Chamber
Meeting of the Parliament 17 November 2011
17 Nov 2011 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Oil and Gas Sector
In the main, it is an excellent report, about 95 per cent of which I could probably sign up to immediately. There were a couple of issues to do with proposed taxation choices, coupled with the Government’s language and its use of the word “progressive”, that made me wonder what the tone of the debate would be. I was not sure what the Government was driving at through its use of the word “progressive”. On that basis, we did not feel able to agree to the motion, but I agree with the lion’s share of the PWC report.
The quotation that I was about to mention says that there is a need for
“talking up the opportunities for growth and ... dispelling the perception”—
I emphasise that word—
“of managed ... decline.”
All parties in the Parliament want to push forward on that; it is something that the industry must get right if we are to extract the 12 billion to 24 billion barrels of oil that it is predicted are still in the North Sea. As has been pointed out, the value of that oil will be greater than the value of the oil that we have already extracted, which amounts to the best part of 40 billion barrels.
In an intervention, Tavish Scott mentioned decommissioning, the potential value of which, I understand from the PWC report, is enormous, as is the opportunity to export the relevant skills, if the decommissioning process is successful. I note that 37 per cent of that is set to take place by 2020.
It is worth reflecting on some initiatives that the UK Government and Oil & Gas UK have taken forward over the past few months. They are working together constructively to ensure that future announcements and future changes are in the interests of all stakeholders, Government and the industry itself. I am pleased that work is being done to attempt to resolve decommissioning uncertainties in advance of the 2012 budget. I note that consideration is being given to the case for introducing a new category of field that would qualify for field allowance, and I note the announcement, in July of this year, of an increase in the ring-fenced expenditure supplement from 6 to 10 per cent. In addition, a new fiscal forum has been set up and is due to meet in the early part of 2012.
The industry has enormous potential. It has already made an enormous contribution to Scotland, the UK and the wider world, through the exports that the minister mentioned. It is in all our interests that the stakeholders continue to work together over the coming months and years so that we can measure the industry’s future not in years, but in decades.
I move amendment S4M-01349.2, to leave out from “calls” to end.
The quotation that I was about to mention says that there is a need for
“talking up the opportunities for growth and ... dispelling the perception”—
I emphasise that word—
“of managed ... decline.”
All parties in the Parliament want to push forward on that; it is something that the industry must get right if we are to extract the 12 billion to 24 billion barrels of oil that it is predicted are still in the North Sea. As has been pointed out, the value of that oil will be greater than the value of the oil that we have already extracted, which amounts to the best part of 40 billion barrels.
In an intervention, Tavish Scott mentioned decommissioning, the potential value of which, I understand from the PWC report, is enormous, as is the opportunity to export the relevant skills, if the decommissioning process is successful. I note that 37 per cent of that is set to take place by 2020.
It is worth reflecting on some initiatives that the UK Government and Oil & Gas UK have taken forward over the past few months. They are working together constructively to ensure that future announcements and future changes are in the interests of all stakeholders, Government and the industry itself. I am pleased that work is being done to attempt to resolve decommissioning uncertainties in advance of the 2012 budget. I note that consideration is being given to the case for introducing a new category of field that would qualify for field allowance, and I note the announcement, in July of this year, of an increase in the ring-fenced expenditure supplement from 6 to 10 per cent. In addition, a new fiscal forum has been set up and is due to meet in the early part of 2012.
The industry has enormous potential. It has already made an enormous contribution to Scotland, the UK and the wider world, through the exports that the minister mentioned. It is in all our interests that the stakeholders continue to work together over the coming months and years so that we can measure the industry’s future not in years, but in decades.
I move amendment S4M-01349.2, to leave out from “calls” to end.
References in this contribution
Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.
In the same item of business
The Deputy Presiding Officer (John Scott)
Con
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-01349, in the name of Fergus Ewing, on the oil and gas framework.14:58
The Minister for Energy, Enterprise and Tourism (Fergus Ewing)
SNP
Thank you for accommodating this important debate, Presiding Officer. I welcome the opportunity to acknowledge the success of Scotland’s oil and gas sector, ...
