Meeting of the Parliament 09 February 2012
I thank the cabinet secretary for advance sight of his statement and empathise with his struggle against the man flu.
I associate myself entirely with the cabinet secretary’s comments about the importance of high-quality teaching to the success of our education system. He seems to accept that the need that gave rise to the creation of the chartered teacher scheme still exists and that such teachers add value. Why, then, is he unwilling to develop and enhance the existing scheme and would rather rip it up and start again?
The cabinet secretary has accepted the valuable contribution that external experts can and do make, but states that
“Teaching should be done by teachers.”
We know that he rejects the Renfrewshire model, but can he be a little more precise on what he presumably sees as the non-teaching role that those external experts can perform?