Committee
Transport and the Environment Committee, 04 Oct 2000
04 Oct 2000 · S1 · Transport and the Environment Committee
Item of business
Transport (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
While we are waiting for the minister, I will explain to members of the press and the public—and remind committee members—what we are about to do in this stage 2 process. Some of you are seasoned veterans at this game; I have to declare that I am not and that this is the first stage 2 process that I have chaired. I look forward to it with some trepidation. It will be interesting.
Members should have a copy of the bill, and the marshalled list of amendments and suggested groupings of amendments for day 1 that were published this morning. The amendments are grouped to give some order to the debate and to assist us in our work. The order in which they are called and moved is dictated by the marshalled list. All amendments will be called in turn from the marshalled list and they will be taken in that order. We cannot move backwards in the marshalled list: once part of it is gone, it is gone. The groupings were for me to decide under rule 9.10.12 of standing orders.
There will be only one debate on each group. In some groups there may be several amendments—some may be technical, some may be more substantive. I will call the proposer of the first amendment in the group, who should speak to and move the amendment. I will then call other members, including the proposers of all the other amendments in the group. Those members should note that they should not move their amendments after speaking to them; I will call them to do so at the appropriate time. At that time, it would be helpful if members would indicate whether they intend to move their amendment. If any member does not want to move an amendment, they should simply say, "Not moved," when I call the amendment.
The minister will be called to speak on each group. Other members should indicate a wish to speak in the usual manner—a nod or a wave. Following the debate on a group, I will clarify whether the member who moved the first amendment still wishes to press it to a decision. If not, he or she may seek the agreement of the committee to withdraw it. If it is not withdrawn, I will put the question on the amendment to the committee. If we disagree at that point, we will have a division by a show of hands. It is important that members keep their hands raised until the clerks have recorded the vote. I will then read out the result.
I remind MSPs present that only members of the Transport and the Environment Committee may vote. Other MSPs may speak to and move amendments, but they may not vote. After we have debated the amendments, committee members must decide whether to agree to each section or schedule of the bill as a whole. Given the size of the bill, we are not required to have debates on those decisions. If members do not want to speak, they do not have to.
Members will have seen the announcement in yesterday's business bulletin that states that we will not go beyond section 11 of the bill today—although it is by no means guaranteed that we will get to section 11 today. We will consider our progress and publish details in the business bulletin of the decided end point for our next meeting.
The veterans will have understood that; the new ones may have some questions.
Members should have a copy of the bill, and the marshalled list of amendments and suggested groupings of amendments for day 1 that were published this morning. The amendments are grouped to give some order to the debate and to assist us in our work. The order in which they are called and moved is dictated by the marshalled list. All amendments will be called in turn from the marshalled list and they will be taken in that order. We cannot move backwards in the marshalled list: once part of it is gone, it is gone. The groupings were for me to decide under rule 9.10.12 of standing orders.
There will be only one debate on each group. In some groups there may be several amendments—some may be technical, some may be more substantive. I will call the proposer of the first amendment in the group, who should speak to and move the amendment. I will then call other members, including the proposers of all the other amendments in the group. Those members should note that they should not move their amendments after speaking to them; I will call them to do so at the appropriate time. At that time, it would be helpful if members would indicate whether they intend to move their amendment. If any member does not want to move an amendment, they should simply say, "Not moved," when I call the amendment.
The minister will be called to speak on each group. Other members should indicate a wish to speak in the usual manner—a nod or a wave. Following the debate on a group, I will clarify whether the member who moved the first amendment still wishes to press it to a decision. If not, he or she may seek the agreement of the committee to withdraw it. If it is not withdrawn, I will put the question on the amendment to the committee. If we disagree at that point, we will have a division by a show of hands. It is important that members keep their hands raised until the clerks have recorded the vote. I will then read out the result.
I remind MSPs present that only members of the Transport and the Environment Committee may vote. Other MSPs may speak to and move amendments, but they may not vote. After we have debated the amendments, committee members must decide whether to agree to each section or schedule of the bill as a whole. Given the size of the bill, we are not required to have debates on those decisions. If members do not want to speak, they do not have to.
Members will have seen the announcement in yesterday's business bulletin that states that we will not go beyond section 11 of the bill today—although it is by no means guaranteed that we will get to section 11 today. We will consider our progress and publish details in the business bulletin of the decided end point for our next meeting.