Tavish Scott (Shetland Islands) (LD)
LD
Will the minister give way?
Fergus Ewing
SNP
Certainly.
The Deputy Presiding Officer
Con
Liam—
Tavish Scott
LD
I am Tavish Scott, not Liam McArthur.Does the minister recognise that one of the major economic opportunities over the next 15 to 20 years will be in decommi...
Fergus Ewing
SNP
I welcome Tavish Scott’s point; he is absolutely right that decommissioning will present considerable opportunities for Scotland. Just yesterday we received ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer
Con
I am sure that we should be reassured, minister. Perhaps you would like to move on.
Fergus Ewing
SNP
Thank you, Presiding Officer.Access to finance is as much an issue in the oil and gas industry as it is in other industries, and oil companies are finding it...
David Stewart (Highlands and Islands) (Lab)
Lab
I am grateful to the minister for giving way because he is “that sort of minister”.My point is on fallow fields, which—as the minister will be aware—are fiel...
Fergus Ewing
SNP
That is one of a number of factors that concern all members across all parties. I cannot speak for Chris Huhne, but I think that the UK Government is apprise...
The Deputy Presiding Officer
Con
You can have a little more time, if you wish.
Fergus Ewing
SNP
That is very generous of you, Presiding Officer. You are that sort of Presiding Officer.
The Deputy Presiding Officer
Con
That depends on the day.
Fergus Ewing
SNP
Thank you, Presiding Officer. Technological excellence, robust supply chains, a skilled workforce and making best use of the existing onshore and offshore oi...
The Deputy Presiding Officer
Con
My pleasure. Could you please move the motion?
Fergus Ewing
SNP
I move,That the Parliament recognises the continued importance of Scotland’s oil and gas sector to the Scottish and UK economies, its support for 196,000 job...
The Deputy Presiding Officer
Con
Thank you. I call Lewis Macdonald, who has a generous nine minutes.15:12
Lewis Macdonald (North East Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
North Sea oil and gas have now been with us for a working lifetime. Other members, like me, will know people who have retired from the industry, having joine...
Maureen Watt (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP)
SNP
I thank the member for recognising the future of the oil and gas industry. Is it not regrettable that in the second session of this Parliament his ministers—...
Lewis Macdonald
SNP
To be frank, what I regret is that after the minister’s constructive opening—and invitation for us to have a consensual and constructive debate—Maureen Watt ...
Gavin Brown (Lothian) (Con)
Con
We have had an excellent start to the debate. The minister’s speech was ministerial and helpful as opposed to partisan, and Lewis Macdonald’s speech was well...
Mark McDonald (North East Scotland) (SNP)
SNP
I note that the member’s amendment would delete all reference to the PWC report. What aspect of that report does he disagree with so fundamentally that he se...
Gavin Brown
Con
In the main, it is an excellent report, about 95 per cent of which I could probably sign up to immediately. There were a couple of issues to do with proposed...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Elaine Smith)
Lab
We move to the open debate. I can allow speeches of up to seven minutes.15:29
Mark McDonald (North East Scotland) (SNP)
SNP
In June, I had a members’ business debate on oil and gas taxation. It was a constructive debate, which was handled constructively by all parties across the c...
Sarah Boyack (Lothian) (Lab)
Lab
I apologise that I will have to leave for a brief period for a prior commitment with a constituent, although I will be back for the closing speeches.I join c...
Maureen Watt (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP)
SNP
I welcome this debate, because oil and gas is a subject that is very close to my heart; I worked in the industry and went offshore as part of my job for some...
Tavish Scott (Shetland Islands) (LD)
LD
A number of weeks ago, Oil & Gas UK and the French company Total organised a parliamentary visit to the Elgin-Franklin field, which is east of Aberdeen. In o...
Mark McDonald
SNP
Will the member take an intervention?