Chamber
Plenary, 13 Feb 2002
13 Feb 2002 · S1 · Plenary
Item of business
Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
Thank you, Presiding Officer. Despite that long list, I assure members that I shall be mercifully brief.
I start by making it clear that my position as minister and the position of Allan Wilson, the Deputy Minister for Environment and Rural Development, are quite simple. We are trying to do a number of things. We are seeking to move amendments where we believe genuinely that, if it is the will of Parliament to pass the bill, the context and content of the bill must be in a form that will eventually make it workable in both a practical and a legal sense—but primarily the latter. However, we have no position on the policy instrument. After all, the bill is a member's bill. Obviously, Allan Wilson and I have to comment where any amendment or section cuts across existing Executive policy. Finally, we might wish to indicate areas where we think that the amendment or removal of a provision might cause some difficulties even if it does not lead to the bill being unworkable. My colleague and I will proceed on that basis.
David Mundell moved amendment 2. The group also includes amendment 3. The changes that are sought by those amendments are fundamental and one would normally expect them to have been made at stage 2. Clearly, it is for the chamber to decide whether the amendments are appropriate at this stage.
Like all the amendments in the group, amendments 34 and 35 are consequential upon a stage 2 amendment that changed the manner in which section 1(1) was expressed. Given the terms in which that section is now expressed, it is clearly no longer appropriate to refer to contravening subsection (1).
The remainder of the amendments in my name in the group—amendments 38, 44, 45, 54, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 67 and 69—are drafting amendments. I hope that they will all be accepted. They are merely technical amendments that are designed to reflect a change of wording in the offence provision and to make its interpretation clear and unambiguous.
The group also contains Alex Fergusson's amendment 18, which no doubt he will move, which seeks to define a defence to the offence. In terms of interpreting the bill—if it is passed—we do not regard amendment 18 as helpful, but we have no further comment to make on it.
I start by making it clear that my position as minister and the position of Allan Wilson, the Deputy Minister for Environment and Rural Development, are quite simple. We are trying to do a number of things. We are seeking to move amendments where we believe genuinely that, if it is the will of Parliament to pass the bill, the context and content of the bill must be in a form that will eventually make it workable in both a practical and a legal sense—but primarily the latter. However, we have no position on the policy instrument. After all, the bill is a member's bill. Obviously, Allan Wilson and I have to comment where any amendment or section cuts across existing Executive policy. Finally, we might wish to indicate areas where we think that the amendment or removal of a provision might cause some difficulties even if it does not lead to the bill being unworkable. My colleague and I will proceed on that basis.
David Mundell moved amendment 2. The group also includes amendment 3. The changes that are sought by those amendments are fundamental and one would normally expect them to have been made at stage 2. Clearly, it is for the chamber to decide whether the amendments are appropriate at this stage.
Like all the amendments in the group, amendments 34 and 35 are consequential upon a stage 2 amendment that changed the manner in which section 1(1) was expressed. Given the terms in which that section is now expressed, it is clearly no longer appropriate to refer to contravening subsection (1).
The remainder of the amendments in my name in the group—amendments 38, 44, 45, 54, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 67 and 69—are drafting amendments. I hope that they will all be accepted. They are merely technical amendments that are designed to reflect a change of wording in the offence provision and to make its interpretation clear and unambiguous.
The group also contains Alex Fergusson's amendment 18, which no doubt he will move, which seeks to define a defence to the offence. In terms of interpreting the bill—if it is passed—we do not regard amendment 18 as helpful, but we have no further comment to make on it.
In the same item of business
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Mr George Reid):
SNP
Before we begin the stage 3 proceedings on the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Bill, I want to make the usual announcements about the procedures to be ...
David Mundell (South of Scotland) (Con):
Con
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Although I accept the right of the Presiding Officer to select amendments for the stage 3 debate, I want to draw your...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I am being very lenient in allowing you to put that on the record, Mr Mundell.The Presiding Officers give serious consideration to all amendments, according ...
Section 1—Prohibition and offences
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
Amendment 2, in the name of David Mundell, is grouped with amendments 34, 3, 35, 38, 44, 45, 54, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 67, 69 and 18. Amendment 2 does not pre-...
David Mundell:
Con
There is some misapprehension that amendments that are lodged to find out the intention of those who are promoting the bill are deliberate wrecking amendment...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I call the minister to speak to amendments 34, 35, 38, 44, 45, 54, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 67 and 69, and the other amendments in the group.
The Minister for Environment and Rural Development (Ross Finnie):
LD
Thank you, Presiding Officer. Despite that long list, I assure members that I shall be mercifully brief.I start by making it clear that my position as minist...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I call Alex Fergusson to speak to amendment 18 and the other amendments in the group.
Alex Fergusson (South of Scotland) (Con):
Con
I have no comment to make on the other amendments in the group. I will keep my remarks on amendment 18 brief. The amendment seeks to make an insertion at sec...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I will not be able to call all speakers at all stages of this debate, but I will try to keep a balanced coverage.
Tricia Marwick (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP):
SNP
Before I start, I record that I have received legal advice from the Scottish Campaign Against Hunting With Dogs and Advocates for Animals.This Parliament, an...
Alex Fergusson:
Con
Will the member give way?
Tricia Marwick:
SNP
Everyone in this Parliament has a duty to ensure that that does not happen. Bristow Muldoon, I and others will do our best to guide members through this stag...
David Mundell rose—
Con
Tricia Marwick:
SNP
I had hoped that Alex Fergusson, following his admission in The Daily Telegraph last week that his Rural Development Committee had let in wrecking amendments...
Alex Fergusson:
Con
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I am quite aware that as convener of the Rural Development Committee, and as an MSP, I am open to criticism for my ac...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I make no comment on that.
Tricia Marwick:
SNP
After the first of perhaps many bogus points of order, I will continue.Hare coursing is one of the key activities that the Parliament thought it was banning....
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
The member has one minute.
Tricia Marwick:
SNP
Mounted fox hunts also involve two groups of people.Alex Fergusson's amendment 18 was roundly slammed, even in the Rural Development Committee. Rhoda Grant m...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber) (SNP):
SNP
I cannot support the Conservative members' stage 3 amendments 2, 3 and 18. That will come as no surprise, as I opposed them at stage 2 and my arguments remai...
Mr Mike Rumbles (West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) (LD):
LD
I support the Executive amendments in the group, because they will tidy up the bill. Like Fergus Ewing, I oppose amendments 2, 3 and 18. In particular, I opp...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I want to make progress and regret that some members will not be called. I move straight to the member-in-charge, Bristow Muldoon.
Bristow Muldoon (Livingston) (Lab):
Lab
I welcome the opportunity to comment on this group of amendments and to speak as one of the co-members in charge of the bill. I thank Mike Watson and Tricia ...
Phil Gallie (South of Scotland) (Con):
Con
Will the member give way?
Bristow Muldoon:
Lab
No. I want to respond to amendments 2, 3 and 18. Plenty of members have spoken in support of them.
Phil Gallie:
Con
I am aware of that, but—
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
Order. The member is not giving way, Mr Gallie.
Bristow Muldoon:
Lab
Fergus Ewing made a telling point against David Mundell's suggestion. He said:"Having decided, as a committee, that it is an offence to deliberately hunt a w...