Committee
Health and Sport Committee 22 September 2010
22 Sep 2010 · S3 · Health and Sport Committee
Item of business
Alcohol etc (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
As we know, the result of the vote is more or less preordained, so members will be relieved to hear that I do not intend to add greatly to the logorrhoea to which we have already been exposed on the subject.It is a bit rich of Richard Simpson to say that the Government has not listened to the evidence when his party dismissed the concept of minimum unit pricing on the day that the bill was published, before the committee had officially heard one shred of evidence. Those who complain loudly and volubly about weather forecasting would not go out in a small boat without having heard the shipping forecast, or get on board an aircraft with a captain who had ignored the Met Office report. Forecasting is well accepted—indeed, it has been accepted by members of Opposition parties, who have taken elements of the Sheffield report to boost their case but ignored other elements because those are weather forecasts. That is illogical.Almost all members have agreed that price has a part to play in dealing with the alcohol problem, and I believe that minimum unit pricing is the only pricing mechanism that has been suggested that has a chance of working. We heard about alternative methods last week when we took evidence from Labour’s commission. It suggested a pricing mechanism of cost plus alcohol tax plus VAT, but there would be many drawbacks to that. The commission itself accepted that there was absolutely no evidence for it, and that it had no idea how the cost of manufacture would be established or what tax changes would be required to produce a beneficial effect.If we rely on action by another Government, it will not necessarily agree with what this Government asks, and the problem in Scotland is much greater than it is in England. The Labour commission also accepted that if that system was implemented, it would succeed in raising the price of alcohol and put money into the pockets of retailers.Minimum unit pricing has peer-reviewed modelling evidence behind it—which has been accepted by Labour in other situations—and it has the support of health organisations, health boards and the police. We heard that evidence in committee; I am not just talking about private briefings or letters that I have received. Week after week, we heard evidence from royal colleges, health boards, health groups of all sorts and the police, and they were all in favour of minimum unit pricing.Every single director of public health in every single territorial health board in Scotland has supported minimum unit pricing. Those people are not members of the Scottish National Party—the Royal College of Physicians is not an SNP coterie, and nor is the Royal College of Psychiatrists. They are independent scientific people who have looked at the evidence, such as there is, and come to that conclusion. Today, we are going to turn down all of that on the grounds of a few submissions that have come mainly from alcohol manufacturers, supermarkets and retailers.As for the effect on poor people, we heard from Anne Ludbrook that 67 per cent of people in the lower deciles do not drink at all, and therefore her evidence about what drinkers consume relates to only 33 per cent. We heard evidence that the vast majority of people in the lower deciles who drink at all drink very little, so Richard Simpson’s example of the people who drink a bottle of vodka a week relates to a tiny minority.Those who successfully vote against minimum unit pricing—which looks as if it will happen today—having heard all the evidence and tested witnesses will have to live with their consciences as the effect of alcohol does its work, blighting the lives of thousands of Scots and causing unnecessary deaths.
In the same item of business
The Convener (Christine Grahame)
SNP
Good morning and welcome to the 26th meeting in 2010 of the Health and Sport Committee. I remind everyone to switch off mobile phones and other electronic eq...
The Convener
SNP
Amendment 2, in the name of the cabinet secretary, is grouped with amendments 3 to 5, 1, 6 and 7.
The Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing (Nicola Sturgeon)
SNP
I apologise in advance for my relatively lengthy opening remarks as I attempt to address all the amendments in the group.Amendments 3 and 5 are technical ame...
Mary Scanlon (Highlands and Islands) (Con)
Con
Since the Scottish National Party came to power as a minority Government, we have faced many difficult decisions, but no one could accuse the Scottish Conser...
Dr Richard Simpson (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab)
Lab
I started the process by acknowledging, along with all other members, that Scotland had a serious problem with alcohol—a problem that was growing. The Labour...
The Convener
SNP
I have no wish to suppress submissions from members. However, where members agree with something that another member has just said, it would be helpful if th...
Helen Eadie (Dunfermline East) (Lab)
Lab
I support everything that Richard Simpson and Mary Scanlon have said in connection with amendment 1. As we have heard, both the cabinet secretary and the com...
Ross Finnie (West of Scotland) (LD)
LD
I will not vote in favour of the Government’s minimum price policy; I will vote for Mary Scanlon’s amendment. I will do that because I am not persuaded by th...
Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Lab
I have some short comments to make. I will not rehearse all the arguments that other people have made.It is clear that there is a dispute in the committee ab...
Ian McKee (Lothians) (SNP)
SNP
As we know, the result of the vote is more or less preordained, so members will be relieved to hear that I do not intend to add greatly to the logorrhoea to ...
Michael Matheson (Falkirk West) (SNP)
SNP
I believe that the minimum unit pricing proposal in the bill is a serious attempt to implement an effective measure to tackle Scotland’s relationship with al...
The Convener
SNP
Unusually, I will say something from the chair. The cabinet secretary might recall that, many moons ago, when I was in a shadow cabinet, I was completely opp...
Nicola Sturgeon
SNP
I am grateful to all members for their contributions to the debate today. Unsurprisingly, I do not agree with all of them; nevertheless, the debate has been ...
The Convener
SNP
I thank the cabinet secretary and members of the committee for conducting a testy debate in a dignified manner, if I am allowed to use the word “dignified”.T...
The Convener
SNP
There will be a division.ForGrahame, Christine (South of Scotland) (SNP)Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)McKee, Ian (Lothians) (SNP)AgainstEadie, Helen ...
The Convener
SNP
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 3, Abstentions 2. I exercise my casting vote in favour of the amendment.Amendment 2 agreed to.Amendment 3 moved...
The Convener
SNP
The question is, that amendment 3 be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
The Convener
SNP
There will be a division.ForGrahame, Christine (South of Scotland) (SNP)Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)McKee, Ian (Lothians) (SNP)AgainstEadie, Helen ...
The Convener
SNP
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 3, Abstentions 2. I exercise my casting vote in favour of the amendment.Amendment 3 agreed to.Amendment 4 moved...
The Convener
SNP
The question is, that amendment 4 be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
The Convener
SNP
There will be a division.ForGrahame, Christine (South of Scotland) (SNP)Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)McKee, Ian (Lothians) (SNP)AgainstEadie, Helen ...
The Convener
SNP
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 3, Abstentions 2. I exercise my casting vote in favour of the amendment.Amendment 4 agreed to.Amendment 5 moved...
The Convener
SNP
The question is, that amendment 5 be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
The Convener
SNP
There will be a division.ForGrahame, Christine (South of Scotland) (SNP)Matheson, Michael (Falkirk West) (SNP)McKee, Ian (Lothians) (SNP)AgainstEadie, Helen ...
The Convener
SNP
The result of the division is: For 3, Against 3, Abstentions 2. I exercise my casting vote in favour of the amendment.Amendment 5 agreed to.Amendment 1 moved...
The Convener
SNP
The question is, that amendment 1 be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
The Convener
SNP
There will be a division.ForEadie, Helen (Dunfermline East) (Lab)Finnie, Ross (West of Scotland) (LD)Grant, Rhoda (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)Scanlon, Mary ...
The Convener
SNP
The result of the division is: For 5, Against 3, Abstentions 0.Amendment 1 agreed to.After section 1Amendments 6 and 7 not moved.
The Convener
SNP
This is a suitable time for the committee and the cabinet secretary to have a short break.10:53 Meeting suspended. 11:03 On resuming— Section 2—Minimum pri...
The Convener
SNP
Amendment 33, in the name of Mary Scanlon, is the only amendment in the group.