Chamber
Meeting of the Parliament 31 October 2012
31 Oct 2012 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Local Government Finance (Unoccupied Properties etc) (Scotland) Bill
I am pleased to open the stage 3 debate on the Local Government Finance (Unoccupied Properties etc) (Scotland) Bill. I thank the Local Government and Regeneration Committee, in particular, for its scrutiny of the bill throughout its parliamentary stages, and I thank all those organisations and individuals who provided oral and written evidence to the Parliament.
The bill is a key part of our wider work to reduce the number of empty properties, whether homes or non-residential properties, so that we can make best use of existing buildings and minimise the number of properties that fall into disrepair and become a blight on our communities. Long-term empty homes frequently fall into disrepair and can attract vandalism and other forms of crime. They reduce the value of surrounding properties and can affect the perception of a neighbourhood as a good place to live, which, in turn, reduces residents’ quality of life.
At the same time, we are determined to reduce the number of homes that sit empty in the long term—of which we have more than 25,000—while around 140,000 families are on waiting lists for a social rented home. Bringing many of those homes back into use will help, directly or indirectly, to free up more homes for those who really need them.
Giving councils the flexibility to increase council tax charges for certain long-term empty properties will help, encourage or, where needed, push owners not to leave their property lying empty. Councils will also be given the flexibility to target any additional revenue at delivering key local priorities, which will provide a useful additional tool, alongside the other measures that councils can already use. For example, the Scottish Government has been funding the empty homes partnership to provide support to councils in tackling empty homes. In addition, we are part-funding three empty homes officers, who are shared across seven councils, on a pilot basis. Those officers are having considerable success in developing a blueprint for successful empty homes engagement work that could be replicated across Scotland, and we should all support the fact that their interventions have already seen a number of empty homes brought back into use.
We recognise that some owners need financial assistance to bring their homes up to a standard that makes them suitable for letting. That is why we have made £4 million available through the empty homes loan fund.
The fund will make at least 160 empty homes available for affordable housing—more, I hope. I am pleased to say that we have had a good response to our call for bids for the fund. Many of those homes could be made available for intermediate rent, which, in turn, would help to grow a more vibrant private rented sector, providing tenants with a greater choice of good-quality homes.
We have listened to stakeholders—Parliament and others—throughout the development of our proposals for the council tax increase and we have amended our proposals as the policy has been developed through active engagement. Examples of changes include limiting exceptions to the increase to only those who are actively trying to bring their homes back into use—whether they intend to sell or rent them—and bringing forward stage 2 amendments to increase the maximum level of penalty charge. A council can charge an owner if they fail to provide information about whether their home is unoccupied. That charge has been increased from £200 to £500. There is also now a limit in the bill itself, restricting the maximum amount of council tax increase to 100 per cent of the applicable standard rate, rather than placing that restriction in regulations.
We have also recently consulted on our proposals for draft council tax regulations and I thank everyone who gave their views. Responses are currently being analysed and we are considering some changes in the light of the comments that have been made. I recognise some of the administrative challenges that implementing a council tax increase is likely to bring and I am keen to make sure that the new regulations can be enforced to help tackle owners who deliberately leave their property empty. At the same time, I want to leave enough flexibility to avoid penalising those who are genuinely trying to bring their property into use, for example by renting or selling it. I hope to be able to lay a set of revised regulations in December.
The bill will enable us to bring forward regulations to reduce the level of empty property relief for empty commercial properties once they have been empty for more than three months.
The bill is a key part of our wider work to reduce the number of empty properties, whether homes or non-residential properties, so that we can make best use of existing buildings and minimise the number of properties that fall into disrepair and become a blight on our communities. Long-term empty homes frequently fall into disrepair and can attract vandalism and other forms of crime. They reduce the value of surrounding properties and can affect the perception of a neighbourhood as a good place to live, which, in turn, reduces residents’ quality of life.
At the same time, we are determined to reduce the number of homes that sit empty in the long term—of which we have more than 25,000—while around 140,000 families are on waiting lists for a social rented home. Bringing many of those homes back into use will help, directly or indirectly, to free up more homes for those who really need them.
Giving councils the flexibility to increase council tax charges for certain long-term empty properties will help, encourage or, where needed, push owners not to leave their property lying empty. Councils will also be given the flexibility to target any additional revenue at delivering key local priorities, which will provide a useful additional tool, alongside the other measures that councils can already use. For example, the Scottish Government has been funding the empty homes partnership to provide support to councils in tackling empty homes. In addition, we are part-funding three empty homes officers, who are shared across seven councils, on a pilot basis. Those officers are having considerable success in developing a blueprint for successful empty homes engagement work that could be replicated across Scotland, and we should all support the fact that their interventions have already seen a number of empty homes brought back into use.
We recognise that some owners need financial assistance to bring their homes up to a standard that makes them suitable for letting. That is why we have made £4 million available through the empty homes loan fund.
The fund will make at least 160 empty homes available for affordable housing—more, I hope. I am pleased to say that we have had a good response to our call for bids for the fund. Many of those homes could be made available for intermediate rent, which, in turn, would help to grow a more vibrant private rented sector, providing tenants with a greater choice of good-quality homes.
