Meeting of the Parliament 17 March 2015
It was not Dave Thompson’s worst speech, but I do not want to listen to it again, Presiding Officer.
I join others in congratulating Mike MacKenzie on bringing the debate to the Parliament. I acknowledge his hitherto unremarked-upon connection with the A9, but I notice that he did not claim credit for the part of the A9 that he was responsible for helping to build.
It is clear that the experience that Mike MacKenzie has, arising out of personal tragedy, underscores his personal commitment to road safety and reducing the alcohol limit for driving. That is to be commended, but the political attack that underlies the motion and, perhaps, the debate was betrayed in the peroration to his speech. I do not necessarily see it as Danny Alexander’s role—or the role of any MP, for that matter—simply to get behind the Scottish National Party.
There are undoubtedly concerns about the implications of average-speed cameras and they cannot simply be dismissed as reckless. More than 3,000 highlanders, including local business groups, have called on the Scottish Government to do away with average-speed cameras, and there is a debate to be had.
Murdo Fraser made a valid point about the data that we have seen. It would be foolish of any of us to leap on it and draw conclusions at this stage.