Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 60 of 2,355,091 contributions. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Chamber
22 Mar 2007
Education
I thank Margaret Smith and Hugh Henry very much for their kind words.I support the teaching of history in schools, although not for the reason that Margaret Smith suggested—all families have a few skeletons rattling around in their cupboards. Laughter. The curriculum should be...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Chamber
22 Mar 2007
Education
I will take a brief intervention, but I have quite a lot to say.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Chamber
22 Mar 2007
Education
There have been substantial improvements to Scottish education since before that time. Those improvements have been steady and we must learn from them. However, not everything is perfect. Too much paperwork is thrust on teachers, and anything that the minister can do to lessen...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Chamber
22 Mar 2007
Education
Like Fiona Hyslop, we all believe strongly in the pursuit of educational excellence. I thank her for her kind words about the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. It was a great joy to take that legislation through Parliament, even though I was strongly reprimanded by the Speaker for...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
21 Mar 2007
Annual Report
If I may say so, thanks are due to the convener for his impeccable impartiality and decisiveness in ensuring that we dealt with matters well and efficiently throughout the session.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
21 Mar 2007
Subordinate Legislation
Our opposition to the abolition of school boards is well known. I will not oppose the regulations, as they give guidance on the recent Scottish Schools (Parental Involvement) Act 2006, but parent power is being restricted compared with the school boards system.I have one techn...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Committee
21 Mar 2007
Petition
I agree with the convener. It is for head teachers to decide whether their school should have lockers and how they should be managed. Obviously, that can be done in consultation with parents and pupils. Parental involvement is invaluable and should be strengthened.The pupils w...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Chamber
14 Mar 2007
Edinburgh Airport Rail Link Bill: Final Stage
Does the member accept that if Scotland's capital is a great deal less competitive in communications than other European capitals, that will be to Scotland's disadvantage?
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Chamber
08 Mar 2007
Fairtrade
I congratulate Christine May on securing this important debate. I also congratulate everyone who is involved in Fairtrade fortnight. These are exciting times for the fair trade movement, which has developed from a small movement a few years ago to a major player in Scottish re...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Chamber
08 Mar 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
I welcome everything Adam Ingram said and I thank both ministers for their sensitive handling of what has been, if I may say so, a difficult bill. I also thank the clerks and the members of the Education Committee.It is the inescapable duty of us all to go that extra mile to p...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Chamber
08 Mar 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
I mention that I am a non-practising Queen's counsel, but I am unlikely to have a direct interest in amendment 38. Amendment 38 comes from the Law Society of Scotland, which questions whether the Parliament agrees to the inclusion in the meaning of "regulated work" the work th...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Chamber
08 Mar 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
The minister's initiative in response to requests from me at stage 2 is very welcome. Amendment 17 will provide for monitoring of the implementation of a scheme that, frankly, still has some uncertainties attached to it. If it emerges that there is dissatisfaction or disconten...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Chamber
08 Mar 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
These matters will, after consultation, come up in regulations in the next session of Parliament. In view of what has been said, I will not press amendment 36. However, on account of the significance of the secondary legislation that will come in due course, I see the issue of...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Chamber
08 Mar 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
Is the minister aware that when his party and the Labour Party were in Opposition, they called for the affirmative resolution procedure in similar circumstances on many occasions?
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Chamber
08 Mar 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
Amendment 36 seeks to relieve the understandable concerns of the voluntary sector about the costs of the new scheme. Those concerns have been ably channelled through the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations.The SCVO has asked for amendment 36, which would secure in sta...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Chamber
08 Mar 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
I agree with everything that Fiona Hyslop said. I believe that the minister has done the Parliament, voluntary bodies and charities a service by ensuring that affected bodies are consulted on the timescale for introducing retrospective checking and the fundamental character of...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
27 Feb 2007
Petitions
What guidance do standing orders give us on the issue? What are the options before the committee under standing orders?
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
27 Feb 2007
Petitions
I cannot but have considerable sympathy for what Richard Baker has just said in this connection. The subject should form part of our legacy paper. In the meantime, it can be covered in the various manifestos that will be produced for the election, and thus become a subject for...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Committee
27 Feb 2007
Petitions
It is valuable for us to have this information. If some schools remain without lockers, what advice should pupils be given to avoid back strain? What would be the best way of delivering such guidance?
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
The matter can be followed up in discussions with the minister. If necessary, and if there is no meeting of minds, we can lodge a further amendment at stage 3. I hope that, with a little bit of good faith on both sides, we will be able to get some appropriate wording.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
The minister has given his own commitment. Obviously, he cannot bind a future minister, but if that simple commitment went into the bill I would be satisfied. I genuinely think that, with a bill of such importance, voluntary organisations will need some reassurance on this poi...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I most certainly accept the minister's good faith, but if I may say so he has put the wrong point to the committee. He has already admitted that it is important to have a review, but he cannot bind future ministers. One Administration cannot bind the succeeding one. At this st...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Amendment 264 was prompted by the central registered body in Scotland, which is the clearing house and advisory body for all vetting checks for volunteers. Even under the current system, the CRBS is the biggest client for checks by quite a margin; it is responsible for more th...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Amendment 10 would remove the overlap whereby a 16 or 17-year-old could be classified as both a child and a protected adult. Despite the Executive's assurance that such overlap would just necessitate ticking two boxes on an application form instead of one, it could cause confu...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
In view of the minister's reassurance, I will consult the WRVS and, if it feels that a further adjustment is necessary, I may return to the matter at stage 3. On the other hand, the WRVS may feel that the minister's officials have brought forward perfect work. In that case, it...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I hope that the minister's amendments will do what I sought to do through amendment 15, which I lodged on behalf of the WRVS. It carries out a number of activities in the public interest, including the provision of meals on wheels.As section 94 is currently worded, it defines ...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I do not want to take up the committee's time on the point at this stage. However, if there are particular problems that the Law Society has encountered in the area, I will provide the minister with more detail on the definition in writing. As I said, amendment 260 is primaril...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I can sum up the amendment briefly. It is a probing amendment that seeks to establish whether "psychological harm" has been properly defined. The Law Society of Scotland is concerned that section 93 has not been appropriately worded. In its view, "harm" has not been properly d...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
