Meeting of the Parliament 28 January 2026 [Draft]
I will finish replying to the minister’s first intervention before taking a second one from him.
On the second point, which was about wanting up-to-date and reliable information and data, I note that that is what I want—and that is what we had with the amendment that was agreed to at stage 2. What we would have with amendment 60 is a watered-down alternative, because it seeks only to
“provide information about the gull population in coastal and urban areas”.
That is very clear in proposed new subsection (2)(a) in amendment 60, minister. Information is not numbers; it could be just, “The gull population has changed a little” or, “It has changed a lot”, but we would not know what the gull population was. With a survey, we will have raw data that we can use to ensure that we make the best possible decisions with the best possible information.
I will give way to the minister.