Meeting of the Parliament 15 March 2016
I accept that there are what ifs. The conclusion that I draw is that FETA intended to have the work done. As a result of cuts in budget, FETA did not do the work.
The bridgemaster went on to say:
“FETA had the governance of the bridge, but the funding came from a third party. We had to deal with that, but the capital programme included what we felt needed to be carried out”.—[Official Report, Infrastructure and Capital Investment Committee, 27 January 2016; c 13.]
The expertise of the engineers in 2010 indicated that the truss end links needed to be addressed.