The minister has kindly offered more detailed discussions on the matter. I would be grateful if I could study everything that he has said on the subject and come back to him to discuss it in detail. I will not take up any more of the committee's time on the amendment.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Convener, that danger will not arise because amendment 251 is a probing amendment.Amendment 251 probes whether the provision of advice or guidance to children is intended to be included within the scope of regulated work. The Law Society of Scotland has questioned whether the ...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
In the light of the minister's assurances, I will not press amendment 240.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Amendment 240 is a probing amendment that was lodged in response to concerns of the central registered body in Scotland, which is referred to in the amendment and which acts as a clearing house and advisory service for the free disclosure checks that are currently given to vol...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Amendment 123 is an extremely important amendment, because the bill as drafted does not extend to fostering. That must be rectified, because the role of foster carer could present an opportunity to harm a child. Moreover, children who are fostered are generally even more vulne...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Committee
20 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I second the convener's words of welcome for what might be the final day of stage 2 consideration of this bill. I start by saying that I strongly support the convener's amendments in this group, which are essential. However, I will not be moving my amendment 238, because part ...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Chamber
15 Feb 2007
SCOTTISH EXECUTIVE · Schools (Surveillance Technology)
Will the minister accept that, ever since the outrage at Dunblane, sensible security is extremely important in schools for teachers and pupils and for parents, when they visit the schools? Does he agree that a safe and secure school environment is an essential requirement?Will...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Chamber
15 Feb 2007
Education
It is obviously important that parents have a say but, ultimately, the head teacher must make the decision. More decisions should be in local control. Parents have a part to play in influencing that process, but decision making should be in the hands of head teachers.Thirdly, ...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Chamber
15 Feb 2007
Education
Fiona Hyslop has made a very good speech and I welcome the fact that the independent members have raised the important work of Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Education. The inspectors are a group of immensely highly qualified men and women whose reputation for engaging in the p...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
The commitment on this matter has been given by the minister, so I will certainly move the amendment.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I am reluctant to press this amendment to a vote now, but I wish to return to the subject at a later stage. I fear that the minister's offers might be insufficient to achieve the required purposes.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Amendment 231, which was lodged on behalf of the SCVO, would waive vetting fees for paid staff who work in the voluntary sector, which is different from the effect of amendment 233. The fee waiver would apply during phasing in of retrospective checking and during the more norm...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
What has been said is obvious and true.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I do not wish to press amendment 215. Instead, I thank the minister for his constructive contribution and for what sounded like a substantial concession that voluntary organisations will find enormously important. We eagerly await the exact wording of the stage 3 amendment tha...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
The amendments in my name are amendments 215, 216 and 218. Amendments 215 and 216 are paving amendments for amendment 218. My amendments, and amendments 217 and 262, in Elaine Murray's name, and amendments 219 and 263, in Fiona Hyslop's name, would have a similar effect in tha...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I thank the minister for his speech, which is almost a response before the argument has been put.I will explain the Law Society of Scotland's reasoning. It was concerned that, under section 17(4), an individual would not be in a position to make representations that a relevant...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I hope that the minister will consider amendment 175 sympathetically. The amendment is necessary to protect the innocent and will guard against the destruction of a person's career through tittle-tattle or malicious allegations.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I will not press amendment 163. When an individual is wrongly accused by somebody who may have an obsession and who acts in what can only be described as a vexatious manner, that is a sensitive issue. If dealing with that is always left until after listing has occurred, an inn...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
It might be for the minister to reply before I do.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
The effect of amendment 163 would be to provide for the individual to be allowed to make representations with regard to prescribed information. The reason for the amendment is that the Law Society is concerned that an individual can be referred and consequently considered for ...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I thank the minister for explaining that there are no major administrative problems with having two lists and that there are significant numbers who should not be on both lists. Consequently, I will not press amendment 149. However, amendment 23 is absolutely acceptable—it wou...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Committee
13 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
First, I thank the convener for arranging the groupings so quickly and the clerks for working overtime to ensure that that was possible. On a general procedural point, the committee must consider 200 amendments in two days, which is a very constricted timescale and puts everyo...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con Chamber
08 Feb 2007
Early Years Education, Development and Care
Today we return to debating policies for early years education and child care. As Fiona Hyslop and the minister stated, they are areas of tremendous importance. Getting them right will be enormously beneficial for children, as they will ensure that children get off to a positi...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
07 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
This is an extremely unsatisfactory position. I see both arguments clearly. We are all in favour of the protection of children, and comparable legislation has been enacted elsewhere in Britain. We do not want to be in a position where we could be seen as lukewarm on the princi...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
07 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
Do we have to make a decision now? I suppose we do.
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
07 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
Are we some way behind the legislation south of the border?
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
07 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
Is it the case that comparable legislation has gone through for the rest of Britain?
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
07 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
When will the minister be able to give a final view on preferred policy options on the issues that are raised in the discussion paper? I ask because dissolution of Parliament is expected to be on 2 April and it is anticipated that all legislation will get through by the end of...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
07 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
My next question is a difficult and sensitive one. How can we be certain that every reasonable effort will be made to ensure that those who come to work here from other countries will be checked to ensure that it is safe for them to work with vulnerable groups? Is it difficult...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
07 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
The legislation, in large measure, arose from the appalling murders and tragedy at Soham. Will your collaboration with Whitehall ensure that the various United Kingdom schemes will be compatible and will dovetail?
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
07 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
Am I correct in saying that at present there is a telephone helpline for anyone who is in doubt?
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con Committee
07 Feb 2007
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Bill
Is that something that could usefully be covered in guidance at a later stage?
← Back to list
Chamber