The veterans will have understood that; the new ones may have some questions.
In the same item of business
The Convener:
Lab
While we are waiting for the minister, I will explain to members of the press and the public—and remind committee members—what we are about to do in this sta...
Bruce Crawford (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP):
SNP
I want to be sure that I have understood. I think you said that if a member's amendment is the first one in any given group, the member should move it at tha...
The Convener:
Lab
Yes, it is.We begin with amendment 52, which is in the name of Robin Harper and stands on its own.
Robin Harper (Lothians) (Green):
Green
I will explain amendment 52 and then move on to the arguments for it. I note a look of concern on the minister's face.
The Minister for Transport and the Environment (Sarah Boyack):
Lab
I thought that there would be opening remarks from me on this stage of the bill, but it is all right—we will come back to them.
The Convener:
Lab
We wrote to the minister about her making some opening remarks on how she sees the bill unrolling. As far as I am aware we received no response, so I did not...
Sarah Boyack:
Lab
During the stage 1 debate in the Parliament, I was conscious that we were dealing with this at breakneck speed. Although I gave out some information as I wen...
The Convener:
Lab
I open the meeting to questions to the minister on any issue that will help our consideration of the bill.
Bruce Crawford:
SNP
Local authorities have a fund called the car park trading account, in which money derived from car parks is ring-fenced for car parks or traffic control. Wou...
Mr Kenny MacAskill (Lothians) (SNP):
SNP
Who will administer the proposed extension of the freight facilities grant to coastal and short-sea shipping and from whose budget will it be funded?
The Convener:
Lab
Are there any other questions?
Sarah Boyack:
Lab
I want to answer those two questions before I lose the thread. I would be happy to explore Bruce Crawford's point in detail. We have talked about the provisi...
Mr MacAskill:
SNP
In view of your comments on enhancing the powers of inspectors, are there any plans to extend fuel duty rebate to community buses, post buses and so on?
Sarah Boyack:
Lab
That issue is similar to concessionary fares, in that we will consider how we want to implement the powers in the bill and shift the way in which we currentl...
Donald Gorrie:
LD
Will you clarify your policy on congestion charges? I may not have fully grasped the bit where you said that motorists driving through a city would not be in...
Sarah Boyack:
Lab
Through traffic in Edinburgh uses the city bypass; it does not go through the city centre and along Princes Street. I am prepared to debate that in detail wh...
Cathy Jamieson (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (Lab):
Lab
I welcome the work that the minister has done on concessionary fares and the possibility that the scheme might be expanded in future. Would that expansion ta...
Sarah Boyack:
Lab
The power is general, so it gives us that flexibility. I want to be clear and to manage people's expectations about what our short-term priorities are. The p...
Cathy Jamieson:
Lab
That is helpful. I wanted to be clear about that. I appreciate the difficulties—
Sarah Boyack:
Lab
I want to be clear about how I intend to use that enabling power in the short term.
Janis Hughes (Glasgow Rutherglen) (Lab):
Lab
One of the main transport issues that is raised at my surgery is transport to hospital facilities. Acute services reviews across the country will lead to maj...
Sarah Boyack:
Lab
There are different ways to come at this. You have exposed one of the problems with the bus network—that it is historic. As individuals, we all fight tooth a...
The Convener:
Lab
There are no further questions, so I thank the minister for that overview of the bill. I advise members that the minister will not make such a statement at t...
Before section 1
The Convener:
Lab
I return to where we were, and invite Robin Harper to speak to amendment 52.
Robin Harper:
Green
I thank the clerks for their assistance in preparing the wording of my amendment, which applies to the beginning of the bill, before section 1. The new secti...
Sarah Boyack:
Lab
I do not think that there are any differences between us as far as the importance of local transport strategies is concerned. I would whole-heartedly sign up...
Donald Gorrie:
LD
I was not a member of the committee before, and I missed a previous discussion on the matter. However, I feel that I should support Robin Harper's amendment....
Mr MacAskill:
SNP
I have some sympathy with the amendment, but I do not know that it necessarily provides us with a solution. We seem to be mixing up two matters—the size of a...
Des McNulty (Clydebank and Milngavie) (Lab):
Lab
I agree with Kenny MacAskill, perhaps for the first time, about the need for trans-authority transport planning and about the problems of the present local a...