Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,095,827
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,095,827 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 13 March 2013

13 Mar 2013 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Business Motion

This Parliament should have the opportunity to discuss the reasons why, and to recognise the service that those veterans have given.

Ten years on, Ed Miliband has recognised that the Iraq war was wrong. The debate will provide all members with a chance to reflect—it will perhaps give Johann Lamont the opportunity to admit that she was wrong when she supported the illegal war in Iraq.

I am not surprised that Labour opposes a debate on Trident, on a day when an opinion poll shows that 80 per cent of Scots are against having its replacement on our shores—and only a day after the UK Labour defence spokesperson joined the Conservatives in confirming that his party was in favour of its renewal.

I am not surprised that Labour opposes a debate on Scotland’s financial strength, in a week when it was shown that this country, if we were independent, would be relatively better off than the UK to the tune of £4.4 billion, which is £824 for every man, woman and child in Scotland.

I believe that the people who elected us to represent them expect no less than that the Parliament will debate such issues—issues that affect the lives of those who live here. The Government will continue to do that.

Opposition to such debates represents just three of the many reasons that prove that the Labour Party is scarcely fit for opposition, let alone government. I urge the Parliament to support the business motion.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick) NPA
The next item of business is consideration of business motion S4M-05913, in the name of Joe FitzPatrick, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, setting out a...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Paul Martin has asked to speak against the motion. Mr Martin, you have up to five minutes. 16:51
Paul Martin (Glasgow Provan) (Lab) Lab
I rise on behalf of the Scottish Labour Party to oppose the business motion in the name of Joe FitzPatrick. The motion refers to a Scottish Government debate...
The Minister for Parliamentary Business (Joe FitzPatrick) SNP
I am disappointed, although not surprised, that the Labour Party opposes the business programme for next week. Paul Martin talked about unanswered questions....
The Presiding Officer NPA
We will not have catcalling across the chamber.
Joe FitzPatrick SNP
This Parliament should have the opportunity to discuss the reasons why, and to recognise the service that those veterans have given. Ten years on, Ed Miliba...
John Finnie (Highlands and Islands) (Ind) Ind
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I understand that, under rule 8.11 of standing orders, there can be only one speaker against a business motion. Und...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I thank the member for advance notice of his point of order. The member is correct that standing order 8.11 allows for only one speaker for and one speaker a...
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. For Adam, George (Paisley) (SNP) Adamson, Clare (Central Scotland) (SNP) Allan, Dr Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP) Be...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The result of the division is: For 63, Against 56, Abstentions 1. Motion agreed to, That the Parliament agrees the following programme of business— Tuesda...