Plenary, 22 Mar 2007

22 Mar 2007 · S2 · Plenary
Item of business
Education
I thank Margaret Smith and Hugh Henry very much for their kind words.

I support the teaching of history in schools, although not for the reason that Margaret Smith suggested—all families have a few skeletons rattling around in their cupboards. [Laughter.] The curriculum should be geared to satisfying the demands of young people throughout our country.

Head teachers are a huge, untapped pool of potential for improving our state school system. In order to become a head, a person must have a teaching qualification and extensive training and experience, not to mention proven leadership qualities. Heads quickly become best placed to know the needs of their schools. In contrast, the Scottish Administration might appear somewhat remote, and the level of micromanagement that it attempts is not achievable through national policy. It would be desirable for every head teacher to be given more freedom to respond to local requirements.

The Executive's policy on devolved school management has been more successful than we anticipated it would be, although there has been variation from area to area—if the minister is wondering how I know that, it is because we checked up under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002, which the Executive introduced.

This is the last education debate in the Parliament before the election. We pledge ourselves to making certain that Scotland will have an education system that lives up to our proud traditions. Our education system must be a shining example to the world and it must be second to none. I wish my colleagues who, subject to the electorate's wishes, might be here in the next session of the Parliament every good fortune in making certain that Scotland's education system is every bit as good as the very best in the world. [Applause.]

I move amendment S2M-5775.1, to leave out from "notes" to end and insert:

"supports giving top priority to ensuring that our education system enables every child to find fulfilment according to his or her ability, aptitude and inclination; believes that head teachers should have greater freedom to make decisions relating to their schools, in co-operation with parents and pupils, and further believes that particular areas for giving greater control include budgets, permanent exclusions, wearing of uniforms, setting, and the continuing professional development of teachers in their schools."

