Meeting of the Parliament 23 June 2015
No. If the member does not mind, I have some progress to make.
That in turn has proportionality implications that may lead to potential human rights challenges.
The Government has not made the case as to why it has rejected a proportionate approach. Professor Fergus McNeill highlighted the extent of that problem when he pointed out that, under the current fixed period proposals,
“if a person is sentenced to five years, 90 per cent of their custodial sentence would be in prison. However, if a person is sentenced to 10 years, that increases to 95 per cent”.—[Official Report, Justice Committee, 27 May 2015; c 3.]
Furthermore, at present the demand for rehabilitation programmes already outstrips supply, and that demand will almost certainly increase, which will lead to an inevitable challenge under ECHR.
To quote the somewhat damning indictment of key stakeholders, the bill
“will not end automatic early release, it will not reduce reoffending and it will not improve public safety in the longer term; indeed, it is likely to jeopardise both public safety and reintegration.”
In those circumstances, it would be foolhardy to support the bill.
15:44