Chamber
Plenary, 13 Sep 2007
13 Sep 2007 · S3 · Plenary
Item of business
Angus Sinclair Case
The Lord Advocate:
Watch on SPTV
The fact that witnesses were willing to come from all parts of the world to give evidence in this case and to assist in the investigation is a testament to the good citizens we have in this country. Over the years, more than 14,000 statements were obtained in the investigation, which illustrates the scale of the inquiry and the willingness of members of the public to assist in the administration of justice.
As far as restoring confidence in the system is concerned, convictions happen every day. Although we often see headlines about those convictions, there is little recognition of the work that has been done to secure them or, indeed, of the fact that they have been secured through prosecutors' efforts. The prosecutors in this country go about their business quietly, modestly and without the public annunciations of success that happen in many jurisdictions. Unlike attorneys in other countries, Scottish prosecutors do not come to the doors of the court to proclaim the success of their case. As a result, the many cases that are prosecuted successfully day in, day out do not register in the public psyche in the way that failures do. After all, it is the failures that make the headlines.
We should not lose confidence in the Scottish criminal justice system, or even suggest that public confidence has gone, simply because of one major and very tragic failure. There has been a frenzy around one case—or, indeed, around one of a number of high-profile cases—when, in fact, the picture day in, day out is very different.
I hope that the public acknowledge the work that is carried out by the public prosecutors. In fact, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service's efficiency was highlighted in evidence on the Howat report that was presented this week to the Justice Committee, and many witnesses and victims of crime write to thank procurators fiscal for their work. That work, which is unsavoury, traumatic and difficult, happens very much behind the scenes, and the Parliament and the public of Scotland should be grateful to the prosecutors for carrying it out.
The prosecution service is not the most lucrative area of law in which to pursue a career. Those who come into the public prosecution service do so in the knowledge that they will be in a public forum, that they will have to work with great tragedy and that, when they prosecute cases, they are more and more likely to be on television and to be photographed. They are good people who work extremely hard, and I hope that, if public confidence in the system has been dented as a result of this case, it will be restored.
As far as restoring confidence in the system is concerned, convictions happen every day. Although we often see headlines about those convictions, there is little recognition of the work that has been done to secure them or, indeed, of the fact that they have been secured through prosecutors' efforts. The prosecutors in this country go about their business quietly, modestly and without the public annunciations of success that happen in many jurisdictions. Unlike attorneys in other countries, Scottish prosecutors do not come to the doors of the court to proclaim the success of their case. As a result, the many cases that are prosecuted successfully day in, day out do not register in the public psyche in the way that failures do. After all, it is the failures that make the headlines.
We should not lose confidence in the Scottish criminal justice system, or even suggest that public confidence has gone, simply because of one major and very tragic failure. There has been a frenzy around one case—or, indeed, around one of a number of high-profile cases—when, in fact, the picture day in, day out is very different.
I hope that the public acknowledge the work that is carried out by the public prosecutors. In fact, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service's efficiency was highlighted in evidence on the Howat report that was presented this week to the Justice Committee, and many witnesses and victims of crime write to thank procurators fiscal for their work. That work, which is unsavoury, traumatic and difficult, happens very much behind the scenes, and the Parliament and the public of Scotland should be grateful to the prosecutors for carrying it out.
The prosecution service is not the most lucrative area of law in which to pursue a career. Those who come into the public prosecution service do so in the knowledge that they will be in a public forum, that they will have to work with great tragedy and that, when they prosecute cases, they are more and more likely to be on television and to be photographed. They are good people who work extremely hard, and I hope that, if public confidence in the system has been dented as a result of this case, it will be restored.
In the same item of business
The Presiding Officer (Alex Fergusson):
NPA
The next item of business is a statement by Elish Angiolini on the case of Angus Sinclair. The Lord Advocate will take questions at the end of her statement ...
The Lord Advocate (Elish Angiolini):
Presiding Officer, I am grateful to you for allowing me to address Parliament on this important issue. Some of the details of what I have to say are necessar...
