Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 17 Apr 2026 – 17 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 11 February 2016

11 Feb 2016 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Community Justice (Scotland) Bill

I am grateful to members for their contributions to the debate. The thoughtful nature of the speeches from around the chamber marks the way in which the committee and other members have engaged in developing the bill. I agree with members that it is a stronger bill now than when we started. That is a tribute to everyone’s work.

As Dr Murray stated, the brevity of the debate is an inaccurate measure of the bill’s importance. I fully agree with her that it has profound implications for the delivery of justice in Scotland. As I said in my opening remarks, the bill has enjoyed strong cross-party support from the start. It is clear that there is a great deal of interest in community justice across the chamber, and I welcome Margaret Mitchell’s comment that the Conservatives will support the bill.

In responding to members’ comments, I will focus on a number of key issues. I will start with the biggest issues, which relate to TUPE and funding, and then cover the rest as we go on. I apologise to Margaret Mitchell for not addressing those issues in my earlier remarks.

The Scottish ministers are satisfied that the bill does not create a Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations situation for community justice Scotland. The functions of the CJAs will not transfer to community justice Scotland when it is established, so the employees of CJAs will not automatically move to community justice Scotland under the operation of TUPE or the Cabinet Office statement of practice. Whether TUPE would apply to the transfer of CJA employees to local authorities will be a matter for local authorities as potential employers to consider.

The no compulsory redundancy policy to which a number of members referred applies to staff of bodies that are covered by the public sector pay policy. CJAs were established as new local government bodies to facilitate the co-ordinated delivery of community justice services by local authorities across local authority areas. As CJAs are local government bodies, their employees are not subject to the public sector pay policy or the no compulsory redundancy policy.

However, my officials are working with the CJAs and local authorities to ensure that staffing arrangements at the community justice authorities are managed to minimise as far as possible any job losses when CJAs are disestablished and that, where that cannot be avoided, staff will be appropriately compensated. We have been considering closely the terms and conditions to ensure that everybody receives fair treatment in respect of those matters.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (John Scott) Con
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-15607, in the name of Paul Wheelhouse, on the Community Justice (Scotland) Bill. 14:56
The Minister for Community Safety and Legal Affairs (Paul Wheelhouse) SNP
I start by thanking everyone who contributed to the development of the Community Justice (Scotland) Bill, including members of all parties, all our stakehold...
Elaine Murray (Dumfriesshire) (Lab) Lab
On behalf of Scottish Labour, I thank the clerks, the witnesses, the legislation team, Scottish Government officials and the minister for their contributions...
Margaret Mitchell (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
I welcome this stage 3 debate on the Community Justice (Scotland) Bill, the final version of which is quite different from and a great improvement on the ver...
Roderick Campbell (North East Fife) (SNP) SNP
It is perhaps worth reflecting on the history of the bill, which was born from the commission on women offenders report in particular, and also the Audit Sco...
Margaret McDougall (West Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I am particularly pleased to be taking part in the stage 3 debate on the bill because this is the first bill that I have seen through from start to finish si...
Alison McInnes (North East Scotland) (LD) LD
It is almost four years since the commission on women offenders published its report. Of its 37 recommendations, only one gave me serious pause for thought: ...
Gil Paterson (Clydebank and Milngavie) (SNP) SNP
It is a pleasure to speak in this stage 3 debate on the Community Justice (Scotland) Bill. Being a current member of the Justice Committee, I have seen the b...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Elaine Smith) Lab
We turn to the closing speeches. I call Margaret Mitchell, who has five minutes, please. 15:36
Margaret Mitchell Con
Although the Scottish Government’s amendments at stage 2 have done much to improve the bill, I consider it an opportunity lost to have removed from its scope...
Graeme Pearson (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to the debate. First of all, I will allude to a number of the key points that were raised during the earlier ...
Paul Wheelhouse SNP
I am grateful to members for their contributions to the debate. The thoughtful nature of the speeches from around the chamber marks the way in which the comm...
Margaret Mitchell Con
Is it possible that there could still be some compulsory redundancies?
Paul Wheelhouse SNP
I will happily come back to the member on that. Detailed negotiations are taking place at local level, and there are different policies in place across the e...