Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 07 December 2011

07 Dec 2011 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Parliamentary Bureau Motions
I will not take that long.

Scotland has committed itself to ambitious climate targets, with 80 per cent emission reductions by 2050. The Greens believe that our targets should be met as a result of our efforts in Scotland, through important actions such as widespread energy efficiency schemes and the promotion of walking and cycling. However, the order enables us to buy in carbon credits that represent promised carbon reductions in other countries, which is something that we consistently opposed during the passage of the Climate Change (Scotland) Bill. The Government says that it does not intend to use those powers. We welcome that commitment but, in that case, why lay the order?

If we end up spending money on buying the credits that the order allows us to, it will make our carbon accounts look good but will not provide for the people of Scotland the many other social, environmental and economic benefits that low-carbon investment can bring. For example, investment in cycling would improve people’s health through physical activity and reduced air pollution.

Some argue that carbon credits can support developing countries and that we have a moral obligation to support others to take a low-carbon development path. That support should be provided not through carbon credits, but grants to support community-level projects, and the Government has promised to explore that through a climate adaptation fund. We look forward to seeing its proposals on that.

For those reasons, we oppose the order.

17:44

In the same item of business