The Presiding Officer:
NPA
As I intimated earlier, the Lord Advocate will take questions on issues that were raised in her statement. I intend to allow until around 15:55 for questions...
Margaret Curran (Glasgow Baillieston) (Lab):
Lab
I thank the Lord Advocate for coming to the chamber. She will be aware of the widespread concern throughout Scotland that these vile crimes have gone unpunis...
The Lord Advocate:
Of course, although it can only pale in comparison to the pain that the families of Helen Scott and Christine Eadie must be feeling, no one could feel anythi...
Nigel Don (North East Scotland) (SNP):
SNP
Continuing on the issue of a right of appeal, I recognise that the Lord Advocate does not currently have that right, although such a right is available in ot...
The Lord Advocate:
On such a hypothetical situation, it is difficult to speculate. However, given the Crown's submissions at the conclusion of the Crown's case and given what I...
Paul Martin (Glasgow Springburn) (Lab):
Lab
I echo Margaret Curran's comments about the families of the victims. They have behaved in an impeccable and constructive manner following the trial and they ...
The Lord Advocate:
I am surprised at Mr Martin's comments. Clearly, the information that I have been given has been provided by the lawyers who were in court. I expect that I h...
Bill Aitken (Glasgow) (Con):
Con
Both in the press and by other means this week, I have asked the Lord Advocate to answer three questions. First, was there a full appreciation of the difficu...
The Lord Advocate:
As I have mentioned, I have raised the issue of the appeal with the Cabinet Secretary for Justice. Clearly, it is for the Executive, collectively, not for me...
Roseanna Cunningham (Perth) (SNP):
SNP
The anguish of the victims' families can barely be imagined. Will the Lord Advocate therefore agree with me that this case highlights the need for greater op...
The Lord Advocate:
As I said in my statement, the decision about what takes place during the course of the trial must be with the prosecutor. There must be trust in the prosecu...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD):
LD
I thank the Lord Advocate for making such a full statement this afternoon. It is only right, given the notoriety not only of the case but of the judgment, th...
The Lord Advocate:
I agree entirely with the sentiments that the member expresses about the extent of this tragedy for the families and the dignity that they have shown through...
Ian McKee (Lothians) (SNP):
SNP
I thank the Lord Advocate for her full and helpful explanation of what is going on. It has reinforced my confidence in the ability and integrity of the prose...
The Lord Advocate:
It is difficult to be critical of what took place some 20 years ago. Some of the advances in forensic science and knowledge have been utterly unexpected deve...
Sarah Boyack (Edinburgh Central) (Lab):
Lab
Does the Lord Advocate acknowledge that local people feel a deep sense of injustice about this case, which has been raised with me from time to time in the e...
The Lord Advocate:
The fact that witnesses were willing to come from all parts of the world to give evidence in this case and to assist in the investigation is a testament to t...
Stuart McMillan (West of Scotland) (SNP):
SNP
Is the Lord Advocate confident that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service has the capacity to deal with major cases, bearing in mind that, as she po...
The Lord Advocate:
Over the past five years, there has been a sizeable increase in the number of prosecutors and the cohort of Crown counsel has increased from 18 to 25, with e...
Margo MacDonald (Lothians) (Ind):
Ind
I thank the Lord Advocate for her detailed and clear statement. Lord Clarke in his opinion stated:"There was no forensic evidence linking the accused with ac...
The Lord Advocate:
I will answer the second question first. In the prosecution service, procurators fiscal investigate crime and prosecute in the sheriff and district court. Wi...
David Stewart (Highlands and Islands) (Lab):
Lab
Does the Lord Advocate share my view that a case can be made for allowing juries sight of analogous previous convictions when defendants have a history of pr...
The Lord Advocate:
In Scotland, evidence of a previous conviction can be admitted in the course of a trial only very rarely and in exceptional circumstances. That is not the ca...