Chamber
Plenary, 13 Feb 2002
13 Feb 2002 · S1 · Plenary
Item of business
Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
I cannot support the Conservative members' stage 3 amendments 2, 3 and 18. That will come as no surprise, as I opposed them at stage 2 and my arguments remain the same. They are arguments that, I hope, are based on clear rationality; if the will of Parliament is to ban mounted hunting, any landowner who knowingly permits that activity must surely be committing a crime.
The wording that is used in section 1(3) is "knowingly permits". I fail to see why section 1 should be amended. I agree with the remarks that were made by Tricia Marwick, although I may not express the argument in quite the same way. I also endorse and support the Executive amendments in the group. Frankly, they are amendments that serve to tidy up the bill. I hope that members will support them. I urge members to reject the Conservative members' amendments 2, 3 and 18 and to support the Executive amendments in the group. I hope that my sponsorship of the Executive amendments will add considerably to the vote. I am not sure whether my role in the chamber makes me a quarried species—time will tell.
I will be brief, but I want to make some serious remarks. We are engaged in a serious activity—the most serious activity that legislators undertake—which is the activity of creating new crimes. David Mundell was right to quote from the Justice and Home Affairs Committee report to the Rural Development Committee. That report rightly acknowledged that:
"the Parliament should be scrupulous in ensuring that the scope and extent of the criminal conduct is as tightly defined as possible".
The reason for that is that surely it would be wrong for anyone to turn people who are performing legitimate control activities in the countryside into potential criminals. We have a serious duty today and I hope that we will all have a free vote on the matter. That will ensure that, at the end of the day, we do not turn gamekeepers, terrier and hill pack men into potential criminals.
At stage 2, my approach was to attempt to improve what I regarded as fundamental flaws—conceptually and in drafting terms—in the bill. As Lord Watson will acknowledge, many critics at stage 1 expressed grave concerns about the need to protect those who perform pest control activities. My efforts at stage 2 were in no sense whatever intended to wreck the bill; they were intended to make the bill workable. I say that as someone who will never be accused of being the bill's most fervent supporter.
The wording that is used in section 1(3) is "knowingly permits". I fail to see why section 1 should be amended. I agree with the remarks that were made by Tricia Marwick, although I may not express the argument in quite the same way. I also endorse and support the Executive amendments in the group. Frankly, they are amendments that serve to tidy up the bill. I hope that members will support them. I urge members to reject the Conservative members' amendments 2, 3 and 18 and to support the Executive amendments in the group. I hope that my sponsorship of the Executive amendments will add considerably to the vote. I am not sure whether my role in the chamber makes me a quarried species—time will tell.
I will be brief, but I want to make some serious remarks. We are engaged in a serious activity—the most serious activity that legislators undertake—which is the activity of creating new crimes. David Mundell was right to quote from the Justice and Home Affairs Committee report to the Rural Development Committee. That report rightly acknowledged that:
"the Parliament should be scrupulous in ensuring that the scope and extent of the criminal conduct is as tightly defined as possible".
The reason for that is that surely it would be wrong for anyone to turn people who are performing legitimate control activities in the countryside into potential criminals. We have a serious duty today and I hope that we will all have a free vote on the matter. That will ensure that, at the end of the day, we do not turn gamekeepers, terrier and hill pack men into potential criminals.
At stage 2, my approach was to attempt to improve what I regarded as fundamental flaws—conceptually and in drafting terms—in the bill. As Lord Watson will acknowledge, many critics at stage 1 expressed grave concerns about the need to protect those who perform pest control activities. My efforts at stage 2 were in no sense whatever intended to wreck the bill; they were intended to make the bill workable. I say that as someone who will never be accused of being the bill's most fervent supporter.
In the same item of business
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Mr George Reid):
SNP
Before we begin the stage 3 proceedings on the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill, I want to make the usual announcements about the procedures to be ...
David Mundell (South of Scotland) (Con):
Con
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Although I accept the right of the Presiding Officer to select amendments for the stage 3 debate, I want to draw your...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I am being very lenient in allowing you to put that on the record, Mr Mundell.The Presiding Officers give serious consideration to all amendments, according ...
Section 1—Prohibition and offences
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
Amendment 2, in the name of David Mundell, is grouped with amendments 34, 3, 35, 38, 44, 45, 54, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 67, 69 and 18. Amendment 2 does not pre-...
David Mundell:
Con
There is some misapprehension that amendments that are lodged to find out the intention of those who are promoting the bill are deliberate wrecking amendment...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I call the minister to speak to amendments 34, 35, 38, 44, 45, 54, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 67 and 69, and the other amendments in the group.
The Minister for Environment and Rural Development (Ross Finnie):
LD
Thank you, Presiding Officer. Despite that long list, I assure members that I shall be mercifully brief.I start by making it clear that my position as minist...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I call Alex Fergusson to speak to amendment 18 and the other amendments in the group.
Alex Fergusson (South of Scotland) (Con):
Con
I have no comment to make on the other amendments in the group. I will keep my remarks on amendment 18 brief. The amendment seeks to make an insertion at sec...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I will not be able to call all speakers at all stages of this debate, but I will try to keep a balanced coverage.
Tricia Marwick (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP):
SNP
Before I start, I record that I have received legal advice from the Scottish Campaign Against Hunting With Dogs and Advocates for Animals.This Parliament, an...
Alex Fergusson:
Con
Will the member give way?
Tricia Marwick:
SNP
Everyone in this Parliament has a duty to ensure that that does not happen. Bristow Muldoon, I and others will do our best to guide members through this stag...
David Mundell rose—
Con
Tricia Marwick:
SNP
I had hoped that Alex Fergusson, following his admission in The Daily Telegraph last week that his Rural Development Committee had let in wrecking amendments...
Alex Fergusson:
Con
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I am quite aware that as convener of the Rural Development Committee, and as an MSP, I am open to criticism for my ac...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I make no comment on that.
Tricia Marwick:
SNP
After the first of perhaps many bogus points of order, I will continue.Hare coursing is one of the key activities that the Parliament thought it was banning....
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
The member has one minute.
Tricia Marwick:
SNP
Mounted fox hunts also involve two groups of people.Alex Fergusson's amendment 18 was roundly slammed, even in the Rural Development Committee. Rhoda Grant m...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber) (SNP):
SNP
I cannot support the Conservative members' stage 3 amendments 2, 3 and 18. That will come as no surprise, as I opposed them at stage 2 and my arguments remai...
Mr Mike Rumbles (West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) (LD):
LD
I support the Executive amendments in the group, because they will tidy up the bill. Like Fergus Ewing, I oppose amendments 2, 3 and 18. In particular, I opp...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I want to make progress and regret that some members will not be called. I move straight to the member-in-charge, Bristow Muldoon.
Bristow Muldoon (Livingston) (Lab):
Lab
I welcome the opportunity to comment on this group of amendments and to speak as one of the co-members in charge of the bill. I thank Mike Watson and Tricia ...
Phil Gallie (South of Scotland) (Con):
Con
Will the member give way?
Bristow Muldoon:
Lab
No. I want to respond to amendments 2, 3 and 18. Plenty of members have spoken in support of them.
Phil Gallie:
Con
I am aware of that, but—
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
Order. The member is not giving way, Mr Gallie.
Bristow Muldoon:
Lab
Fergus Ewing made a telling point against David Mundell's suggestion. He said:"Having decided, as a committee, that it is an offence to deliberately hunt a w...