Meeting of the Parliament 09 February 2012
I thank the cabinet secretary for prior sight of statement and wish him a speedy recovery in restoring his voice to its normal tone.
I want to ask the cabinet secretary about three things. First, he is well aware that some areas of the teaching profession are concerned—whether they are chartered teachers or not—about the fact that chartered teachers do not always have enough time to read up on their subject material given all the other curriculum for excellence and CPD material that they have to get through. How does he envisage the situation improving in the context of the McCormac recommendations?
Secondly, Gerry McCormac is on record as saying that he wants Scotland to look at best practice in other countries, at home and abroad. Apart from looking at the American examples that the cabinet secretary listed, what specific plans are there to make a comprehensive analysis of best practice in other countries?
Thirdly, recommendations 17 and 34 in the McCormac review encourage greater devolution of planning and staffing decisions to headteachers instead of leaving more responsibility with local government. Does the cabinet secretary agree with those recommendations, and if so, why does he feel it appropriate to say, in the context of the section about external experts,
“I am explicitly ruling out the model that is proposed by Renfrewshire Council, or variants of it”?
Irrespective of whether we agree with Renfrewshire Council’s decision, is it the cabinet secretary’s job to make that explicit statement?