Meeting of the Parliament 19 March 2026 [Draft]
I welcome both Daniel Johnson’s and Willie Rennie’s comments, as well as those of the cabinet secretary.
Willie Rennie used the word “ambiguity”; other people would use the word “flexibility”. I fully accept that there is a balance to be struck. If we are too rigid, something might be caught that is not meant to be; if we are too relaxed, it is the other way round. The example that we frequently heard in the committee was that, if a child runs across the road, you want to grab them—in any way that you can, frankly—to prevent their being run over. That is why we need a degree of flexibility.
I understand the unions’ point of view and that of the children’s commissioner. I accept that the commissioner’s job is to be on the cautious side. That is absolutely fine, but I suggest that amendment 1 gets the balance roughly right.
Amendment 1 agreed to.
Section 2—Guidance on restraint and seclusion in schools