Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 23 February 2016

23 Feb 2016 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
"SNAP: Scotland’s National Action Plan for Human Rights—Year Two Report"

It is a pleasure to participate in today’s debate to mark the publication of the second annual report on Scotland’s national action plan for human rights. SNAP is a road map for collective action across Scotland to make human rights a reality for everyone.

The Scottish Human Rights Commission described SNAP’s first year as being mainly about “setting the stage”. Since then, however, SNAP has moved “off the page” in the action that has been taken to ensure that human rights become very much a reality for everyone. To achieve that objective, a diverse range of events and “hub” and “spoke” projects have been adopted on health, justice, housing and other areas. However, while significant progress has been made during the two years since SNAP was launched, it is fair to say that there is still much more to be done. In particular, the report points out that

“A step-change is needed across the Scottish public sector”

and that

“those in power with a responsibility to protect, respect and fulfil people’s rights must step up to discharge their duties.”

The SHRC says that that, in turn, means that SNAP

“must become firmly embedded in Scotland’s institutional fabric rather than sitting separately in a silo.”

That joined-up, holistic approach makes sense. It can be seen in the efforts that have been made so far to cement it in the foundations of Scotland’s public services. One striking example of that is the mechanism that SNAP has become for holding Police Scotland to account. That is good news, given the now self-evident absence of proper and effective oversight of the single force. That issue was warned against by the Scottish Conservatives and was a major factor in our rejecting the creation of Police Scotland in the first place.

It is very much to be welcomed that accountability here is being delivered through SNAP in a number of ways, including the SNAP accountability round-table events that have been held over the past year. Those events have focused on justice and safety, and have covered Police Scotland’s commitment to embed human rights in the structures and culture of policing.

The commission recognises that people in Scotland do not know a lot about their rights. It is therefore extremely positive that a dedicated round-table meeting was held to examine how Police Scotland can ensure that the experience of everyone who comes into contact with the police is underpinned by a recognition of their human rights. It is also positive that a separate session was held on proportionality in stop and search and the use of force.

In addition, the SHRC’s action in July last year in reporting the disproportionate use of consensual stop and search to the United Nations Human Rights Committee helped to concentrate the Scottish Government’s mind on ending the controversy.

There is no doubt that, by focusing attention on those issues through SNAP, the SHRC is helping to provide the vital checks and balances that are by and large absent under a Scottish Parliament majority Government. As Professor Miller explained in his recent evidence to the Justice Committee:

“A lot of the earlier work of the commission had to be about increasing awareness and understanding of how to apply human rights on a day-to-day basis ... We are getting to a stage where those bodies have to be increasingly held to account—where they actually need to do it.”—[Official Report, Justice Committee, 26 January 2016; c 38.]

In my closing remarks, I will say more about Professor Miller’s outstanding record as the chair of the SHRC.

As the new parliamentary session approaches, it is imperative that the Parliament continues to support SNAP and that Professor Miller’s impressive legacy is delivered through his successor, Judith Robertson, when she takes up her position as the new chair of the SHRC.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick) NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-15645, in the name of Christine Grahame, on behalf of the Justice Committee, on Scotland’s national actio...
Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (SNP) SNP
I rise to speak on behalf of the Justice Committee and am pleased to speak on the progress of SNAP, Scotland’s national action plan for human rights, which i...
The Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, Communities and Pensioners’ Rights (Alex Neil) SNP
I thank Christine Grahame and the Justice Committee for promoting the debate. It provides a timely opportunity to reflect on the journey that we have all tak...
Graeme Pearson (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I thank Christine Grahame for introducing this afternoon’s debate. I identify entirely with the comments of the cabinet secretary and of the convener of the ...
Margaret Mitchell (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
It is a pleasure to participate in today’s debate to mark the publication of the second annual report on Scotland’s national action plan for human rights. SN...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Elaine Smith) Lab
We turn to the open debate. Speeches should be four minutes, please. 15:21
Christina McKelvie (Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse) (SNP) SNP
I am very happy to speak in this debate. I add my voice to the voices of everybody else in the chamber in congratulating Professor Alan Miller on getting out...
Elaine Murray (Dumfriesshire) (Lab) Lab
When Professor Alan Miller, the outgoing chair of the Scottish Human Rights Commission, came before the Justice Committee, he explained to us that, in develo...
Margaret Mitchell Con
I thank all members who have contributed to a good debate this afternoon. From the tenor of the speeches, it is clear that there is a strong degree of consen...
Christine Grahame SNP
Well done.
Margaret Mitchell Con
As Professor Miller prepares to step down from the SHRC at the end of March, I wish him every success in his future endeavours. Even in its fledgling first ...
Graeme Pearson Lab
I am pleased to close on behalf of the Scottish Labour Party. I am also pleased to recognise the tone of the contributions from all sides of the chamber. Thi...
Christine Grahame SNP
I agree with that, but a lot is about what happens in practice. If people at work on the front line, in policing, hospitals or schools, or even in our shops,...
Graeme Pearson Lab
I acknowledge what the member has said. The lead from Government not only in saying those things but in ensuring that they are delivered will give the indivi...
Alex Neil SNP
Although this has been a truncated debate, it has nevertheless been one in which there is a broad consensus across the chamber on the importance of human rig...
Margaret Mitchell Con
The cabinet secretary will recognise that Scotland has the power to implement human rights. Does he accept that there are various instances of the UK’s havin...
Alex Neil SNP
That exemplifies the tragedy that, although a lot of progress has been made in some areas, the Trade Union Bill is travelling in the opposite direction. The ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
I call John Finnie to wind up the debate on behalf of the Justice Committee. 15:46
John Finnie (Highlands and Islands) (Ind) Ind
I am delighted to close the debate on behalf of the Justice Committee. I thank all participants for their contributions; it has been a largely consensual deb...