Chamber
Meeting of the Parliament 27 October 2011
27 Oct 2011 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Raising Attainment and Ambition (Young People)
I am delighted to open this morning’s debate. Apart from allowing me to outline the Government’s ambitions for all of our children and young people, it also gives me the opportunity to share a debate with Alasdair Allan for the first time in 20 years. I suppose that it is also the first time that the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning has let the two junior education ministers out to play.
The two core and inextricably linked aims of the education team in this term of government are to raise attainment and improve the life chances of Scotland’s children. At the heart of everything we do and of all our aspirations for our children is to ensure that we have happy healthy bairns who reach their full potential. The guiding principle for us all as parliamentarians in making decisions and expressing views should be that if something is not good enough for our own sons and daughters, it is not good enough for any child or young person growing up in Scotland. Educational attainment is the passport to social, cultural and economic prosperity and we are absolutely focused on the child’s needs throughout their learning journey from the early years to young adulthood.
I point out from the outset that in seeking to raise educational attainment we do not have a doom-and-gloom agenda. We have strengths and successes to build on. That said, I reassure the chamber that there is no room for complacency and when it comes to improving the life chances of our looked-after children I will not beat about the bush: the report card for all corporate parents at all levels of local and national Government says, “Can and must do better.” We also need to focus attention on reducing the gap between the lowest and highest attainers in education.
Although we can celebrate the fact that our education system performs well internationally; that we have excellence in higher education; that our 15-year-olds perform above the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development average for reading and science; that we have record levels of young people in further and higher education; that statistics and qualifications show that our young people are performing better than at any point in the past; and that—this is for Mr Macintosh, in particular—class sizes are at a record low, I reassert that there is still a job of work to do. That is why, among other things, the cabinet secretary Michael Russell has brought together a small group of headteachers with an excellent personal track record of raising attainment in their own schools across a range of circumstances. The group’s members will distil from their own real-life work experience what works to help our young citizens to be high attainers. It is crucial that we understand and share innovative practice and the group’s work will be concluded speedily.
I will also discuss the specific issue of looked-after children with the attainment group. Although I know that next week there will be a debate on permanence planning for looked-after children and that the Education and Culture Committee is holding a very welcome inquiry into the issue, I flag up to Parliament the learning hub. That is a strand of work that is being undertaken by the looked-after children strategic implementation group, which will oversee a variety of activities to boost and drive improvements in educational attainment.
Over and above our specific measures on attainment, how will we achieve systematic and radical change for our children, our country and our communities? For me, the starting point is the early years—the foundation years. When it comes to babies and very young children, including pre-birth, we will reap what we sow. If we are serious about giving our children the best start in life, we need to be serious about the fundamental shift both in philosophy and of resources into the early years, early intervention and preventative spend.
Apart from independence, preventative spend is the most radical and exciting agenda that the Government is pursuing. It cuts across all arms of Government, both local and national, and across universal and targeted services. This Scottish National Party Government has been brave and bold enough to grasp the agenda, despite the financial constraints that we are all living with.
I am currently finalising arrangements with local government and health partners in establishing the early years task force that will oversee a joint change fund of more than £270 million. That will be used to transform the lives of children and communities and to begin to unlock the potential of our universal services, whether in education or health, in prevention as opposed to cure, implementing that transformational change at a local level as envisaged by the early years framework.
Our wider programme of reform, including our legislative ambitions, is central to improving attainment. In essence, our future children’s services bill is about how to get all agencies to work together better in making smarter and quicker decisions for all our children.
I was struck by recent comments by Professor Buchanan, director of the centre for research into parenting and children at the University of Oxford, when she said that the job of universal services is to grow brains. I could not agree more. GIRFEC—getting it right for every child—and attainment go hand in hand, and improving attainment cannot be divorced from ensuring that children are safe, loved, happy, healthy, included and nurtured, have opportunities to play and are valued and respected.
