Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 07 January 2016

07 Jan 2016 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Scottish Elections (Dates) Bill: Stage 1

I absolutely acknowledge what the member says. I am merely raising the point that, in future, a situation might arise in which we decide to revisit that—who knows? I am merely saying that we should perhaps be open to that.

As we have heard, Dr Richard Simpson called for the Scottish elections to be held on the same day as the European elections. Although there is merit in that suggestion, the committee heard that it is not possible as a result of a clause in the Scotland Bill following the Smith commission recommendations. To a degree, holding more than one election on the same day provides the opportunity to increase turnout in an election that usually receives lower participation. I can understand Dr Richard Simpson’s thinking, as only 33.5 per cent of the Scottish electorate took part in the European elections in 2014, despite the increased attention on those elections as a result of the referendum campaign. The referendum then attracted a record 85 per cent turnout. In last year’s general election, the turnout was 71 per cent and, at the election in a few months, we can expect a turnout of anything from 65 per cent upwards.

As I said, the options of a three-year and five-year term both have merits. The most obvious advantage of a five-year term is that of avoiding a clash with the UK general election in 2020. A five-year term also provides stability for Government and for long-term strategic planning, and allows for parties to fully develop policy ideas. One academic to whom I spoke warned that the present system of elections almost every year means that parties are constantly either preparing for or running election campaigns, which leaves them with little time to spend on policy development, the real work of government or, indeed, the work of opposition.

The disadvantages of a five-year term include issues around accountability and there being fewer opportunities for the electorate to engage in holding the Government to account. If the same party was in government for two consecutive terms, that would result in 10 years instead of eight in government, as is the norm around the world.

With the bill containing two small provisions and no issues surrounding the timing of the next Scottish election following the election in May, I repeat that Scottish Labour fully supports the principles behind the bill and will support it throughout its parliamentary process.

14:50  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (John Scott) Con
Good afternoon, everyone. The first item of business this afternoon is a debate on motion S4M-15221, in the name of Joe FitzPatrick, on the Scottish Election...
The Minister for Parliamentary Business (Joe FitzPatrick) SNP
I am pleased to open this afternoon’s debate on the general principles of the Scottish Elections (Dates) Bill. The bill is very short and straightforward, an...
John Wilson (Central Scotland) (Ind) Ind
I take on board what is proposed in the bill, but would it not be simpler for the Government to introduce proposals to revert to elections every five years f...
Joe FitzPatrick SNP
That is an interesting point and I will come to it later in my speech. I turn to the discussions that we had at stage 1 and the stage 1 report from the Stan...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Con
I call Stewart Stevenson to speak on behalf of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. You have six minutes or thereby, Mr Stevenson. 1...
Stewart Stevenson (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) SNP
I am pleased to speak on behalf of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. I hope that the Minister for Parliamentary Business did not c...
Mary Fee (West Scotland) (Lab) Lab
In opening for Scottish Labour, I say at the outset that we support the principles of the Scottish Elections (Dates) Bill, which outlines the dates for the S...
John Wilson Ind
Does the member accept that, in the previous session of Parliament, the Gould report recommended complete separation of local government and Scottish Parliam...
Mary Fee Lab
I absolutely acknowledge what the member says. I am merely raising the point that, in future, a situation might arise in which we decide to revisit that—who ...
Annabel Goldie (West Scotland) (Con) Con
I, too, offer my thanks to the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee for its work in bringing forward the stage 1 report. Mr Stevenson off...
Stuart McMillan (West Scotland) (SNP) SNP
I welcome the chance to take part in this short debate and I express my thanks to committee members for such a succinct report. Members often highlight the f...
Anne McTaggart (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
I am delighted to contribute to the debate, as I believe that this is an important issue for everyone in the chamber. The Scottish Elections (Dates) Bill wi...
Annabel Goldie Con
It is clear that the bill will gain broad support today. It is also important that it has COSLA’s approval, as the minister suggested to the committee that i...
James Kelly (Rutherglen) (Lab) Lab
I am pleased to have the opportunity to close, on behalf of the Scottish Labour Party, this afternoon’s stage 1 debate on the Scottish Elections (Dates) Bill...
Stewart Stevenson SNP
I am making this intervention in a personal capacity and not as the convener of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. The member might...
James Kelly Lab
I take that point. The discussion is actually quite interesting. There were two general elections in 1974, so we have been here before. Annabel Goldie mad...
John Wilson Ind
Is Mr Kelly implying that the European Parliament elections and Westminster elections are less democratic because they involve five-year terms?
James Kelly Lab
No—I am certainly not saying that. I am saying that there is a case for four-year terms, just as there is a case for five-year terms. Five-year terms provide...
Joe FitzPatrick SNP
I thank all members who took part in the debate for their contributions. The bill is incredibly short and there is clear consensus about what we should do no...