Chamber
Meeting of the Parliament 20 November 2013
20 Nov 2013 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
The debate is not easy and it was never going to be. When areas of love meet the law and when belief, commitment and faith collide with legislation, the waters will always be difficult to navigate. I therefore commend all the contributors to the debate in the past months and years who have sought to make thoughtful comments, to elevate the ideas and to temper the language. People have displayed a respect for beliefs that differ from their own and have recognised that those beliefs are just as sincerely held. I hope that that temperance will continue this evening, to demonstrate that, although this may be a fledgling Parliament, it has maturity.
It is precisely because of the nature of the debate that I believe that the bill is a matter of conscience. That is why, like members of other parties, Scottish Conservative members have been given a free vote.
Today, I speak on behalf of only myself. I have no doubt that this could be the most personal speech that I will ever make in the chamber. I hope to explain why I support the broadest principle of the bill—the principle of extending marriage.
I believe in that principle because I believe in marriage. I believe that marriage is a good thing. I saw the evidence of that every day growing up in a house that was full of love. My family had the stresses and strains that are common to all, but there was never any doubt, question or fear in my mind that our togetherness was in any way insecure.
The bedrock of that stability and security was my parents’ marriage. That stability helped me and my sister to flourish and have confidence that we could be whoever we wanted to be. After more than 40 years of marriage, my parents still love each other. I look at what they have and I want that too, and I want it to be recognised in the same way. That recognition matters.
Presiding Officer, from childhood, you have known without even thinking that if you found someone you loved and who loved you in return, you would have the right to marry them. The same unthinking right to marry extends to the cabinet secretary, the Labour Party leader and the Liberal Democrat leader. I want that right to extend to not just me but the thousands of people across Scotland who are told that the law says no and that they cannot marry the love of their life. They are not allowed and, unless we change the law, they will never be allowed.
It does matter. It matters that a whole section of our society is told that they can have the facsimile of civil partnership but they cannot have the real thing. It is not for them. Their love is something different and something less. Their commitment is denied.
I do not want the next generation of young gay people to grow up as I did, believing that marriage is something that they can never have. With this bill, we have the opportunity to change that, and to change the attitudes and stigma that being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender can still evoke, and that can cause so much harm.
It is precisely because of the nature of the debate that I believe that the bill is a matter of conscience. That is why, like members of other parties, Scottish Conservative members have been given a free vote.
Today, I speak on behalf of only myself. I have no doubt that this could be the most personal speech that I will ever make in the chamber. I hope to explain why I support the broadest principle of the bill—the principle of extending marriage.
I believe in that principle because I believe in marriage. I believe that marriage is a good thing. I saw the evidence of that every day growing up in a house that was full of love. My family had the stresses and strains that are common to all, but there was never any doubt, question or fear in my mind that our togetherness was in any way insecure.
The bedrock of that stability and security was my parents’ marriage. That stability helped me and my sister to flourish and have confidence that we could be whoever we wanted to be. After more than 40 years of marriage, my parents still love each other. I look at what they have and I want that too, and I want it to be recognised in the same way. That recognition matters.
Presiding Officer, from childhood, you have known without even thinking that if you found someone you loved and who loved you in return, you would have the right to marry them. The same unthinking right to marry extends to the cabinet secretary, the Labour Party leader and the Liberal Democrat leader. I want that right to extend to not just me but the thousands of people across Scotland who are told that the law says no and that they cannot marry the love of their life. They are not allowed and, unless we change the law, they will never be allowed.
It does matter. It matters that a whole section of our society is told that they can have the facsimile of civil partnership but they cannot have the real thing. It is not for them. Their love is something different and something less. Their commitment is denied.
I do not want the next generation of young gay people to grow up as I did, believing that marriage is something that they can never have. With this bill, we have the opportunity to change that, and to change the attitudes and stigma that being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender can still evoke, and that can cause so much harm.
In the same item of business
The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick)
NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-08327, in the name of Alex Neil, on the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotland) Bill.16:58
The Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing (Alex Neil)
SNP
The Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotland) Bill will make a number of changes to the law on marriage and civil partnership, but the centrepiece is obvious...