There is a strong synergy between GIRFEC, the curriculum for excellence and the personalisation of services.
The two core and inextricably linked aims of the education team in this term of government are to raise attainment and improve the life chances of Scotland’s children. At the heart of everything we do and of all our aspirations for our children is to ensure that we have happy healthy bairns who reach their full potential. The guiding principle for us all as parliamentarians in making decisions and expressing views should be that if something is not good enough for our own sons and daughters, it is not good enough for any child or young person growing up in Scotland. Educational attainment is the passport to social, cultural and economic prosperity and we are absolutely focused on the child’s needs throughout their learning journey from the early years to young adulthood.
I point out from the outset that in seeking to raise educational attainment we do not have a doom-and-gloom agenda. We have strengths and successes to build on. That said, I reassure the chamber that there is no room for complacency and when it comes to improving the life chances of our looked-after children I will not beat about the bush: the report card for all corporate parents at all levels of local and national Government says, “Can and must do better.” We also need to focus attention on reducing the gap between the lowest and highest attainers in education.
Although we can celebrate the fact that our education system performs well internationally; that we have excellence in higher education; that our 15-year-olds perform above the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development average for reading and science; that we have record levels of young people in further and higher education; that statistics and qualifications show that our young people are performing better than at any point in the past; and that—this is for Mr Macintosh, in particular—class sizes are at a record low, I reassert that there is still a job of work to do. That is why, among other things, the cabinet secretary Michael Russell has brought together a small group of headteachers with an excellent personal track record of raising attainment in their own schools across a range of circumstances. The group’s members will distil from their own real-life work experience what works to help our young citizens to be high attainers. It is crucial that we understand and share innovative practice and the group’s work will be concluded speedily.
I will also discuss the specific issue of looked-after children with the attainment group. Although I know that next week there will be a debate on permanence planning for looked-after children and that the Education and Culture Committee is holding a very welcome inquiry into the issue, I flag up to Parliament the learning hub. That is a strand of work that is being undertaken by the looked-after children strategic implementation group, which will oversee a variety of activities to boost and drive improvements in educational attainment.
Over and above our specific measures on attainment, how will we achieve systematic and radical change for our children, our country and our communities? For me, the starting point is the early years—the foundation years. When it comes to babies and very young children, including pre-birth, we will reap what we sow. If we are serious about giving our children the best start in life, we need to be serious about the fundamental shift both in philosophy and of resources into the early years, early intervention and preventative spend.
Apart from independence, preventative spend is the most radical and exciting agenda that the Government is pursuing. It cuts across all arms of Government, both local and national, and across universal and targeted services. This Scottish National Party Government has been brave and bold enough to grasp the agenda, despite the financial constraints that we are all living with.
I am currently finalising arrangements with local government and health partners in establishing the early years task force that will oversee a joint change fund of more than £270 million. That will be used to transform the lives of children and communities and to begin to unlock the potential of our universal services, whether in education or health, in prevention as opposed to cure, implementing that transformational change at a local level as envisaged by the early years framework.
Our wider programme of reform, including our legislative ambitions, is central to improving attainment. In essence, our future children’s services bill is about how to get all agencies to work together better in making smarter and quicker decisions for all our children.
I was struck by recent comments by Professor Buchanan, director of the centre for research into parenting and children at the University of Oxford, when she said that the job of universal services is to grow brains. I could not agree more. GIRFEC—getting it right for every child—and attainment go hand in hand, and improving attainment cannot be divorced from ensuring that children are safe, loved, happy, healthy, included and nurtured, have opportunities to play and are valued and respected.
There is a strong synergy between GIRFEC, the curriculum for excellence and the personalisation of services.
In the same item of business
The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick)
NPA
Good morning. I remind members to switch off all mobile phones and electronic devices.The first item of business is a debate on motion S4M-01134, in the name...
The Minister for Children and Young People (Angela Constance)
SNP
I am delighted to open this morning’s debate. Apart from allowing me to outline the Government’s ambitions for all of our children and young people, it also ...
