John Swinney’s amendments in the group.
As I said, we got there in the end. I hoped that we would get there at stage 2, but I failed to convince the cabinet secretary. I was just not quite up to the mark in convincing Mr Swinney, but I am glad to say that George Osborne was up to the mark: he managed to convince John Swinney about the right way to go. Thank goodness for the persuasive powers of George Osborne.
16:45