Meeting of the Parliament 08 March 2016
My comments on Chic Brodie’s previous amendments apply equally in this instance. I will not repeat myself; we will support the amendments in this group as well.
On Liz Smith’s amendment 1, we will have an opportunity to discuss the diversity in our HE sector in detail later. That diversity is a feature within as well as across the different institutions. We wish to see that diversity reflected in the way in which our universities are governed, but there are real risks in adopting legislation that is overly prescriptive and detailed. A one-size-fits-all approach is not appropriate, and we should look to build in flexibility where we can.
In essence, that is what amendment 1 aims to do. It does not try to second-guess to the nth degree every aspect of the role to be performed by the senior lay member of a governing body; it recognises that each institution will vary and therefore the functions of the senior lay member may vary accordingly. Moreover, ensuring that there is a proper balance of authority between the governing body and the principal of an institution is a corporate responsibility of the governing body as a whole. It cannot be personalised to apply to the rector or the senior lay member alone. In that respect, amendment 1 better reflects what happens and what should continue to happen.
15:45