Liam McArthur (Orkney Islands) (LD)
LD
The minister will be well aware that there is cross-party support for what is set out in GIRFEC. She may also be aware that the Education and Culture Committ...
Angela Constance
SNP
Liam McArthur is right that, despite the fact that Scotland is a small country, the implementation of the early years framework and GIRFEC is uneven. That is...
Ken Macintosh (Eastwood) (Lab)
Lab
I cannot disagree with the intent behind the minister’s words, but I question the actions that are being taken and the implementation. With regard to post-16...
Angela Constance
SNP
As Mr Macintosh well knows, this Government, through its work with the Scottish Further and Higher Education Funding Council, will ensure that the £2 billion...
Ken Macintosh
Lab
In the middle of that answer, the minister said that the Government is still committed to maintaining student numbers. Could she further clarify that point? ...
Angela Constance
SNP
We are meeting our commitments and we will be doing the best by children and young people, starting in the early years and going right through to post-16 edu...
Ken Macintosh (Eastwood) (Lab)
Lab
I am pleased to have the opportunity to debate attainment and the achievements of our young people. This is the first chance in the current session of Parlia...
Angela Constance
SNP
I remind Mr Macintosh that this Government has invested £4 million in activity agreements that have reached out to children who are furthest away from educat...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
Mr Macintosh, you can be assured that, following that very lengthy intervention, you will get additional time.
Ken Macintosh
Lab
Thank you very much.My argument was not that the Government is in hock to vested interests; it was that it is taking a rather elitist approach to education. ...
Angela Constance
SNP
What is elitist about our leadership on and investment in the early years? We are the first Government to really grasp the nettle of preventative spend, whic...
Ken Macintosh
Lab
If the Government were committed to early years intervention, we would be with it entirely, but the trouble is that the talk is there, but the £50 million ch...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
Can we hear the member, please?
Ken Macintosh
Lab
Glasgow City Council, which has been trying for years to invest in nurture groups, is continually criticised by the Government for the work that it does. Int...
The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning (Michael Russell)
SNP
Will the member give way?
The Presiding Officer
NPA
The member is over his time.
Ken Macintosh
Lab
The basic EMA is still there, but all the additional money to retain people has gone.Schools of ambition have gone, colleges’ funding has been cut, EMAs have...
Liz Smith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con)
Con
I will refocus attention on the subject of the debate. I do not think that there is a more important subject for debate than how we should raise attainment f...
Claudia Beamish (South Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
As a former teacher, I find Liz Smith’s arguments about the inability of the present management structure to connect well with curriculum for excellence extr...
Liz Smith
Con
David Cameron put the argument across strongly when the Education and Culture Committee took evidence. The curriculum for excellence allows individual school...
Paul Wheelhouse (South Scotland) (SNP)
SNP
Although members around the chamber might disagree about the means by which to achieve this, we as parliamentarians are all motivated by our strong desire to...
Ken Macintosh
Lab
Does Mr Wheelhouse simply judge the success or failure of Scottish policies on whether they are better than English policies?
Paul Wheelhouse
SNP
No, indeed not. This debate has been characterised by reference to Scottish Government cuts and people need to recognise that, within a tight financial settl...
Jenny Marra (North East Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
A report that was published in the Sunday Herald last weekend, which has been referred to many times already in the debate, showed just how clear the link be...
George Adam (Paisley) (SNP)
SNP
First, I apologise for my voice; I have man flu. As all the women in the chamber know, men have difficulty with dealing with a slight cold.When I came to the...
Ken Macintosh
Lab
Is Mr Adam guaranteeing that, when a child enters a class of 18 in primary 1, he will stay in a class of 18 throughout his school career?
George Adam
SNP
I was talking about your idea that there would be constant change throughout a child’s primary school education. That simply will not happen in any school.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Elaine Smith)
Lab
Mr Adam, would you address your remarks through the chair, please? Thank you very much.