Committee
Justice Committee 27 April 2010
27 Apr 2010 · S3 · Justice Committee
Item of business
Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Robert Brown
Watch on SPTV
This is a difficult area—there are no two ways about it. One must be cautious about making significant changes in procedures that have applied for a long time, with all the usual arguments about them. A trial is a search for truth and it broadly fulfils that purpose reasonably well. My view is that the basic evidence should be that of the witness—how he or she remembers things—with all its limitations. Oddities will often emerge from that, but they can be explained away without any particular damage being done. That is and ought to be the core evidence.There is an exception for police witnesses, who can be allowed to refer to their notebooks and notes that they made at the time. I think that I am right in saying that that rule applies to other witnesses, although most of us are not organised enough to take notes at the time. Nevertheless, the so-called level playing field argument is spurious in some respects. While the police witness is giving their own statement in their own way, the so-called statements that are given by other witnesses are not statements but precognitions that are taken by somebody else. Although it is reassuring to hear of the changes that are being made to improve the accuracy of such statements, these things always fall down at the level of the weakest, not at the level of the strongest, and there will always be situations in which the procedure, however well intentioned, is not carried through to what goes on at the bottom.We should be cautious about disrupting procedures that have been established for some time. There is a risk that doing so would divert the trial away from a search after truth and into a rather sterile dispute about whether the written precognition was what the witness said in the first place. The minister referred to best evidence. The real issue is what the best evidence is in this context. Is it rehearsed evidence or is it evidence that comes out at the time—with all its limitations—and has to be gone through in further detail?I am a little concerned about the suggestion that inaccuracies can be addressed in advance of the trial, which has a sort of sanitised feel about it. The place to address such oddities is at the trial, when the evidence can be taken in all its glory, one way or the other. There are difficulties with the provisions, but like the convener I am not prepared to push my view against that of the minister, with his officials and his greater resource for considering the issue. However, I remain concerned about some aspects of the matter and hope that it will be kept under close scrutiny as the bill progresses, and as the matter is put into practice in due course.
In the same item of business
The Convener
Agenda item 2 is the principal business of the day—the fifth day of stage 2 proceedings on the Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill. The committee ...
The Convener
Amendment 379, in the name of Robert Brown, is grouped with amendments 126, 127, 389 and 549. If amendment 379 is agreed to, amendments 126 and 127 will be p...
Robert Brown (Glasgow) (LD)
Scotland has—notoriously—the lowest age of criminal responsibility in Europe. The idea of prosecuting a child of eight—or, indeed, of 11—is abhorrent and rid...
The Convener
I concede that this is a complex and difficult matter. All the amendments in the group deal with the age of criminal responsibility or the age at which child...
Richard Baker (North East Scotland) (Lab)
As this is my final amendment at stage 2, I thank the clerks for all their assistance during the process.The convener has alluded to the fact that the issues...
Stewart Maxwell (West of Scotland) (SNP)
I will start where Richard Baker left off. I agree with his closing comments, in which he made some valid points about the age of criminal responsibility. Al...
Angela Constance (Livingston) (SNP)
It will come as no surprise to anybody on the committee that I have considerable sympathy for Robert Brown’s amendment 379. Although the children’s hearings ...
The Convener
There being no further comments from members, I ask the minister to defend himself to Ms Constance.
The Minister for Community Safety (Fergus Ewing)
I am happy to take up that kind invitation, convener. I welcome all members’ contributions to the debate. This is a difficult and sensitive issue, as members...
Robert Brown
I am particularly reassured by the minister’s final comment. We are, perhaps, all left a little bit perplexed about the difference between raising the age of...
The Convener
It is an important issue and it is appropriate that it be debated as thoroughly as possible. The question is, that amendment 379 be agreed to. Are we agreed?...
The Convener
There will be a division.ForBrown, Robert (Glasgow) (LD)AgainstAitken, Bill (Glasgow) (Con)Butler, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (Lab)Constance, Angela (Livingst...
The Convener
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 7, Abstentions 0.Amendment 379 disagreed to.Amendment 126 moved—Bill Aitken.
The Convener
The question is, that amendment 126 be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
The Convener
There will be a division.ForAitken, Bill (Glasgow) (Con)AgainstBrown, Robert (Glasgow) (LD)Butler, Bill (Glasgow Anniesland) (Lab)Constance, Angela (Livingst...
The Convener
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 7, Abstentions 0.Amendment 126 disagreed to.Amendment 127 not moved.
Richard Baker
Given what has been said about the maths, and in light of the reassurances that have been given, I will not move amendment 389.Amendment 389 not moved.Sectio...
The Convener
Amendment 128, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, is grouped with amendment 129.
Fergus Ewing
Many statutes provide that when a body corporate is guilty of an offence, and it is proved that the offence was committed with the consent or connivance of a...
The Convener
As other members have no comments, I will make some of my own. The amendments in this group are predicated on the need to plug a loophole that seems to exist...
The Convener
Amendment 130, in the name of Kenny MacAskill, is grouped with amendment 131.
Fergus Ewing
Amendment 130 is a minor technical amendment, the purpose of which is to change the current reference to “all reasonable hours” in section 40(2)(b) to “a rea...
The Convener
The purpose of amendment 131 was to probe exactly how this was going to pan out at the end of the day. I was seeking to avoid evidence in court being valued ...
Robert Brown
This is a difficult area—there are no two ways about it. One must be cautious about making significant changes in procedures that have applied for a long tim...
James Kelly (Glasgow Rutherglen) (Lab)
I support the amendment in the name of the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and the sentiments that the minister expressed in his contribution. Being required t...
The Convener
Amendment 403, in the name of Margaret Curran, is in a group on its own. I apologise to Margaret for the fact that she came to last week’s meeting but was un...
Margaret Curran (Glasgow Baillieston) (Lab)
It has been most illuminating to be here. I thank the clerks for their assistance in drafting amendment 403. The amendment is simple but significant. It repr...
Robert Brown
Margaret Curran has raised a very interesting issue. The Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 2003, which a previous Government introduced, brought in victim stat...
Angela Constance
I cannot imagine that anybody round the table would be unsympathetic to the need to create more opportunities for victims to be heard at various points in th...
James Kelly
Margaret Curran has lodged an important amendment, which I support.I would like to address a specific issue that is not the same as the one that Margaret Cur...