Meeting of the Parliament 04 June 2019
No, thank you.
We also need to keep under review the sentencing options that are available to our courts, although the process for doing so is the one that is set out in Pauline McNeill’s amendment, rather than the dog-whistle, grandstanding approach of Liam Kerr.
As Fergus McNeill, professor of criminology at the University Glasgow, points out:
“Legislating for whole life tariffs is regressive and un-necessary. It also communicates a troubling message about giving up on the possibility of human development, turning imprisonment into warehousing.”
Jamie Buchan, lecturer in criminology at Edinburgh Napier University, adds that the likely longer-term effect of introducing the measure would be that
“either judges don’t use it in which case it’s been a waste of time, or the definition of ‘most serious’ creeps outward to encompass more & more cases”,
as we are seeing in England and Wales.
Neither outcome represents progress or would lead to a more effective justice system. I support the amendment in the minister’s name.