Chamber
Meeting of the Parliament 18 November 2010
18 Nov 2010 · S3 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Alternative Vote Referendum Date
This is our first debate on electoral matters since I took portfolio responsibility for elections. It comes at a time when we are a mere six months away from the next elections to the Scottish Parliament. As always, the elections next May—the fourth since devolution—will be keenly contested. I know that I am not alone in hoping that the election and the debate that precedes it will capture the imagination of Scottish voters and that they will turn out in large numbers.
The elections will be important to the people of Scotland, for voting is the single most important action that citizens can take to ensure that their voices are heard, and the elections next May will give the Scottish public the opportunity to do just that. By voting for their preferred candidate or party, the Scottish people will choose the members who will sit in the Parliament and make decisions that affect them and their families every day. That is one of the direct benefits of the devolution that most of us fought and argued for, and it is a benefit that we must look to build upon.
As the current generation of politicians, we are all working for a high turnout next May, but a high turnout is not an end in itself. As well as encouraging and motivating large numbers of people to vote, we should also be looking to ensure that those who vote are able to do so on an informed basis. That is what is at issue in today’s debate. In addition, and in support of that objective, it is important for democracy in Scotland that the elections to the Scottish Parliament are given the space and prominence that are required for the public to make their decisions. As things stand, however, that will not happen next year. As part of its first legislative programme, the United Kingdom Government has introduced legislation that will mean that the next Scottish Parliament election will not be given the space or prominence that it deserves.
As members know, the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill provides for a referendum on voting reform for future elections to the Westminster Parliament. Today’s motion and debate are not about the merits or otherwise of the alternative vote system. The problem is one of timing. The UK Government plans to hold the referendum on 5 May 2011, which is the same day as elections to the Scottish Parliament and the other devolved legislatures in Wales and Northern Ireland. Whether that was intended or not, the consequences are that elections to the Scottish Parliament will have to share election day and the preceding campaign period with a UK-wide electoral contest. That cannot be a good thing for democracy in Scotland.
The elections will be important to the people of Scotland, for voting is the single most important action that citizens can take to ensure that their voices are heard, and the elections next May will give the Scottish public the opportunity to do just that. By voting for their preferred candidate or party, the Scottish people will choose the members who will sit in the Parliament and make decisions that affect them and their families every day. That is one of the direct benefits of the devolution that most of us fought and argued for, and it is a benefit that we must look to build upon.
As the current generation of politicians, we are all working for a high turnout next May, but a high turnout is not an end in itself. As well as encouraging and motivating large numbers of people to vote, we should also be looking to ensure that those who vote are able to do so on an informed basis. That is what is at issue in today’s debate. In addition, and in support of that objective, it is important for democracy in Scotland that the elections to the Scottish Parliament are given the space and prominence that are required for the public to make their decisions. As things stand, however, that will not happen next year. As part of its first legislative programme, the United Kingdom Government has introduced legislation that will mean that the next Scottish Parliament election will not be given the space or prominence that it deserves.
As members know, the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill provides for a referendum on voting reform for future elections to the Westminster Parliament. Today’s motion and debate are not about the merits or otherwise of the alternative vote system. The problem is one of timing. The UK Government plans to hold the referendum on 5 May 2011, which is the same day as elections to the Scottish Parliament and the other devolved legislatures in Wales and Northern Ireland. Whether that was intended or not, the consequences are that elections to the Scottish Parliament will have to share election day and the preceding campaign period with a UK-wide electoral contest. That cannot be a good thing for democracy in Scotland.
In the same item of business
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Alasdair Morgan)
SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S3M-7427, in the name of Jim Mather, on the alternative vote referendum and 2011 Scottish Parliament election...
The Minister for Enterprise, Energy and Tourism (Jim Mather)
SNP
This is our first debate on electoral matters since I took portfolio responsibility for elections. It comes at a time when we are a mere six months away from...
Robert Brown (Glasgow) (LD)
LD
Does the minister regard the American system, in which people vote for Presidents, members of Congress and everything down to dog-catchers on the same day, a...
Jim Mather
SNP
There was a time when the American electoral system might have been held up as a good example here, but I am afraid that those days have gone.There is preced...
David McLetchie (Edinburgh Pentlands) (Con)
Con
In an ideal world, there would of course be no coincidence in the dates for holding elections to our Parliaments or councils or for the conduct of referenda....
Jim Mather
SNP
Is the member saying that an ideal world would mean no clash of dates?
David McLetchie
Con
I said that, in an ideal world, it would be possible to timetable different dates. However, I also pointed out that this is not an ideal or perfect world, an...
Margaret Curran (Glasgow Baillieston) (Lab)
Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
David McLetchie
Con
No. I want to make some progress.Let us be clear that it was always possible to have dates that coincided, even when not by deliberate design: on many occasi...
Brian Adam (Aberdeen North) (SNP)
SNP
Will the member give way?
David McLetchie
Con
No, thank you.I know that £17 million is small beer in the grand scheme of the gargantuan debts and deficits that were left behind by the Labour Government b...
Maureen Watt (North East Scotland) (SNP)
SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
David McLetchie
Con
No—I am in my last minute.
The Deputy Presiding Officer
SNP
The member has time if he wishes.
David McLetchie
Con
Do I? Thank you very much, Presiding Officer. By all means, then, I will take an intervention.
Maureen Watt
SNP
Will the member acknowledge that the Electoral Commission said:“The rules on how the referendum will be conducted must be clear from at least six months in a...
David McLetchie
Con
The member might want to get picky about a few dates here and there, but I do not really think that it will be too difficult, even for an SNP brain, to work ...
Mike Rumbles (West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) (LD)
LD
The Scottish Liberal Democrats support the decision to hold a fairer vote referendum on the same day as the Scottish parliamentary elections. Holding the two...
Jim Mather
SNP
Will the member take an intervention?Margaret Curran rose—
Mike Rumbles
LD
I ask members to let me get started—we do not normally intervene in the first minute of a speech.I hope that everyone in the chamber will think that saving t...
Margaret Curran
Lab
Will the member give way?
Mike Rumbles
LD
Oh, go on.
Margaret Curran
Lab
I am so grateful to the member for taking my intervention.On the respect agenda, if the member’s arguments are so strong, surely he agrees that it was incumb...
Mike Rumbles
LD
I think that the so-called respect agenda is interesting and I will address it in more detail in just a minute.Despite the misgivings of both the SNP and the...
Brian Adam
SNP
Will the member give way?
Mike Rumbles
LD
I have already given way.
Brian Adam
SNP
Once.
Mike Rumbles
LD
I give way to Brian Adam.
Brian Adam
SNP
I am grateful to the member for giving way a second time.Does the member agree that it is not just casting the votes on the day that is important, but the de...
Mike Rumbles
LD
Are Brian Adam and his SNP colleagues really so lacking in confidence in their ability to articulate their views to the Scottish people? That is about the re...