Meeting of the Parliament 25 February 2016
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Under rule 8.17.1 of the standing orders I wish to challenge the Presiding Officer’s ruling on the non-selection of the Labour amendment for this debate. That is a regrettable decision that restricts debate on the important matter of protecting public services, and it follows on from the Presiding Officer’s decision not to select any of the amendments that were lodged for the stage 3 debate yesterday on the Budget (Scotland) (No 5) (Bill) from Labour, the Liberal Democrats or the Greens.
On both occasions, I asked the Presiding Officer for an explanation. The Presiding Officer emailed to say that she does not publish explanations in such circumstances. That is disappointing, and the approach lacks transparency.
I ask that the decision be reconsidered, even at this late stage. I also ask for a review of the procedures for publication of the reasons for the non-selection of amendments where a legitimate query is raised.