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Trish Godman): Lab
The next item of business is a debate on motion S2M-5775, in the name of Hugh Henry, on celebrating success in Scottish education.
The Minister for Education and Young People (Hugh Henry): Lab
I am delighted to open a debate that gives us an opportunity to put on record all the significant developments that are taking place in Scottish education.As...
Tricia Marwick (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP): SNP
If such substantial progress has been made since the Labour-Liberal Executive came to power, can the minister explain why in 1997 there were 1,707 teachers i...
Hugh Henry: Lab
The Executive has delivered on its commitment to bring in more teachers. Indeed, by August, we will have met our target of 53,000 teachers in Scotland. As th...
Mr David Davidson (North East Scotland) (Con): Con
The minister is not the only one who visits schools in Scotland; as he would expect, we all do. Secondary schools have been telling us that a quarter of prim...
Hugh Henry: Lab
We can address some of the issues that still have to be tackled. The fact is that Scotland's performance ranks in the top third of Organisation for Economic ...
Richard Lochhead (Moray) (SNP): SNP
Does the minister agree that it is unfortunate that many of the rural schools in Moray that have received excellent inspection reports in recent years have b...
Hugh Henry: Lab
Any such decision—and, indeed, the quality of education in the area—is a matter for the local authority in Moray. However, we are determined to raise standar...
Fiona Hyslop (Lothians) (SNP): SNP
I greatly appreciated the minister's list of visits to schools in marginal constituencies with Labour members who are in their final days in office.The SNP i...
Margo MacDonald (Lothians) (Ind): Ind
Does the member have any information on the geographical location and sociological demographics of the classes that she describes as being too big?
Fiona Hyslop: SNP
Margo MacDonald makes a good point. Indeed, in the debate on the Crichton campus at lunch time, the issue was raised in relation to Dumfries and Galloway. Pe...
Jeremy Purvis (Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale) (LD): LD
Will the member give way?
Fiona Hyslop: SNP
I want to move on.We should be introducing a baccalaureate as a group award in highers for top performance, first in languages and then in science, to encour...
Mr Davidson: Con
Will Ms Hyslop enlighten us on the science baccalaureate? What plans does the SNP have to fill the current shortages in science teachers at the top end of sc...
Fiona Hyslop: SNP
The SNP plans to maintain teacher numbers in the face of falling school rolls. We will encourage people to become teachers, particularly early years, science...
Hugh Henry: Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Fiona Hyslop: SNP
I am in my last minute.The extra cost of PPP finance means that schools will lose at least £900,000 that could be spent on more books, better equipment and m...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton (Lothians) (Con): Con
Like Fiona Hyslop, we all believe strongly in the pursuit of educational excellence. I thank her for her kind words about the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. I...
Hugh Henry: Lab
I pay tribute to Lord James for the contribution that he has made to public life in Scotland over many years. He has played a distinguished role not only in ...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con
There have been substantial improvements to Scottish education since before that time. Those improvements have been steady and we must learn from them. Howev...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD
Will the member take an intervention?
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con
I will take a brief intervention, but I have quite a lot to say.
Margaret Smith: LD
Does the member agree that it is important that Scottish history be taught in our schools, if for no other reason than to remind children of the important ro...
Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Con
I thank Margaret Smith and Hugh Henry very much for their kind words.I support the teaching of history in schools, although not for the reason that Margaret ...
Iain Smith (North East Fife) (LD): LD
I am pleased to follow Lord James Douglas-Hamilton in the debate, because that gives me an opportunity to pay tribute to him after his final speech in this p...
Margo MacDonald: Ind
Will the Treasury have an interest in whether the PPP-style mechanism can be replaced with another one, or will it be something that is just for the Scottish...
Iain Smith: LD
My understanding is that the Scottish Parliament does not have the power to create the bonds that the SNP proposes to have, which means that the policy would...
Mr Adam Ingram (South of Scotland) (SNP): SNP
We are going to abolish the council tax, not cap it.
Iain Smith: LD
Whether it is the council tax or the local income tax that is capped, it will starve local authorities of resources. Worse than that, the SNP will put all th...
Dr Elaine Murray (Dumfries) (Lab): Lab
I start by adding to the tributes to Lord James Douglas-Hamilton. Some 30 or so years ago, Lord James was my MP, although I am afraid that I did not vote for...