Meeting of the Parliament 16 September 2015
I must say that, when Malcolm Chisholm said that there were two issues with Lord Sewel, I thought that he handled the issue very delicately indeed.
I had forgotten that, as the Deputy First Minister reminded us, we were 10 weeks in that hot room, sweating over something that just does not seem to be loved, so I do not quite know where I will ever get that time back again.
The Government’s motion appears to be a straightforward endorsement of the Devolution (Further Powers) Committee’s work on the current Scotland Bill, so I have been a little surprised that the SNP appears to have wanted to use such an endorsement as a trigger to veto the bill in radio interviews that have been taking place this week, and indeed as a condition for a second independence referendum.
I am puzzled by that because Mr Swinney’s Government threatened the Scotland Act 2012 with a veto but ultimately the Government accepted more powers, which the act devolved. I cannot see the circumstances in which the nationalist Government here in Edinburgh would veto more powers for this Parliament. I totally accept the Deputy First Minister’s point on the fiscal framework—that is a separate matter—but I struggle to imagine circumstances in which this Parliament would not gain by having more powers.