Meeting of the Parliament 08 March 2016
During stage 1 evidence, the cabinet secretary made it clear to the Education and Culture Committee that it was not the Government’s intention, through the bill, to affect the role of the rector at the five institutions where such a role exists. It was always difficult to see how that could be achieved and, sadly, after the amendments that were passed at stage 2 on elected chairs, it is now beyond the cabinet secretary’s ability to honour that commitment. That is a source of regret. However, the priority at this stage must be to provide what clarity we can to the respective roles of rector and senior lay governor.
There is still too much of an overlap and duplication, as Liz Smith said, which is giving rise to the potential for confusion and even conflict. The concern is not confined to Opposition members. Chic Brodie deserves credit for his work in the committee to highlight the problems and, more important, for his efforts to help dig the cabinet secretary out of the hole that she has dug for herself.
The amendments might not entirely address the problem, but that is hardly Mr Brodie’s fault. Rightly, he seeks to properly distinguish the respective roles and ensure that anyone who chairs a governing body has the confidence and support of that body’s members. On that basis, I am happy to confirm our support for amendments 27 and 31.