Chic Brodie (South Scotland) (SNP)
SNP
What provisions are there in the bill to avoid situations in extremis that may occur when one party challenges the other, which could possibly force action t...
Alex Neil
SNP
I will go into detail on such issues later when I discuss the recommendations from the Equal Opportunities Committee.I have already referred to same-sex marr...
Alex Johnstone (North East Scotland) (Con)
Con
Can the minister clarify at this point exactly how he intends to deal with the issue of the 4,100 consultation submissions that were—through no fault of his—...
Alex Neil
SNP
We have found the submissions and we will put them on the website. As Alex Johnstone said, they were not lost through any fault of the Scottish Government. T...
Richard Lyle (Central Scotland) (SNP)
SNP
As the cabinet secretary knows, my wife and I adopted our daughter some 30 years ago. Would he agree with me that because my wife and I do not support same-s...
Alex Neil
SNP
Believing in or opposing same-sex marriage is in itself no barrier to adoption. I am happy to write to Richard Lyle to clarify the law on adoption in relatio...
Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Con
The cabinet secretary will know that a Roman Catholic adoption agency is currently having its charitable status threatened because it does not recognise same...
Alex Neil
SNP
That matter is currently under legal appeal. Therefore, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on that particular example. I am happy to clarify such ma...
Jamie Hepburn (Cumbernauld and Kilsyth) (SNP)
SNP
At present, the state dictates what the position of each religious denomination should be on the matter: it explicitly does not allow them to marry people of...
Alex Neil
SNP
Absolutely; a number of religious organisations and churches are very much in favour of the proposed legislation—the Quakers being a good example. Until now,...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP)
SNP
Does the cabinet secretary agree with the Queen’s counsel who told the Equal Opportunities Committee that legally the guidance will have no binding effect?
Alex Neil
SNP
I do not agree at all. The guidance is from the chief prosecutor to every prosecutor in Scotland. In my view, to say that it will have no impact is absolute ...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
I remind people in the gallery not to applaud.17:15
Margaret McCulloch (Central Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
I welcome the opportunity to speak on behalf of the Equal Opportunities Committee, following our stage 1 report on the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotla...
Margaret Mitchell (Central Scotland) (Con)
Con
Will Margaret McCulloch give way?
Margaret McCulloch
Lab
No—I do not have time. I have a lot to get through on the report.Some witnesses emphasised the concept of complementarity between men and women. The Catholic...
Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab)
Lab
I am pleased to participate in this stage 1 debate on the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotland) Bill. At the outset, I commend the Scottish Government un...
Mark McDonald (Aberdeen Donside) (SNP)
SNP
Will the member give way?
Jackie Baillie
Lab
I will in a second.Religions can and do refuse to marry people. That is a matter for them; it is not proposed that that will change.
Mark McDonald
SNP
The member has just made my point, which is that churches are already able to choose who they marry.
Jackie Baillie
Lab
I am never keen to give up time to the member, but I am glad that we are in agreement.I welcome that point because it is important. However, I acknowledge th...
Ruth Davidson (Glasgow) (Con)
Con
The debate is not easy and it was never going to be. When areas of love meet the law and when belief, commitment and faith collide with legislation, the wate...
Jamie Hepburn
SNP
I thank Ruth Davidson for giving way during her very eloquent contribution; I am enjoying it very much. She spoke about the next generation. I am the father ...
Ruth Davidson
Con
I would hope that their father would have helped to vote them that opportunity. Talking about the next generation is important because it is those people we ...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
We now move to the open debate. I have 20 members who wish to take part in the debate. I am absolutely determined that those who have already indicated their...
Marco Biagi (Edinburgh Central) (SNP)
SNP
Thank you, Presiding Officer. I apologise for not noticing earlier that we were running slightly ahead of schedule.As is becoming clear to everyone, the bill...
Alison McInnes (North East Scotland) (LD)
LD
Is the member aware that last month marked the 50th anniversary of the publication of a book called “Towards a Quaker View of Sex”? That book said:“Surely it...
Marco Biagi
SNP
I very much agree with the sentiment that was expressed, although I speak up for Unitarians, who have also been performing same-sex blessings since the 1950s...