Meeting of the Parliament 23 February 2016
Bruce Crawford is right to outline the breadth of support that there is for the Scottish Government’s position. Let me say, though, that what has mattered and will continue to matter to the Scottish Government is the outcome that we reach. We have put forward a proposal that we think best delivers that outcome, but it is the outcome rather than the precise route to the outcome that is the most important thing of all. I hope that we can reach agreement with the Treasury, and I hope that we can do that sooner rather than later.
A couple of weeks ago, I spoke to the Prime Minister by telephone. I think that it is entirely understandable that he has been engaged in other matters over the last week or so. However, I am very clear that if we do not manage to reach agreement with the Treasury on the key issue of the principle of no detriment, it will be incumbent on the Prime Minister to seek—with me—to reach an agreement that delivers the promise that he made. I remind the chamber and the wider public that that promise—the vow that we are talking about—is not my vow; it is the Prime Minister’s vow and it is incumbent on him to deliver it.