Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 17 December 2015

17 Dec 2015 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament (Amendment) Bill

I do not propose to take too much time to comment on the details of the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament (Amendment) Bill.

It will probably come as no surprise to hear that the Government continues to give the bill its full support. I congratulate the members of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee and, indeed, its clerks. The committee has made excellent and rapid use of the relevant powers that have been made available to the Parliament under the Scotland Act 2012.

The preparatory work to underpin the policy reforms in the bill was carefully considered and has led to a robust framework. That was added to by the amendments that the convener of the committee mentioned. Obviously, it is worth noting that the bill is a committee bill. We do not have such bills too often, so it is useful to highlight that fact. Committee bills are a useful tool in our parliamentary processes, and it was appropriate that a committee bill was introduced.

During the stage 1 debate, members across the chamber stood together behind the proposals, and I have no reason to consider that that position will change today. It is not often that a bill receives such unified support, and that deserves special mention.

At stage 1, I summarised my broad assessment of what the bill delivers. There are three main things from the Government’s perspective.

First, the bill seeks to establish measures to enhance members’ accountability to the public and to reflect the latest views on what constitutes appropriate probity standards. Secondly, in looking to standardise arrangements for reporting interests, it streamlines the activity that is required of members and offers the public a single point of reference. It ends the dual reporting that the convener talked about. Thirdly, it offers the Parliament flexibility in the event that circumstances ever arise that necessitate enforcement activity.

The bill aimed high in seeking to produce a comprehensive review of existing practices. Any one of those three major areas would have been significant in the first place, so we really cannot overestimate the amount of work that went into producing the bill and pulling together the three different strands.

I consider that every member of the Parliament will benefit as a result of the changes, be that in demonstrating their accountability to their electorate or from the streamlined reporting processes.

The proposal to end dual reporting is a significant step forward. I commend the committee for its commitment to that move and the benefits that it should deliver for members of the Scottish Parliament and members of the public.

The measures in the bill are not just symbolic reforms; they can be characterised as practical improvements that can be realised from the start of the next parliamentary session.

The Government welcomes the commitment that the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee has shown, and I look forward to the bill being passed at decision time.

16:04  

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (John Scott) Con
The next item of business is a debate on S4M-15201, in the name of Stewart Stevenson, on the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament (Amendment) Bill...
Stewart Stevenson (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) SNP
There is always a benefit in reviewing, with a critical eye, the regimes that govern our work and that of individual members here in Parliament. The bill’s ...
The Minister for Parliamentary Business (Joe FitzPatrick) SNP
I do not propose to take too much time to comment on the details of the Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament (Amendment) Bill. It will probably c...
Mary Fee (West Scotland) (Lab) Lab
This is a short but nevertheless important debate on the interests of members of the Scottish Parliament. Across the chamber we all agree that we need robust...
Mary Scanlon (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I associate myself with the comments made by Mary Fee. I also thank Stewart Stevenson and the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee for bri...
The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick) NPA
We all need to learn from you, Mrs Scanlon.
Mary Scanlon Con
If I am invited out to dinner and my UHI hosts highlight the fact that lecturers in the Highlands are paid £7,000 below lecturers elsewhere in Scotland, and ...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call Stewart Stevenson to wind up the debate. 16:11
Stewart Stevenson SNP
Let me start with the point that Mary Scanlon has made, which is a fair and proper one, by addressing the example that she gives of any of us being out to di...
Mark McDonald (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP) SNP
Are we all invited?
Stewart Stevenson SNP
Invitations are now closed. Mary Fee dealt more than adequately with the subject of the sanctions that are being introduced and with the broad sanction regi...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Thank you very much, Mr Stevenson. I do not expect an answer just now, but perhaps when the Lobbying (Scotland) Bill is debated you can tell me whether, if S...