Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,096,445
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,096,445 contributions in session S6, 13 May 2026 – 12 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 3,975. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 11 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 12 June 2013

12 Jun 2013 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
National Planning Framework 3 and Scottish Planning Policy
Mackay, Derek SNP Renfrewshire North and West Watch on SPTV
We are working on the definition of “wind farm”, but any reasonable person would understand that it means a number of wind turbines in a particular area. The policy in relation to group 1, “Areas where wind farms will not be acceptable”, constitutes an outright ban, for the first time, on wind farms in national parks and national scenic areas. I will be happy to get back to the member on wind turbines. I say again that individual planning applications are determined on their merits.

I welcomed the engagement of the renewables industry, which will continue as we approach 23 July—the end of the 12-week consultation. I am convinced that we can deliver on our renewables targets, providing greater opportunities and greater protection where that is required.

The challenge of climate change compels us to make the transition to a sustainable, growing, low-carbon economy. That is a key focus of our proposals for the third national planning framework. Sarah Boyack’s amendment notes that the climate change target for 2011 was missed, and it suggests that policies and investment are required to cut emissions further. We agree. The Government’s climate change second report on proposals and policies gives details of a package of measures to enable us to achieve our targets. We have already committed more than £1.1 billion over the current spending review period, specifically for action on emissions.

The amendment in Sarah Boyack’s name highlights the importance of the planning system to sustainable development and the importance of sustainable communities in helping to achieve Scotland’s climate change targets. We agree on those matters, too. I am pleased that Sarah Boyack appears to be so closely aligned with the Government, and I am happy to accept the amendment in her name.

I have already touched on what we propose for onshore wind energy through Scottish planning policy, but our ambitions for low-carbon energy infrastructure amount to far more than that. Grid enhancement is essential if we are to make the most of our natural energy resources, and NPF2 identified a suite of electricity grid enhancements as a national development. We propose to retain that in NPF3, updated to take account of current plans, particularly for offshore and international connections.

If we are to reap the maximum economic benefits from the low-carbon revolution, we must ensure that we have the necessary infrastructure and a welcoming environment for the design, manufacture, installation and servicing of renewable energy generation in Scotland. That is why we want to give support to some of our best opportunities to do so—to our low-carbon enterprise areas, sites in the national renewables infrastructure plan, and other clusters of energy-related activity in places such as Aberdeenshire, Ayrshire and the three island authority areas.

As part of our balanced energy mix, we very much want to see carbon capture and storage applied to gas and coal-fired power stations in Scotland. We have a number of projects in Scotland in which, with the right financial support, we can make that happen. The Peterhead carbon capture and storage project is an opportunity to develop the world’s first commercial-scale full chain carbon dioxide capture, transportation and storage project. It has secured preferred bidder status by the United Kingdom Government Department of Energy and Climate Change, and proposals for a new power station with CCS at Grangemouth remain on the reserve list.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (John Scott) Con
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-06933, in the name of Derek Mackay, on progress towards national planning framework 3 and the Scottish pl...
The Minister for Local Government and Planning (Derek Mackay) SNP
This debate is about the Scottish Government’s two key planning policy documents: the national planning framework, which is our long-term spatial plan for th...
Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) Green
It is very clear what the minister wants: he wants growth to be the central purpose of the planning system. However, does the legislation that was passed in ...
Derek Mackay SNP
I am sure that Mr Harvie will be relieved to hear that we have greater protection of the environment at our core at the same time as encouraging sustainable ...
Patrick Harvie Green
I am grateful to the minister for giving way a second time. He said that there will be no wind farms in national parks or scenic landscape. Will he say preci...
Derek Mackay SNP
We are working on the definition of “wind farm”, but any reasonable person would understand that it means a number of wind turbines in a particular area. The...
Alex Johnstone (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
Will the minister clarify what the status of the Peterhead proposal would be should his party’s policy of independence be successful?
Derek Mackay SNP
I am sure that Scotland’s excellent record on energy and on ambitious climate change targets will continue with independence. In fact, I am sure that it will...
Claudia Beamish (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Twenty years ago, I helped to set up Loudon pond community nature reserve in Clydesdale. That was the result of site regeneration, and it is now regarded as ...
Derek Mackay SNP
That is an excellent point, with which I agree. I have been very impressed by work by, for example, the Scottish Wildlife Trust, which I visited in Cumbernau...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab) Lab
I thank the many organisations that have sent us briefings today. I realise that they had a very short time to pull together their key observations, and thei...
Derek Mackay SNP
I have said repeatedly that section 75 benefits should relate to the application and mitigation of a development, and not to the added extras that we know th...
Sarah Boyack Lab
That could mean roads, public transport infrastructure, schools or energy, and we need to be much more specific. For example, because of the lack of investme...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Elaine Smith) Lab
I must ask you to close.
Sarah Boyack Lab
The SPP is about the how and the NPF is about the where, as the RTPI says. I have focused on the purpose of planning and what should be in the purpose as set...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
I should say at the outset that we are quite tight for time in the debate.15:06
Margaret Mitchell (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
I welcome today’s debate on the publication of the main issues report for the third national planning framework and the consultation draft of the Scottish pl...
Mike MacKenzie (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Margaret Mitchell Con
I am pressed for time. I will perhaps give way later.I turn to some major aspects of the NPF3 main issues report. As an MSP for Central Scotland, I am hearte...
Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) Green
I thank Margaret Mitchell for giving me the opportunity to begin by commending the Government for not allowing the suggestion that there will be a reduction ...
Mike MacKenzie SNP
Having listened very carefully to Patrick Harvie’s speech, I am completely unclear about what he means.
Patrick Harvie Green
Well, I am not in government. Mike MacKenzie might be grateful for that, but I hope that one day I will have the chance to disappoint him.Whether the Governm...
Derek Mackay SNP
Surely any reasonable person who reads the priorities in NPF3 will come to the clear conclusion that the transition to a low-carbon economy is a central driv...
Patrick Harvie Green
Climate change is indeed mentioned, but I wonder whether a national planning framework and SPP that focus on sustainable development would have at their hear...
The Deputy Presiding Officer Lab
We move to the open debate. As we are quite tight for time, I must ask for six-minute speeches.15:19
Mike MacKenzie (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) SNP
I am delighted that we have received many briefings for the debate from many interested organisations. After all, one of the problems that the planning syste...
Claudia Beamish Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Mike MacKenzie SNP
I am sorry; the Presiding Officer has told us that we are short of time, so I think that I should move on.The planning system should be the midwife of that w...
Patrick Harvie Green
Can Mr MacKenzie do what no Scottish Government minister has ever done and give a clear, unambiguous definition of what the hell sustainable economic growth ...
Mike MacKenzie SNP
I think that you are deliberately misunderstanding that. It is difficult to say in a few words precisely what the meaning is but, nevertheless, I think that ...