We have listened to stakeholders—Parliament and others—throughout the development of our proposals for the council tax increase and we have amended our proposals as the policy has been developed through active engagement. Examples of changes include limiting exceptions to the increase to only those who are actively trying to bring their homes back into use—whether they intend to sell or rent them—and bringing forward stage 2 amendments to increase the maximum level of penalty charge. A council can charge an owner if they fail to provide information about whether their home is unoccupied. That charge has been increased from £200 to £500. There is also now a limit in the bill itself, restricting the maximum amount of council tax increase to 100 per cent of the applicable standard rate, rather than placing that restriction in regulations.
We have also recently consulted on our proposals for draft council tax regulations and I thank everyone who gave their views. Responses are currently being analysed and we are considering some changes in the light of the comments that have been made. I recognise some of the administrative challenges that implementing a council tax increase is likely to bring and I am keen to make sure that the new regulations can be enforced to help tackle owners who deliberately leave their property empty. At the same time, I want to leave enough flexibility to avoid penalising those who are genuinely trying to bring their property into use, for example by renting or selling it. I hope to be able to lay a set of revised regulations in December.
The bill will enable us to bring forward regulations to reduce the level of empty property relief for empty commercial properties once they have been empty for more than three months.
In the same item of business
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Elaine Smith)
Lab
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-04598, in the name of Derek Mackay, on the Local Government Finance (Unoccupied Properties etc) (Scotland...
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth (John Swinney)
SNP
For the purposes of rule 9.11 of the standing orders, I advise the Parliament that Her Majesty, having been informed of the purport of the Local Government F...
The Deputy Presiding Officer
Lab
Thank you very much, cabinet secretary.We now begin the debate. I call Margaret Burgess to speak to and move the motion in the name of Derek Mackay.16:17
The Minister for Housing and Welfare (Margaret Burgess)
SNP
I am pleased to open the stage 3 debate on the Local Government Finance (Unoccupied Properties etc) (Scotland) Bill. I thank the Local Government and Regener...
Hanzala Malik (Glasgow) (Lab)
Lab
Will the minister consider, under secondary legislation, changing that period of time—for small businesses only—from three months to six months? It is a shor...
Margaret Burgess
SNP
Many of those businesses would be exempt from business rates in any case, but the Minister for Local Government and Planning has said that he will review the...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab)
Lab
I thank those who gave evidence to the committees that dealt with the bill, the organisations that lobbied us, and the committee clerks.From the outset, Labo...
The Minister for Local Government and Planning (Derek Mackay)
SNP
The figures are not true, of course—but even the figure that the Labour Party has conjured up excludes £2.3 billion of non-domestic rates from the local gove...
Sarah Boyack
Lab
The evidence that was presented to the committee and MSPs. There are not only demolitions in the industrial sector; there are demolitions in the commercial s...
Derek Mackay
SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Sarah Boyack
Lab
No. I have answered the minister’s question. He asked about the evidence, and I have told him what it is.We have been told—by town centre managers, I think—t...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP)
SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Sarah Boyack
Lab
No. I want to get on and address the minister’s other point about estimates.Glasgow City Council estimates that, on its own, it will take more than £1 millio...
Derek Mackay
SNP
Sorry. Can the member say that again?
Sarah Boyack
Lab
I will repeat it for the minister’s benefit. The information that was submitted to me by Glasgow City Council is that it alone will have to pay more than £1 ...
Derek Mackay
SNP
I am happy that the member will take my intervention. Perhaps she would like to have another go at citing exactly which evidence she was talking about when s...
Sarah Boyack
Lab
I gave the minister the source: I said that it related to town centre managers. I am sure that that was the reference that we got. I will certainly check the...
Margaret Mitchell (Central Scotland) (Con)
Con
I cannot pretend that it gives me any pleasure to speak in this stage 3 debate on the Local Government Finance (Unoccupied Properties etc) (Scotland) Bill, w...
Derek Mackay
SNP
In light of what the member has just said, does she have a view on the United Kingdom Government’s intervention on listed properties, which will be exempt fr...
Margaret Mitchell
Con
The UK Government proposals that the minister is talking about are not part of the bill; they are not relevant. What the UK Government is doing is looking at...
The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick)
NPA
We now move to the open debate. I remind members that speeches are four minutes. If everybody keeps to their four minutes, it will ensure that everyone who h...
John Wilson (Central Scotland) (SNP)
SNP
I come to this debate as a relatively new member of the Local Government and Regeneration Committee. I was not a member of the committee when the Local Gover...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
You need to start to bring your remarks to a close.
John Wilson
SNP
Thank you, Presiding Officer. In many ways, the traditional town centre has been losing out as a result of wider societal change, and the challenge is for it...
Anne McTaggart (Glasgow) (Lab)
Lab
I want to express my concerns on the challenging process and the questionable content of the bill.As a member of the Local Government and Regeneration Commit...
George Adam (Paisley) (SNP)
SNP
I am extremely pleased to speak in this debate. I do so not in a cold or academic way, because the town that I represent, and in which I was born, has alread...
Jim Hume (South Scotland) (LD)
LD
The member mentioned that he consulted two children. Did he actually consult any businesses in Paisley regarding empty properties?
George Adam
SNP
Ironically, anyone who had listened earlier would know that our problem in Paisley is trying to retain people because of previous Administrations in Westmins...
Derek Mackay
SNP
Does the member welcome the fact that we consulted businesses on this issue, including the business improvement district steering group, which supports our d...
George Adam
SNP
Yes.We have talked about Mr Hume’s contributions to the debate. We must remember that some organisations take a purely business perspective and do not consid...